net: Fix IP_UNICAST_IF option behavior for connected sockets
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 net: Fix IP_UNICAST_IF option behavior for connected sockets
The IP_UNICAST_IF socket option is used to set the outgoing interface for outbound packets.
The IP_UNICAST_IF socket option was added as it was needed by the Wine project, since no other existing option (SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option, IP_PKTINFO socket option or the bind function) provided the needed characteristics needed by the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option. [1] The IP_UNICAST_IF socket option works well for unconnected sockets, that is, the interface specified by the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option is taken into consideration in the route lookup process when a packet is being sent.
However, for connected sockets, the outbound interface is chosen when connecting the socket, and in the route lookup process which is done when a packet is being sent, the interface specified by the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option is being ignored.
This inconsistent behavior was reported and discussed in an issue opened on systemd's GitHub project [2]. Also, a bug report was submitted in the kernel's bugzilla [3].
To understand the problem in more detail, we can look at what happens for UDP packets over IPv4 (The same analysis was done separately in the referenced systemd issue).
When a UDP packet is sent the udp_sendmsg function gets called and the following happens:
1. The oif member of the struct ipcm_cookie ipc (which stores the output interface of the packet) is initialized by the ipcm_init_sk function to inet->sk.sk_bound_dev_if (the device set by the SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option).
2. If the IP_PKTINFO socket option was set, the oif member gets overridden by the call to the ip_cmsg_send function.
3. If no output interface was selected yet, the interface specified by the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option is used.
4. If the socket is connected and no destination address is specified in the send function, the struct ipcm_cookie ipc is not taken into consideration and the cached route, that was calculated in the connect function is being used.
Thus, for a connected socket, the IP_UNICAST_IF sockopt isn't taken into consideration.
This patch corrects the behavior of the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option for connect()ed sockets by taking into consideration the IP_UNICAST_IF sockopt when connecting the socket.
In order to avoid reconnecting the socket, this option is still ignored when applied on an already connected socket until connect() is called again by the user.
Change the __ip4_datagram_connect function, which is called during socket connection, to take into consideration the interface set by the IP_UNICAST_IF socket option, in a similar way to what is done in the udp_sendmsg function.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1328685717.4736.4.camel@edumazet-laptop/T/
[2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11935#issuecomment-618691018
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210255
--- net/ipv4/datagram.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
net/ipv4/datagram.c +2 -0
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ int __ip4_datagram_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len oif = inet->mc_index;if (!saddr) saddr = inet->mc_addr; + }else if (!oif) { + oif = inet->uc_index; } fl4 = &inet->cork.fl.u.ip4; rt = ip_route_connect(fl4, usin->sin_addr.s_addr, saddr,
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
Paolo Abeni
maintainerQuoted 41 lines · Richard Gobert
The
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used to set the outgoing interface for outbound packets.
TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option was added as it was needed by the Wine project, since no other existing option (SO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option,IP_PKTINFOsocket option or the bind function) provided the needed characteristics needed by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option. [1] TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option works well for unconnected sockets, that is, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is taken into consideration in the route lookup process when a packet is being sent.
However, for connected sockets, the outbound interface is chosen when connecting the socket, and in the route lookup process which is done when a packet is being sent, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is being ignored.This inconsistent behavior was reported and discussed in an issue opened on systemd's GitHub project [2]. Also, a bug report was submitted in the kernel's bugzilla [3].
To understand the problem in more detail, we can look at what happens for UDP packets over IPv4 (The same analysis was done separately in the referenced systemd issue).
When a UDP packet is sent theudp_sendmsgfunction gets called and the following happens:1. The oif member of the struct
ipcm_cookieipc (which stores the output interface of the packet) is initialized by theipcm_init_skfunction toinet->sk.sk_bound_dev_if(the device set by theSO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option).2. If the
IP_PKTINFOsocket option was set, the oif member gets overridden by the call to theip_cmsg_sendfunction.3. If no output interface was selected yet, the interface specified by the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used.4. If the socket is connected and no destination address is specified in the send function, the struct
ipcm_cookieipc is not taken into consideration and the cached route, that was calculated in the connect function is being used.
Quoted 6 lines
Thus, for a connected socket, the
IP_UNICAST_IFsockopt isn't taken into consideration.This patch corrects the behavior of the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option for connect()ed sockets by taking into consideration theIP_UNICAST_IFsockopt when connecting the socket.
This also changes a long-established behavior for such socket option. It can break existing application assuming connect() is not affected by IP_UNICAST_IF. I'm unsure we can accept it.
Cheers,
Paolo
Quoted 3 lines · Paolo Abeni
This also changes a long-established behavior for such socket option. It can break existing application assuming
connect()is not affected byIP_UNICAST_IF. I'm unsure we can accept it.
The IP_UNICAST_IF option was initially introduced for better compatibility with the matching Windows socket-option. Its goal was better support for wine applications.
This patch improves the compatibility even further since Windows behaves this way for connect()ed sockets.
Also, I have not been able to find any examples of Linux applications that use IP_UNICAST_IF with connect(). It would be quite confusing to use this sockopt and expect that it would not affect your socket. I think that unless someone finds an example of such a use case, then it is better to accept this patch to improve compatibility for applications that run with wine.
What are your thoughts on this?
Regards,
Richard
Quoted 11 lines · Richard Gobert
Quoted 3 lines · Paolo Abeni
This also changes a long-established behavior for such socket option. It can break existing application assuming
connect()is not affected byIP_UNICAST_IF. I'm unsure we can accept it.The
IP_UNICAST_IFoption was initially introduced for better compatibility with the matching Windows socket-option. Its goal was better support for wine applications.
This patch improves the compatibility even further since Windows behaves this way for connect()ed sockets.
Quoted 9 lines
Also, I have not been able to find any examples of Linux applications that use
IP_UNICAST_IFwithconnect(). It would be quite confusing to use this sockopt and expect that it would not affect your socket. I think that unless someone finds an example of such a use case, then it is better to accept this patch to improve compatibility for applications that run with wine.What are your thoughts on this?
I can't imagine how a 'connected' socket would propelry work if connect path does not consider oif and then per message does. i.e, i think the patch has some risk but is the right thing to do.
Quoted 57 lines · Richard Gobert
The
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used to set the outgoing interface for outbound packets.
TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option was added as it was needed by the Wine project, since no other existing option (SO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option,IP_PKTINFOsocket option or the bind function) provided the needed characteristics needed by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option. [1] TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option works well for unconnected sockets, that is, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is taken into consideration in the route lookup process when a packet is being sent.
However, for connected sockets, the outbound interface is chosen when connecting the socket, and in the route lookup process which is done when a packet is being sent, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is being ignored.This inconsistent behavior was reported and discussed in an issue opened on systemd's GitHub project [2]. Also, a bug report was submitted in the kernel's bugzilla [3].
To understand the problem in more detail, we can look at what happens for UDP packets over IPv4 (The same analysis was done separately in the referenced systemd issue).
When a UDP packet is sent theudp_sendmsgfunction gets called and the following happens:1. The oif member of the struct
ipcm_cookieipc (which stores the output interface of the packet) is initialized by theipcm_init_skfunction toinet->sk.sk_bound_dev_if(the device set by theSO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option).2. If the
IP_PKTINFOsocket option was set, the oif member gets overridden by the call to theip_cmsg_sendfunction.3. If no output interface was selected yet, the interface specified by the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used.4. If the socket is connected and no destination address is specified in the send function, the struct
ipcm_cookieipc is not taken into consideration and the cached route, that was calculated in the connect function is being used.Thus, for a connected socket, the
IP_UNICAST_IFsockopt isn't taken into consideration.This patch corrects the behavior of the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option for connect()ed sockets by taking into consideration theIP_UNICAST_IFsockopt when connecting the socket.In order to avoid reconnecting the socket, this option is still ignored when applied on an already connected socket until
connect()is called again by the user.Change the
__ip4_datagram_connectfunction, which is called during socket connection, to take into consideration the interface set by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option, in a similar way to what is done in theudp_sendmsgfunction.
Quoted 9 lines
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1328685717.4736.4.camel@edumazet-laptop/T/
[2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11935#issuecomment-618691018
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210255Signed-off-by Richard Gobert <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/datagram.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
if the maintainers decide to pick it up.
Paolo Abeni
maintainerQuoted 68 lines · David Ahern
Quoted 57 lines · Richard Gobert
The
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used to set the outgoing interface for outbound packets.
TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option was added as it was needed by the Wine project, since no other existing option (SO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option,IP_PKTINFOsocket option or the bind function) provided the needed characteristics needed by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option. [1] TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option works well for unconnected sockets, that is, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is taken into consideration in the route lookup process when a packet is being sent.
However, for connected sockets, the outbound interface is chosen when connecting the socket, and in the route lookup process which is done when a packet is being sent, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is being ignored.This inconsistent behavior was reported and discussed in an issue opened on systemd's GitHub project [2]. Also, a bug report was submitted in the kernel's bugzilla [3].
To understand the problem in more detail, we can look at what happens for UDP packets over IPv4 (The same analysis was done separately in the referenced systemd issue).
When a UDP packet is sent theudp_sendmsgfunction gets called and the following happens:1. The oif member of the struct
ipcm_cookieipc (which stores the output interface of the packet) is initialized by theipcm_init_skfunction toinet->sk.sk_bound_dev_if(the device set by theSO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option).2. If the
IP_PKTINFOsocket option was set, the oif member gets overridden by the call to theip_cmsg_sendfunction.3. If no output interface was selected yet, the interface specified by the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used.4. If the socket is connected and no destination address is specified in the send function, the struct
ipcm_cookieipc is not taken into consideration and the cached route, that was calculated in the connect function is being used.Thus, for a connected socket, the
IP_UNICAST_IFsockopt isn't taken into consideration.This patch corrects the behavior of the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option for connect()ed sockets by taking into consideration theIP_UNICAST_IFsockopt when connecting the socket.In order to avoid reconnecting the socket, this option is still ignored when applied on an already connected socket until
connect()is called again by the user.Change the
__ip4_datagram_connectfunction, which is called during socket connection, to take into consideration the interface set by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option, in a similar way to what is done in theudp_sendmsgfunction.Quoted 9 lines
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1328685717.4736.4.camel@edumazet-laptop/T/
[2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11935#issuecomment-618691018
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210255Signed-off-by Richard Gobert <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/datagram.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 3 lines
Reviewed-by David Ahern <[email protected]>if the maintainers decide to pick it up.
