Skip to contentSkip to conversation

linux-next: manual merge of the soundwire tree with Linus' tree

DISCUSSION Stephen Rothwell 2 participants 2 messages Sep 21, 2022 Linux-next tree

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the soundwire tree got a conflict in:

drivers/soundwire/qcom.c

between commit:

4ef3f2aff126 ("soundwire: qcom: fix device status array range")

from Linus' tree and commits:

8039b6f3e5c7 ("soundwire: qcom: update status from device id 1") ed8d07acec73 ("soundwire: qcom: do not send status of device 0 during alert")

from the soundwire tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Signature · 2 lines
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Stephen Rothwell

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the soundwire tree got a conflict in:

drivers/soundwire/qcom.c

between commit:

4ef3f2aff126 ("soundwire: qcom: fix device status array range")

Quoted 8 lines

from Linus' tree and commits:

8039b6f3e5c7 ("soundwire: qcom: update status from device id 1") ed8d07acec73 ("soundwire: qcom: do not send status of device 0 during alert")

from the soundwire tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks Stephen,

That seems to be the correct resolution, I will merge fixes to bring this in.

Quoted 9 lines

This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Signature · 2 lines
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Signature · 1 line
~Vinod