Skip to contentSkip to conversation

lib-test_vmalloc-switch-to-prandom_u32.patch removed from -mm tree

merged mm-stable Andrew Morton 1 participant 1 message Jul 4, 2022

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andrew Morton

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The quilt patch titled
Subject: lib/test_vmalloc: switch to prandom_u32()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-test_vmalloc-switch-to-prandom_u32.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <[email protected]>
Subject: lib/test_vmalloc: switch to prandom_u32()
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:34:49 +0200

A get_random_bytes() function can cause a high contention if it is called across CPUs simultaneously. Because it shares one lock per all CPUs:

<snip>

   class name     con-bounces  contentions   waittime-min   waittime-max waittime-total   waittime-avg    acq-bounces   acquisitions   holdtime-min   holdtime-max holdtime-total   holdtime-avg
   &crng->lock:   663145       665886        0.05           8.85         261966.66        0.39            7188152       13731279       0.04           11.89        2181582.30       0.16
   -----------
   &crng->lock    307835       [<00000000acba59cd>] _extract_crng+0x48/0x90
   &crng->lock    358051       [<00000000f0075abc>] _crng_backtrack_protect+0x32/0x90
   -----------
   &crng->lock    234241       [<00000000f0075abc>] _crng_backtrack_protect+0x32/0x90
   &crng->lock    431645       [<00000000acba59cd>] _extract_crng+0x48/0x90

<snip>

Switch from the get_random_bytes() to prandom_u32() that does not have any internal contention when a random value is needed for the tests.

The reason is to minimize CPU cycles introduced by the test-suite itself from the vmalloc performance metrics.

---

 lib/test_vmalloc.c |   15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
lib/test_vmalloc.c renamed from lib/test_vmalloc.c~lib-test_vmalloc-switch-to-prandom_u32 +8 -7
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ test_report_one_done(void)
 
 static int random_size_align_alloc_test(void)
 {
-	unsigned long size, align, rnd;
+	unsigned long size, align;
+	unsigned int rnd;
 	void *ptr;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < test_loop_count; i++) {
-		get_random_bytes(&rnd, sizeof(rnd));
+		rnd = prandom_u32();
 
 		/*
 		 * Maximum 1024 pages, if PAGE_SIZE is 4096.
@@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ static int random_size_alloc_test(void)
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < test_loop_count; i++) {
-		get_random_bytes(&n, sizeof(i));
+		n = prandom_u32();
 		n = (n % 100) + 1;
 
 		p = vmalloc(n * PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -294,14 +295,14 @@ pcpu_alloc_test(void)
 	for (i = 0; i < 35000; i++) {
 		unsigned int r;
 
-		get_random_bytes(&r, sizeof(i));
+		r = prandom_u32();
 		size = (r % (PAGE_SIZE / 4)) + 1;
 
 		/*
 		 * Maximum PAGE_SIZE
 		 */
-		get_random_bytes(&r, sizeof(i));
-		align = 1 << ((i % 11) + 1);
+		r = prandom_u32();
+		align = 1 << ((r % 11) + 1);
 
 		pcpu[i] = __alloc_percpu(size, align);
 		if (!pcpu[i])
@@ -396,7 +397,7 @@ static void shuffle_array(int *arr, int
 	int i, j;
 
 	for (i = n - 1; i > 0; i--)  {
-		get_random_bytes(&rnd, sizeof(rnd));
+		rnd = prandom_u32();
 
 		/* Cut the range. */
 		j = rnd % i;

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are