pinctrl: at91: Cleanups
v2 cover pinctrl: at91: Cleanups
The kasprintf() patch makes me look into the driver code and besides missed fix, there is a room to improve. Hence this series.
Compile tested only.
Changes in v2:
- fixed compilation errors (LKP)
Andy Shevchenko (5):
pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks (part 2)
pinctrl: at91: Don't mix non-devm calls with devm ones
pinctrl: at91: Use of_device_get_match_data()
pinctrl: at91: Use dev_err_probe() instead of custom messaging
pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 164 ++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
PATCH v2 1/5 pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks (part 2)
Use devm_kasprintf() instead of kasprintf() to avoid any potential leaks. At the moment drivers have no remove functionality hence there is no need for fixes tag.
While at it, switch to use devm_kasprintf_strarray().
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +17 -6
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@#include <linux/pm.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h> /* Since we request GPIOs from ourself */ #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
@@ -1371,6 +1372,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,static int at91_pinctrl_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;struct at91_pinctrl *info;struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;int ret, i, j, k;
@@ -1394,9 +1396,19 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return -ENOMEM ;for (i =0 , k =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++) { +char **names; + + names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ); +if (!names) +return -ENOMEM ; +for (j =0 ; j <MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ; j++, k++) { +char *name = names[j]; + +strreplace (name,'-' , i +'A' ); + pdesc->number = k; - pdesc->name =kasprintf (GFP_KERNEL ,"pio%c%d" , i +'A' , j); + pdesc->name = name; pdesc++; } }
@@ -1797,7 +1809,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] = {static int at91_gpio_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; +struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip =NULL ;struct gpio_chip *chip;struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
@@ -1866,16 +1879,14 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) chip->ngpio = ngpio; } - names =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, chip->ngpio,sizeof (char *), -GFP_KERNEL ); - + names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio);if (!names) { ret = -ENOMEM ; goto clk_enable_err; }for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++) - names[i] =devm_kasprintf (&pdev->dev,GFP_KERNEL ,"pio%c%d" , alias_idx +'A' , i); +strreplace (names[i],'-' , alias_idx +'A' ); chip->names = (const char *const *)names;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks (part 2)
Quoted 9 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Use
devm_kasprintf()instead ofkasprintf()to avoid any potential leaks. At the moment drivers have no remove functionality hence there is no need for fixes tag.While at it, switch to use
devm_kasprintf_strarray().Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 75 lines
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +17
-7@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@#include <linux/pm.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h> /* Since we request GPIOs from ourself */ #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> @@ -1371,6 +1372,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,static int at91_pinctrl_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;struct at91_pinctrl *info;struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;int ret, i, j, k;@@ -1394,9 +1396,19 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return -ENOMEM ;for (i =0 , k =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++) { +char **names; + + names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ); +if (!names) +return -ENOMEM ; +for (j =0 ; j <MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ; j++, k++) { +char *name = names[j]; + +strreplace (name,'-' , i +'A' ); + pdesc->number = k; - pdesc->name =kasprintf (GFP_KERNEL ,"pio%c%d" , i +'A' , j); + pdesc->name = name; pdesc++; } }@@ -1797,7 +1809,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] = {static int at91_gpio_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; +struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip =NULL ;struct gpio_chip *chip;struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;@@ -1866,16 +1879,14 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) chip->ngpio = ngpio; } - names =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, chip->ngpio,sizeof (char *), -GFP_KERNEL ); - + names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio);if (!names) { ret = -ENOMEM ; goto clk_enable_err; }for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++) - names[i] =devm_kasprintf (&pdev->dev,GFP_KERNEL ,"pio%c%d" , alias_idx +'A' , i); +strreplace (names[i],'-' , alias_idx +'A' ); chip->names = (const char *const *)names; --
Quoted 2 lines
2.39.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v2 2/5 pinctrl: at91: Don't mix non-devm calls with devm ones
In reply to Andy ShevchenkoReplace devm_clk_get() by devm_clk_get_enabled() and drop unneeded code pieces. This will make sure we keep the ordering of the resource allocation correct.
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +2 -10
@@ -1849,19 +1849,13 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; - at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get (&pdev->dev,NULL ); + at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL );if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock); goto err; } - ret =clk_prepare_enable (at91_chip->clock); -if (ret) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to prepare and enable clock, ignoring.\n" ); - goto clk_enable_err; - } - at91_chip->chip = at91_gpio_template; at91_chip->id = alias_idx;
@@ -1882,7 +1876,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio);if (!names) { ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto clk_enable_err; + goto err; }for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++)
@@ -1915,8 +1909,6 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return 0 ; gpiochip_add_err: -clk_enable_err: -clk_disable_unprepare (at91_chip->clock); err:dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Failure %i for GPIO %i\n" , ret, alias_idx);
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: at91: Don't mix non-devm calls with devm ones
Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Replace
devm_clk_get()bydevm_clk_get_enabled()and drop unneeded code pieces. This will make sure we keep the ordering of the resource allocation correct.Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 48 lines
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +2
-11@@ -1849,19 +1849,13 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; - at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get (&pdev->dev,NULL ); + at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL );if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock); goto err; } - ret =clk_prepare_enable (at91_chip->clock); -if (ret) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to prepare and enable clock, ignoring.\n" ); - goto clk_enable_err; - } - at91_chip->chip = at91_gpio_template; at91_chip->id = alias_idx;@@ -1882,7 +1876,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio);if (!names) { ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto clk_enable_err; + goto err; }for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++)@@ -1915,8 +1909,6 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return 0 ; gpiochip_add_err: -clk_enable_err: -clk_disable_unprepare (at91_chip->clock); err:dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Failure %i for GPIO %i\n" , ret, alias_idx); --
Quoted 2 lines
2.39.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v2 3/5 pinctrl: at91: Use of_device_get_match_data()
In reply to Andy ShevchenkoUse of_device_get_match_data() to simplify the code.
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +2 -4
@@ -1304,8 +1304,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,return -ENODEV ; info->dev = &pdev->dev; - info->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) -of_match_device (at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data; + info->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev);at91_pinctrl_child_count (info, np);/*
@@ -1844,8 +1843,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err; } - at91_chip->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) -of_match_device (at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data; + at91_chip->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev); at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: at91: Use of_device_get_match_data()
Quoted 5 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Use
of_device_get_match_data()to simplify the code.Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 29 lines
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +2
-5@@ -1304,8 +1304,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,return -ENODEV ; info->dev = &pdev->dev; - info->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) -of_match_device (at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data; + info->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev);at91_pinctrl_child_count (info, np);/* @@ -1844,8 +1843,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err; } - at91_chip->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) -of_match_device (at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data; + at91_chip->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev); at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; --
Quoted 2 lines
2.39.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v2 4/5 pinctrl: at91: Use dev_err_probe() instead of custom messaging
In reply to Andy ShevchenkoThe custom message has no value except printing the error code, the same does dev_err_probe(). Let's use the latter for the sake of unification.
Note that some APIs already have messaging in them and some simply do not require the current noise.
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 64 +++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +21 -43
@@ -1294,10 +1294,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_pinctrl_of_match[] = {static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt (struct platform_device *pdev,struct at91_pinctrl *info) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;int ret =0 ;int i, j, ngpio_chips_enabled =0 ;uint32_t *tmp; -struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; +struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;struct device_node *child;if (!np)
@@ -1360,9 +1361,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,continue ; ret =at91_pinctrl_parse_functions (child, info, i++);if (ret) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to parse function\n" );of_node_put (child); -return ret; +return dev_err_probe (dev, ret,"failed to parse function\n" ); } }
@@ -1415,11 +1415,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)platform_set_drvdata (pdev, info); info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (&pdev->dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, info); - -if (IS_ERR (info->pctl)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" ); -return PTR_ERR (info->pctl); - } +if (IS_ERR (info->pctl)) +return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (info->pctl),"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );/* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */ for (i =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++)
@@ -1820,39 +1817,28 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)char **names;BUG_ON (alias_idx >=ARRAY_SIZE (gpio_chips)); -if (gpio_chips[alias_idx]) { - ret = -EBUSY ; - goto err; - } +if (gpio_chips[alias_idx]) +return dev_err_probe (dev, -EBUSY ,"%d slot is occupied.\n" , alias_idx); irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <0 ) { - ret = irq; - goto err; - } +if (irq <0 ) +return irq; at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!at91_chip) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto err; - } +if (!at91_chip) +return -ENOMEM ; at91_chip->regbase =devm_platform_ioremap_resource (pdev,0 ); -if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->regbase)) { - ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->regbase); - goto err; - } +if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->regbase)) +return PTR_ERR (at91_chip->regbase); at91_chip->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev); at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL ); -if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); - ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock); - goto err; - } +if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) +return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock),"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); at91_chip->chip = at91_gpio_template; at91_chip->id = alias_idx;
@@ -1865,17 +1851,15 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (!of_property_read_u32 (np,"#gpio-lines" , &ngpio)) {if (ngpio >=MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ) -pr_err ("at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n" , - alias_idx,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ); +dev_err (dev,"at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n" , + alias_idx,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK );else chip->ngpio = ngpio; } names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio); -if (!names) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto err; - } +if (!names) +return -ENOMEM ;for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++)strreplace (names[i],'-' , alias_idx +'A' );
@@ -1892,11 +1876,11 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret =at91_gpio_of_irq_setup (pdev, at91_chip);if (ret) - goto gpiochip_add_err; +return ret; ret =gpiochip_add_data (chip, at91_chip);if (ret) - goto gpiochip_add_err; +return ret; gpio_chips[alias_idx] = at91_chip;platform_set_drvdata (pdev, at91_chip);
@@ -1905,12 +1889,6 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)dev_info (&pdev->dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase);return 0 ; - -gpiochip_add_err: -err: -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Failure %i for GPIO %i\n" , ret, alias_idx); - -return ret; }static const struct dev_pm_ops at91_gpio_pm_ops = {
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] pinctrl: at91: Use dev_err_probe() instead of custom messaging
Quoted 10 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
The custom message has no value except printing the error code, the same does
dev_err_probe(). Let's use the latter for the sake of unification.Note that some APIs already have messaging in them and some simply do not require the current noise.
Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 148 lines
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 64 +++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +21
-44@@ -1294,10 +1294,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_pinctrl_of_match[] = {static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt (struct platform_device *pdev,struct at91_pinctrl *info) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;int ret =0 ;int i, j, ngpio_chips_enabled =0 ;uint32_t *tmp; -struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; +struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;struct device_node *child;if (!np)@@ -1360,9 +1361,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,continue ; ret =at91_pinctrl_parse_functions (child, info, i++);if (ret) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to parse function\n" );of_node_put (child); -return ret; +return dev_err_probe (dev, ret,"failed to parse function\n" ); } }@@ -1415,11 +1415,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)platform_set_drvdata (pdev, info); info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (&pdev->dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, info); - -if (IS_ERR (info->pctl)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" ); -return PTR_ERR (info->pctl); - } +if (IS_ERR (info->pctl)) +return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (info->pctl),"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );/* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */ for (i =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++)@@ -1820,39 +1817,28 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)char **names;BUG_ON (alias_idx >=ARRAY_SIZE (gpio_chips)); -if (gpio_chips[alias_idx]) { - ret = -EBUSY ; - goto err; - } +if (gpio_chips[alias_idx]) +return dev_err_probe (dev, -EBUSY ,"%d slot is occupied.\n" , alias_idx); irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <0 ) { - ret = irq; - goto err; - } +if (irq <0 ) +return irq; at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!at91_chip) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto err; - } +if (!at91_chip) +return -ENOMEM ; at91_chip->regbase =devm_platform_ioremap_resource (pdev,0 ); -if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->regbase)) { - ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->regbase); - goto err; - } +if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->regbase)) +return PTR_ERR (at91_chip->regbase); at91_chip->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev); at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL ); -if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); - ret =PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock); - goto err; - } +if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock)) +return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock),"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" ); at91_chip->chip = at91_gpio_template; at91_chip->id = alias_idx;@@ -1865,17 +1851,15 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (!of_property_read_u32 (np,"#gpio-lines" , &ngpio)) {if (ngpio >=MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ) -pr_err ("at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n" , - alias_idx,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ); +dev_err (dev,"at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n" , + alias_idx,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ,MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK );else chip->ngpio = ngpio; } names =devm_kasprintf_strarray (dev,"pio" , chip->ngpio); -if (!names) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto err; - } +if (!names) +return -ENOMEM ;for (i =0 ; i < chip->ngpio; i++)strreplace (names[i],'-' , alias_idx +'A' );@@ -1892,11 +1876,11 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret =at91_gpio_of_irq_setup (pdev, at91_chip);if (ret) - goto gpiochip_add_err; +return ret; ret =gpiochip_add_data (chip, at91_chip);if (ret) - goto gpiochip_add_err; +return ret; gpio_chips[alias_idx] = at91_chip;platform_set_drvdata (pdev, at91_chip);@@ -1905,12 +1889,6 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)dev_info (&pdev->dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase);return 0 ; - -gpiochip_add_err: -err: -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Failure %i for GPIO %i\n" , ret, alias_idx); - -return ret; }static const struct dev_pm_ops at91_gpio_pm_ops = { --2.39.1
PATCH v2 5/5 pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
In reply to Andy ShevchenkoWe have a temporary variable to keep pointer to struct device. Utilise it inside the ->probe() implementation.
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 63 +++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +27 -36
@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,if (!np)return -ENODEV ; - info->dev = &pdev->dev; + info->dev = dev; info->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev);at91_pinctrl_child_count (info, np);
@@ -1324,35 +1324,30 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,if (ret)return ret; -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nmux = %d\n" , info->nmux); +dev_dbg (dev,"nmux = %d\n" , info->nmux); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"mux-mask\n" ); +dev_dbg (dev,"mux-mask\n" ); tmp = info->mux_mask;for (i =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++) { -for (j =0 ; j < info->nmux; j++, tmp++) { -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"%d:%d\t0x%x\n" , i, j, tmp[0 ]); - } +for (j =0 ; j < info->nmux; j++, tmp++) +dev_dbg (dev,"%d:%d\t0x%x\n" , i, j, tmp[0 ]); } -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); - info->functions =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - info->nfunctions, -sizeof (struct at91_pmx_func ), -GFP_KERNEL ); +dev_dbg (dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); +dev_dbg (dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); + info->functions =devm_kcalloc (dev, info->nfunctions,sizeof (*info->functions), +GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->functions)return -ENOMEM ; - info->groups =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - info->ngroups, -sizeof (struct at91_pin_group ), -GFP_KERNEL ); + info->groups =devm_kcalloc (dev, info->ngroups,sizeof (*info->groups), +GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->groups)return -ENOMEM ; -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nbanks = %d\n" , gpio_banks); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); +dev_dbg (dev,"nbanks = %d\n" , gpio_banks); +dev_dbg (dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); +dev_dbg (dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); i =0 ;
