Skip to contentSkip to conversation

dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add KUNBUS GmbH

PATCH In review Bruno Thomsen 2 participants 4 messages Apr 14, 2023 Device tree bindings

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add KUNBUS GmbH

KUNBUS GmbH created the modular DIN-rail mounted open source hardware platform called Revolution Pi for automation and IIoT projects.
https://www.kunbus.com/

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml +2 -0
index ed64e06ecca4..f5e48b49b208 100644
@@ -707,6 +707,8 @@ patternProperties:
     description: Kontron S&T AG
   "^kosagi,.*":
     description: Sutajio Ko-Usagi PTE Ltd.
+  "^kunbus,.*":
+    description: KUNBUS GmbH
   "^kvg,.*":
     description: Kverneland Group
   "^kyo,.*":

base-commit: de4664485abbc0529b1eec44d0061bbfe58a28fb

Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
#2 lore raw

Den fre. 14. apr. 2023 kl. 09.58 skrev Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>:

Quoted 11 lines · Bruno Thomsen
Quoted 6 lines

KUNBUS GmbH created the modular DIN-rail mounted open source hardware platform called Revolution Pi for automation and IIoT projects.
https://www.kunbus.com/

I do not see it being used in current next. We do not document all possible companies in the world. We document prefixes used in bindings.

I am going to use it in the board compatibility string for the Revolution Pi DIN module device tree(s). So I send it separately to avoid spamming the mailing list on every iteration of the board DT. But I can resend it when there is a board patch that uses it.

/Bruno

Quoted 3 lines

Best regards,
Krzysztof

#3 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Bruno Thomsen

Den fre. 14. apr. 2023 kl. 09.58 skrev Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>:

Quoted 9 lines · Bruno Thomsen
Quoted 6 lines

KUNBUS GmbH created the modular DIN-rail mounted open source hardware platform called Revolution Pi for automation and IIoT projects.
https://www.kunbus.com/

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I do not see it being used in current next. We do not document all possible companies in the world. We document prefixes used in bindings.

I am going to use it in the board compatibility string for the Revolution Pi DIN module device tree(s). So I send it separately to avoid spamming the mailing list on every iteration of the board DT. But I can resend it when there is a board patch that uses it.

The best is to send it with the first patchset which introduces it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof