5.10.100-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

    Linux 5.10.100-rc1

Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi

Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                      | 4 ++--
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c      | 2 ++
 crypto/algapi.c               | 1 +
 crypto/api.c                  | 1 -
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.

It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

@@ -708,12 +708,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(host->dma_chan_rx))
 		dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx);
 	mmc_remove_host(mmc);
-	mmc_free_host(mmc);
 
 	writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
 	writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
 	writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
 	       host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+	mmc_free_host(mmc);
 
 	return 0;
 }

From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>

commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.

Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected.
For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation, which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.

---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

@@ -4654,6 +4654,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block))
 		return -E2BIG;
+	if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	switch (mop->op) {
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:

From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.

The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded. This also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.

---
 crypto/algapi.c |    1 +
 crypto/api.c    |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

@@ -1295,3 +1295,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API");
+MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");

@@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");

Hi!

CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Best regards,
Pavel

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:

    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    75 tests:	75 pass, 0 fail

Linux version: 5.10.100-rc1-gf1b074cc52b4
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,

                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Jon

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.100-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252
* git describe: v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 76874, pass: 66765, fail: 223, skip: 9288, xfail: 598

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Hi Greg,

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738

--
Regards
Sudip

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Florian

Build results:

	total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Guenter

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.100-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.100-rc1
Commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9013
passed: 9013
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9013
passed: 9013
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Compiled and booted 5.10.100-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.

Thanks,
Slade