linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerHi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got conflicts in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
between commits:
b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h") 29b9702ffe70d ("drm/i915/ttm: Return some errors instead of trying memcpy move") 9a8e720fd0641 ("drm/i915: split out gem/i915_gem_domain.h from i915_drv.h") b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h")
from the drm-intel tree and commits:
3526b607b0239 ("drm/i915/ttm: Return some errors instead of trying memcpy move") a413c99fc1e49 ("drm/i915: add gtt misalignment test")
b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h")
from the drm-intel-gt tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +0 -0
@@@ -1089,10 -1284,10 +1087,12 @@@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_pr IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10)#define IS_DG2_G11 (dev_priv) \ IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11) +#define IS_DG2_G12 (dev_priv) \ + IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)#define IS_ADLS_RPLS (dev_priv) \ IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL_S) +#define IS_ADLP_N(dev_priv) \ + IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_P, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_N)#define IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV (dev_priv) (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && \ (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)#define IS_BDW_ULT (dev_priv) \
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +0 -0
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c +0 -0
@@@ -26,7 -26,7 +26,8 @@@#include <linux/prime_numbers.h> #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h" +#include "gem/i915_gem_internal.h" +#include "gem/i915_gem_region.h" #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h" #include "gt/intel_context.h" #include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h +4 -1
@@ -12,13 +12,16 @@ struct drm_mm_node;struct i915_address_space ;int __must_check i915_gem_evict_something (struct i915_address_space *vm, +struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,u64 min_size,u64 alignment,unsigned long color,u64 start,u64 end,unsigned flags);int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node (struct i915_address_space *vm, +struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,struct drm_mm_node *node,unsigned int flags); -int i915_gem_evict_vm (struct i915_address_space *vm); +int i915_gem_evict_vm (struct i915_address_space *vm, +struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww);#endif /* __I915_GEM_EVICT_H__ */
Patchwork
CI[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree (rev3)
== Series Details ==
== Series Details ==
Series: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99294/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Applying: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
No changes -- Patch already applied.