Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: dts: rockchip: add power-domains property to dp node on rk3288

PATCH New Sasha Levin 1 participant 4 messages Feb 15, 2023

Subsystems (6)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Sasha Levin

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/4 ARM: dts: rockchip: add power-domains property to dp node on rk3288

From: Johan Jonker <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 80422339a75088322b4d3884bd12fa0fe5d11050 ]

The clocks in the Rockchip rk3288 DisplayPort node are included in the power-domain@RK3288_PD_VIO logic, but the power-domains property in the dp node is missing, so fix it.

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi +1 -0
index e442bf7427ae1..402b5e0fd616c 100644
@@ -1172,6 +1172,7 @@ edp: dp@ff970000 {
 		clock-names = "dp", "pclk";
 		phys = <&edp_phy>;
 		phy-names = "dp";
+		power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;
 		resets = <&cru SRST_EDP>;
 		reset-names = "dp";
 		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.0
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/4 ACPI: NFIT: fix a potential deadlock during NFIT teardown

From: Vishal Verma <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fb6df4366f86dd252bfa3049edffa52d17e7b895 ]

Lockdep reports that acpi_nfit_shutdown() may deadlock against an opportune acpi_nfit_scrub(). acpi_nfit_scrub () is run from inside a 'work' and therefore has already acquired workqueue-internal locks. It also acquiires acpi_desc->init_mutex. acpi_nfit_shutdown() first acquires init_mutex, and was subsequently attempting to cancel any pending workqueue items. This reversed locking order causes a potential deadlock:

    ======================================================
    WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
    6.2.0-rc3 #116 Tainted: G           O     N
    ------------------------------------------------------
    libndctl/1958 is trying to acquire lock:
    ffff888129b461c0 ((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x43/0x450

    but task is already holding lock:
    ffff888129b460e8 (&acpi_desc->init_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_nfit_shutdown+0x87/0xd0 [nfit]

    which lock already depends on the new lock.

    ...

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
                                  lock((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work));
                                  lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
     lock((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work));

    *** DEADLOCK ***

Since the workqueue manipulation is protected by its own internal locking, the cancellation of pending work doesn't need to be done under acpi_desc->init_mutex. Move cancel_delayed_work_sync() outside the init_mutex to fix the deadlock. Any work that starts after acpi_nfit_shutdown() drops the lock will see ARS_CANCEL, and the cancel_delayed_work_sync() will safely flush it out.

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c +1 -1
index 58a756ca14d85..c2863eec0f241 100644
@@ -3442,8 +3442,8 @@ void acpi_nfit_shutdown(void *data)
 
 	mutex_lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
 	set_bit(ARS_CANCEL, &acpi_desc->scrub_flags);
-	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&acpi_desc->dwork);
 	mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&acpi_desc->dwork);
 
 	/*
 	 * Bounce the nvdimm bus lock to make sure any in-flight
Signature · 1 line
2.39.0
author maintainer
#2 lore raw

PATCH 3/4 btrfs: send: limit number of clones and allocated memory size

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: David Sterba <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 33e17b3f5ab74af12aca58c515bc8424ff69a343 ]

The arg->clone_sources_count is u64 and can trigger a warning when a huge value is passed from user space and a huge array is allocated. Limit the allocated memory to 8MiB (can be increased if needed), which in turn limits the number of clone sources to 8M / sizeof(struct clone_root) = 8M / 40 = 209715. Real world number of clones is from tens to hundreds, so this is future proof.

---
 fs/btrfs/send.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/send.c +3 -3
index 80d248e88761d..1f535cd990d3c 100644
@@ -6826,10 +6826,10 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args *arg)
 	/*
 	 * Check that we don't overflow at later allocations, we request
 	 * clone_sources_count + 1 items, and compare to unsigned long inside
-	 * access_ok.
+	 * access_ok. Also set an upper limit for allocation size so this can't
+	 * easily exhaust memory. Max number of clone sources is about 200K.
 	 */
-	if (arg->clone_sources_count >
-	    ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct clone_root) - 1) {
+	if (arg->clone_sources_count > SZ_8M / sizeof(struct clone_root)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
Signature · 1 line
2.39.0
author maintainer
#3 lore raw

PATCH 4/4 IB/hfi1: Assign npages earlier

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Dean Luick <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f9c47b2caa7ffc903ec950b454b59c209afe3182 ]

Improve code clarity and enable earlier use of
tidbuf->npages by moving its assignment to
structure creation time.

---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c +2 -7
index dab823aac95e1..2619a7a9f27cf 100644
@@ -215,16 +215,11 @@ static void unpin_rcv_pages(struct hfi1_filedata *fd,
 static int pin_rcv_pages(struct hfi1_filedata *fd, struct tid_user_buf *tidbuf)
 {
 	int pinned;
-	unsigned int npages;
+	unsigned int npages = tidbuf->npages;
 	unsigned long vaddr = tidbuf->vaddr;
 	struct page **pages = NULL;
 	struct hfi1_devdata *dd = fd->uctxt->dd;
 
-	/* Get the number of pages the user buffer spans */
-	npages = num_user_pages(vaddr, tidbuf->length);
-	if (!npages)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (npages > fd->uctxt->expected_count) {
 		dd_dev_err(dd, "Expected buffer too big\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -258,7 +253,6 @@ static int pin_rcv_pages(struct hfi1_filedata *fd, struct tid_user_buf *tidbuf)
 		return pinned;
 	}
 	tidbuf->pages = pages;
-	tidbuf->npages = npages;
 	fd->tid_n_pinned += pinned;
 	return pinned;
 }
@@ -334,6 +328,7 @@ int hfi1_user_exp_rcv_setup(struct hfi1_filedata *fd,
 
 	tidbuf->vaddr = tinfo->vaddr;
 	tidbuf->length = tinfo->length;
+	tidbuf->npages = num_user_pages(tidbuf->vaddr, tidbuf->length);
 	tidbuf->psets = kcalloc(uctxt->expected_count, sizeof(*tidbuf->psets),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tidbuf->psets) {
Signature · 1 line
2.39.0