@@ -1376,7 +1371,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;int ret, i, j, k; - info =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*info),GFP_KERNEL ); + info =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*info),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info)return -ENOMEM ;
@@ -1384,13 +1379,10 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (ret)return ret; - at91_pinctrl_desc.name =dev_name (&pdev->dev); + at91_pinctrl_desc.name =dev_name (dev); at91_pinctrl_desc.npins = gpio_banks *MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ; at91_pinctrl_desc.pins = pdesc = -devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - at91_pinctrl_desc.npins,sizeof (*pdesc), -GFP_KERNEL ); - +devm_kcalloc (dev, at91_pinctrl_desc.npins,sizeof (*pdesc),GFP_KERNEL );if (!at91_pinctrl_desc.pins)return -ENOMEM ;
@@ -1413,8 +1405,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }platform_set_drvdata (pdev, info); - info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (&pdev->dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, - info); + info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, info);if (IS_ERR (info->pctl))return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (info->pctl),"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );
@@ -1423,7 +1414,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (gpio_chips[i])pinctrl_add_gpio_range (info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range); -dev_info (&pdev->dev,"initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n" ); +dev_info (dev,"initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );return 0 ; }
@@ -1714,6 +1705,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup (struct platform_device *pdev,struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_prev =NULL ;struct at91_gpio_chip *prev =NULL ;struct irq_data *d =irq_get_irq_data (at91_gpio->pioc_virq);
@@ -1721,8 +1713,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;int i; - gpio_irqchip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*gpio_irqchip), -GFP_KERNEL ); + gpio_irqchip =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*gpio_irqchip),GFP_KERNEL );if (!gpio_irqchip)return -ENOMEM ;
@@ -1758,7 +1749,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,if (!gpiochip_prev) { girq->parent_handler = gpio_irq_handler; girq->num_parents =1 ; - girq->parents =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev,1 , + girq->parents =devm_kcalloc (dev, girq->num_parents,sizeof (*girq->parents),GFP_KERNEL );if (!girq->parents)
@@ -1824,7 +1815,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (irq <0 )return irq; - at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL ); + at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL );if (!at91_chip)return -ENOMEM ;
@@ -1836,7 +1827,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; - at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL ); + at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (dev,NULL );if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock))return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock),"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" );
@@ -1844,8 +1835,8 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->id = alias_idx; chip = &at91_chip->chip; - chip->label =dev_name (&pdev->dev); - chip->parent = &pdev->dev; + chip->label =dev_name (dev); + chip->parent = dev; chip->owner =THIS_MODULE ; chip->base = alias_idx *MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ;
@@ -1886,7 +1877,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)platform_set_drvdata (pdev, at91_chip); gpio_banks =max (gpio_banks, alias_idx +1 ); -dev_info (&pdev->dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase); +dev_info (dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
We have a temporary variable to keep pointer to struct device. Utilise it inside the ->probe() implementation.
Apart from this the patch also removes some { } and does some alignments. For clarity some of these might go better in a different patch.
Quoted 21 lines
Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 63 +++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +1
-1@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,if (!np)return -ENODEV ; - info->dev = &pdev->dev; + info->dev = dev; info->ops =of_device_get_match_data (dev);at91_pinctrl_child_count (info, np);@@ -1324,35 +1324,30 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,if (ret)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, · line 1332
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +2
-3return ret; -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nmux = %d\n" , info->nmux); +dev_dbg (dev,"nmux = %d\n" , info->nmux); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"mux-mask\n" ); +dev_dbg (dev,"mux-mask\n" ); tmp = info->mux_mask;for (i =0 ; i < gpio_banks; i++) { -for (j =0 ; j < info->nmux; j++, tmp++) {
here
Quoted 149 lines
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c +24
