Skip to contentSkip to conversation

soc: mediatek: Explicitly include correct DT includes

PATCH In review Rob Herring 2 participants 2 messages Jul 14, 2023 – Jul 17, 2023 Arm MediaTek

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 soc: mediatek: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes.

---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 1 +
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c       | 2 +-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c       | 3 +--
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c   | 3 ++-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c      | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c +1 -0
index c1837a468267..b0cd071c4719 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h>
 
 #define CMDQ_WRITE_ENABLE_MASK	BIT(0)
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c +1 -1
index bad139cb117e..b28feb967540 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c +1 -1
index 9619faa796e8..ffb75711a1da 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
 #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h>
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c +1 -2
index 4aa0913817ae..9d9f5ae578ac 100644
@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h>
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c +1 -1
index 354249cc1b12..ee962804b830 100644
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_clk.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +2 -1
index 11095b8de71a..efd9cae212dc 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c +1 -1
index 7a668888111c..b374d01fdac7 100644
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
maintainer Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw

Il 14/07/23 19:51, Rob Herring ha scritto:

Quoted 10 lines

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel