Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm-gup-fix-foll_force-cow-security-issue-and-remove-foll_cow.patch removed from -mm tree

merged mm-hotfixes-stable Andrew Morton 1 participant 1 message Aug 17, 2022 Stable branch

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andrew Morton

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-gup-fix-foll_force-cow-security-issue-and-remove-foll_cow.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Subject: mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:56:40 +0200

Ever since the Dirty COW (CVE-2016-5195) security issue happened, we know that FOLL_FORCE can be possibly dangerous, especially if there are races that can be exploited by user space.

Right now, it would be sufficient to have some code that sets a PTE of a R/O-mapped shared page dirty, in order for it to erroneously become writable by FOLL_FORCE. The implications of setting a write-protected PTE dirty might not be immediately obvious to everyone.

And in fact ever since commit 9ae0f87d009c ("mm/shmem: unconditionally set pte dirty in mfill_atomic_install_pte"), we can use UFFDIO_CONTINUE to map a shmem page R/O while marking the pte dirty. This can be used by unprivileged user space to modify tmpfs/shmem file content even if the user does not have write permissions to the file, and to bypass memfd write sealing -- Dirty COW restricted to tmpfs/shmem (CVE-2022-2590).

To fix such security issues for good, the insight is that we really only need that fancy retry logic (FOLL_COW) for COW mappings that are not writable (!VM_WRITE). And in a COW mapping, we really only broke COW if we have an exclusive anonymous page mapped. If we have something else mapped, or the mapped anonymous page might be shared (!PageAnonExclusive), we have to trigger a write fault to break COW. If we don't find an exclusive anonymous page when we retry, we have to trigger COW breaking once again because something intervened.

Let's move away from this mandatory-retry + dirty handling and rely on our PageAnonExclusive() flag for making a similar decision, to use the same COW logic as in other kernel parts here as well. In case we stumble over a PTE in a COW mapping that does not map an exclusive anonymous page, COW was not properly broken and we have to trigger a fake write-fault to break COW.

Just like we do in can_change_pte_writable() added via commit 64fe24a3e05e ("mm/mprotect: try avoiding write faults for exclusive anonymous pages when changing protection") and commit 76aefad628aa ("mm/mprotect: fix soft-dirty check in can_change_pte_writable()"), take care of softdirty and uffd-wp manually.

For example, a write() via /proc/self/mem to a uffd-wp-protected range has to fail instead of silently granting write access and bypassing the userspace fault handler. Note that FOLL_FORCE is not only used for debug access, but also triggered by applications without debug intentions, for example, when pinning pages via RDMA.

This fixes CVE-2022-2590. Note that only x86_64 and aarch64 are affected, because only those support CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR.

Fortunately, FOLL_COW is no longer required to handle FOLL_FORCE. So let's just get rid of it.

Thanks to Nadav Amit for pointing out that the pte_dirty() check in FOLL_FORCE code is problematic and might be exploitable.

Note 1: We don't check for the PTE being dirty because it doesn't matter
for making a "was COWed" decision anymore, and whoever modifies the page has to set the page dirty either way.

Note 2: Kernels before extended uffd-wp support and before
PageAnonExclusive (< 5.19) can simply revert the problematic commit instead and be safe regarding UFFDIO_CONTINUE. A backport to v5.19 requires minor adjustments due to lack of vma_soft_dirty_enabled().

Fixes 9ae0f87d009c ("mm/shmem: unconditionally set pte dirty in mfill_atomic_install_pte")
Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc Axel Rasmussen <[email protected]>
Cc Nadav Amit <[email protected]>
Cc Peter Xu <[email protected]>
Cc Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Cc Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Cc David Laight <[email protected]>
Cc <[email protected]> [5.16]

---

 include/linux/mm.h |    1 
 mm/gup.c           |   68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 mm/huge_memory.c   |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
include/linux/mm.h renamed from include/linux/mm.h~mm-gup-fix-foll_force-cow-security-issue-and-remove-foll_cow +0 -1
@@ -2884,7 +2884,6 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
 #define FOLL_MIGRATION	0x400	/* wait for page to replace migration entry */
 #define FOLL_TRIED	0x800	/* a retry, previous pass started an IO */
 #define FOLL_REMOTE	0x2000	/* we are working on non-current tsk/mm */
-#define FOLL_COW	0x4000	/* internal GUP flag */
 #define FOLL_ANON	0x8000	/* don't do file mappings */
 #define FOLL_LONGTERM	0x10000	/* mapping lifetime is indefinite: see below */
 #define FOLL_SPLIT_PMD	0x20000	/* split huge pmd before returning */
mm/gup.c renamed from mm/gup.c~mm-gup-fix-foll_force-cow-security-issue-and-remove-foll_cow +46 -22

89 lines not on this page · raw message

mm/huge_memory.c renamed from mm/huge_memory.c~mm-gup-fix-foll_force-cow-security-issue-and-remove-foll_cow +43 -21

98 lines not on this page · raw message

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are