I think your reasoning is correct, and I'm now ok with the patch. Jakub noted it does not apply cleanly, so a repost will be needed. Additionally it would be great to include some self-tests.
It looks like the feature (even the original one, I mean) is IPv4 specific, don't you need an IPv6 counter-part?
Thanks!
Paolo
Quoted 69 lines · Paolo Abeni
Quoted 68 lines · David Ahern
Quoted 66 lines · Richard Gobert
The
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used to set the outgoing interface for outbound packets.
TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option was added as it was needed by the Wine project, since no other existing option (SO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option,IP_PKTINFOsocket option or the bind function) provided the needed characteristics needed by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option. [1] TheIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option works well for unconnected sockets, that is, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is taken into consideration in the route lookup process when a packet is being sent.
However, for connected sockets, the outbound interface is chosen when connecting the socket, and in the route lookup process which is done when a packet is being sent, the interface specified by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is being ignored.This inconsistent behavior was reported and discussed in an issue opened on systemd's GitHub project [2]. Also, a bug report was submitted in the kernel's bugzilla [3].
To understand the problem in more detail, we can look at what happens for UDP packets over IPv4 (The same analysis was done separately in the referenced systemd issue).
When a UDP packet is sent theudp_sendmsgfunction gets called and the following happens:1. The oif member of the struct
ipcm_cookieipc (which stores the output interface of the packet) is initialized by theipcm_init_skfunction toinet->sk.sk_bound_dev_if(the device set by theSO_BINDTODEVICEsocket option).2. If the
IP_PKTINFOsocket option was set, the oif member gets overridden by the call to theip_cmsg_sendfunction.3. If no output interface was selected yet, the interface specified by the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option is used.4. If the socket is connected and no destination address is specified in the send function, the struct
ipcm_cookieipc is not taken into consideration and the cached route, that was calculated in the connect function is being used.Thus, for a connected socket, the
IP_UNICAST_IFsockopt isn't taken into consideration.This patch corrects the behavior of the
IP_UNICAST_IFsocket option for connect()ed sockets by taking into consideration theIP_UNICAST_IFsockopt when connecting the socket.In order to avoid reconnecting the socket, this option is still ignored when applied on an already connected socket until
connect()is called again by the user.Change the
__ip4_datagram_connectfunction, which is called during socket connection, to take into consideration the interface set by theIP_UNICAST_IFsocket option, in a similar way to what is done in theudp_sendmsgfunction.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1328685717.4736.4.camel@edumazet-laptop/T/
[2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11935#issuecomment-618691018
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210255Signed-off-by Richard Gobert <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/datagram.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Reviewed-by David Ahern <[email protected]>if the maintainers decide to pick it up.
I think your reasoning is correct, and I'm now ok with the patch. Jakub noted it does not apply cleanly, so a repost will be needed. Additionally it would be great to include some self-tests.
Agreed. nettest.c has '-S' option that sets IP_UNICAST_IF after the socket() call and before connect() so it is already doing what is wanted by this patch. Just need positive and negative test cases added to tools/testing/selftests/net.
Quoted 8 lines
It looks like the feature (even the original one, I mean) is IPv4 specific, don't you need an IPv6 counter-part?
Thanks!
Paolo
Quoted 3 lines · Paolo Abeni
I think your reasoning is correct, and I'm now ok with the patch. Jakub noted it does not apply cleanly, so a repost will be needed. Additionally it would be great to include some self-tests.
Will include self-tests and submit V2.
The patch applies cleanly in my local setup. Do you have an idea as to why this might happen? I missed the email where Jakub mentioned this.
Thanks,
Richard
Jakub Kicinski
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:45:11 +0200 Richard Gobert wrote:
Quoted 3 lines · Paolo Abeni
I think your reasoning is correct, and I'm now ok with the patch. Jakub noted it does not apply cleanly, so a repost will be needed. Additionally it would be great to include some self-tests.
Will include self-tests and submit V2.
The patch applies cleanly in my local setup. Do you have an idea as to why this might happen? I missed the email where Jakub mentioned this.
Jakub noted it in a private conversation with Paolo :)
If it does indeed apply cleanly to net-next [1] please repost with the tree name explicitly stated in the subject line, ie. [PATCH net-next] to make sure our bots don't make any mistakes in tree selection for testing.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/