dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: Remove restrictions for regulator-name

From: Frieder Schrempf <[email protected]>

The device bindings shouldn't put any constraints on the regulator-name property specified in the generic bindings. This allows using arbitrary and descriptive names for the regulators.

---
 .../bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml     | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

index b539781e39aa..835b53302db8 100644
@@ -47,12 +47,6 @@ properties:
         description:
           Properties for single LDO regulator.
 
-        properties:
-          regulator-name:
-            pattern: "^LDO[1-5]$"
-            description:
-              should be "LDO1", ..., "LDO5"
-
         unevaluatedProperties: false
 
       "^BUCK[1-6]$":

@@ -62,11 +56,6 @@ properties:
           Properties for single BUCK regulator.
 
         properties:
-          regulator-name:
-            pattern: "^BUCK[1-6]$"
-            description:
-              should be "BUCK1", ..., "BUCK6"
-
           nxp,dvs-run-voltage:
             $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
             minimum: 600000

2.37.1

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: Remove restrictions for regulator-name

      commit: b0de7fa706506bf0591037908376351beda8c5d6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark