ring name length simplification in ipsec_mb_qp_create_processed_ops_ring
I was looking at places in DPDK that are using rte_strlcpy which should be using strlcpy directly instead. Looking at this code in ipsec_mb, the use of strlcpy is actually not needed at all.
/** Create a ring to place processed operations on */ static struct rte_ring *ipsec_mb_qp_create_processed_ops_ring(
struct ipsec_mb_qp *qp, unsigned int ring_size, int socket_id)
{
struct rte_ring *r;
char ring_name[RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN];
unsigned int n = rte_strlcpy(ring_name, qp->name, sizeof(ring_name));
if (n >= sizeof(ring_name))
return NULL;
r = rte_ring_lookup(ring_name);1. The maximum length name allowed for rte_ring is 30 characters which comes from RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE- sizeof(RTE_RING_MZ_PREFIX) + 1 = 32 - 3 + 1 = 30
2. RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN is 64, qp->name is in struct ipsec_mb_qp is always the same size.
3. Ring create already does a copy of name, so making a copy here is not needed.
Therefore copying the name is not going to ever catch any errors. And if qp->name is too long it won't fail until ring_create().
Would be better to just do something simpler like:
drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c +1 -6
@@ -185,12 +185,7 @@ static struct rte_ring struct ipsec_mb_qp *qp, unsigned int ring_size, int socket_id) { struct rte_ring *r; -char ring_name[RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN ]; - -unsigned int n =rte_strlcpy (ring_name, qp->name,sizeof (ring_name)); - -if (n >=sizeof (ring_name)) -return NULL ; +const char *ring_name = qp->name; r =rte_ring_lookup (ring_name);if (r) {
Ji, Kai
Acked-by Kai JiCan you fix the commit messages with signed-off and Fixes
________________________________
From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Sent: 31 May 2023 00:34
To: Fan Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: ring name length simplification in ipsec_mb_qp_create_processed_ops_ring
I was looking at places in DPDK that are using rte_strlcpy which should be using strlcpy directly instead. Looking at this code in ipsec_mb, the use of strlcpy is actually not needed at all.
/** Create a ring to place processed operations on */ static struct rte_ring *ipsec_mb_qp_create_processed_ops_ring(
struct ipsec_mb_qp *qp, unsigned int ring_size, int socket_id)
{
struct rte_ring *r;
char ring_name[RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN];
unsigned int n = rte_strlcpy(ring_name, qp->name, sizeof(ring_name));
if (n >= sizeof(ring_name))
return NULL;
r = rte_ring_lookup(ring_name);1. The maximum length name allowed for rte_ring is 30 characters which comes from RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE- sizeof(RTE_RING_MZ_PREFIX) + 1 = 32 - 3 + 1 = 30
2. RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN is 64, qp->name is in struct ipsec_mb_qp is always the same size.
3. Ring create already does a copy of name, so making a copy here is not needed.
Therefore copying the name is not going to ever catch any errors. And if qp->name is too long it won't fail until ring_create().
Would be better to just do something simpler like:
drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c +1 -6
@@ -185,12 +185,7 @@ static struct rte_ring struct ipsec_mb_qp *qp, unsigned int ring_size, int socket_id) { struct rte_ring *r; -char ring_name[RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN ]; - -unsigned int n =rte_strlcpy (ring_name, qp->name,sizeof (ring_name)); - -if (n >=sizeof (ring_name)) -return NULL ; +const char *ring_name = qp->name; r =rte_ring_lookup (ring_name);if (r) {