-33-dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"%d:%d\t0x%x\n" , i, j, tmp[0 ]); - } +for (j =0 ; j < info->nmux; j++, tmp++) +dev_dbg (dev,"%d:%d\t0x%x\n" , i, j, tmp[0 ]); } -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); - info->functions =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - info->nfunctions, -sizeof (struct at91_pmx_func ), -GFP_KERNEL ); +dev_dbg (dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); +dev_dbg (dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); + info->functions =devm_kcalloc (dev, info->nfunctions,sizeof (*info->functions), +GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->functions)return -ENOMEM ; - info->groups =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - info->ngroups, -sizeof (struct at91_pin_group ), -GFP_KERNEL ); + info->groups =devm_kcalloc (dev, info->ngroups,sizeof (*info->groups), +GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->groups)return -ENOMEM ; -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nbanks = %d\n" , gpio_banks); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); -dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); +dev_dbg (dev,"nbanks = %d\n" , gpio_banks); +dev_dbg (dev,"nfunctions = %d\n" , info->nfunctions); +dev_dbg (dev,"ngroups = %d\n" , info->ngroups); i =0 ;@@ -1376,7 +1371,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;int ret, i, j, k; - info =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*info),GFP_KERNEL ); + info =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*info),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info)return -ENOMEM ;@@ -1384,13 +1379,10 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (ret)return ret; - at91_pinctrl_desc.name =dev_name (&pdev->dev); + at91_pinctrl_desc.name =dev_name (dev); at91_pinctrl_desc.npins = gpio_banks *MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ; at91_pinctrl_desc.pins = pdesc = -devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev, - at91_pinctrl_desc.npins,sizeof (*pdesc), -GFP_KERNEL ); - +devm_kcalloc (dev, at91_pinctrl_desc.npins,sizeof (*pdesc),GFP_KERNEL );if (!at91_pinctrl_desc.pins)return -ENOMEM ;@@ -1413,8 +1405,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }platform_set_drvdata (pdev, info); - info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (&pdev->dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, - info); + info->pctl =devm_pinctrl_register (dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc, info);if (IS_ERR (info->pctl))return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (info->pctl),"could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );@@ -1423,7 +1414,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (gpio_chips[i])pinctrl_add_gpio_range (info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range); -dev_info (&pdev->dev,"initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n" ); +dev_info (dev,"initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n" );return 0 ; }@@ -1714,6 +1705,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup (struct platform_device *pdev,struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio) { +struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_prev =NULL ;struct at91_gpio_chip *prev =NULL ;struct irq_data *d =irq_get_irq_data (at91_gpio->pioc_virq);@@ -1721,8 +1713,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;int i; - gpio_irqchip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*gpio_irqchip), -GFP_KERNEL ); + gpio_irqchip =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*gpio_irqchip),GFP_KERNEL );if (!gpio_irqchip)return -ENOMEM ;@@ -1758,7 +1749,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,if (!gpiochip_prev) { girq->parent_handler = gpio_irq_handler; girq->num_parents =1 ; - girq->parents =devm_kcalloc (&pdev->dev,1 , + girq->parents =devm_kcalloc (dev, girq->num_parents,sizeof (*girq->parents),GFP_KERNEL );if (!girq->parents)@@ -1824,7 +1815,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (irq <0 )return irq; - at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL ); + at91_chip =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*at91_chip),GFP_KERNEL );if (!at91_chip)return -ENOMEM ;@@ -1836,7 +1827,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq; at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx; - at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (&pdev->dev,NULL ); + at91_chip->clock =devm_clk_get_enabled (dev,NULL );if (IS_ERR (at91_chip->clock))return dev_err_probe (dev,PTR_ERR (at91_chip->clock),"failed to get clock, ignoring.\n" );@@ -1844,8 +1835,8 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_chip->id = alias_idx; chip = &at91_chip->chip; - chip->label =dev_name (&pdev->dev); - chip->parent = &pdev->dev; + chip->label =dev_name (dev); + chip->parent = dev; chip->owner =THIS_MODULE ; chip->base = alias_idx *MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK ;@@ -1886,7 +1877,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)platform_set_drvdata (pdev, at91_chip); gpio_banks =max (gpio_banks, alias_idx +1 ); -dev_info (&pdev->dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase); +dev_info (dev,"at address %p\n" , at91_chip->regbase);return 0 ; } --2.39.1
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
Quoted 8 lines · On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:11:58AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
We have a temporary variable to keep pointer to struct device. Utilise it inside the ->probe() implementation.
Apart from this the patch also removes some { } and does some alignments. For clarity some of these might go better in a different patch.
I was under impression that checkpatch will complain about it, but it appears that it does not. I will issue a new version with this updated.
Thanks for your reviews and testing!
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko