FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs: dlm: make F_SETLK use unkillable wait_event" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.14.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 0f2b1cb89ccdbdcedf7143f4153a4da700a05f48
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2023072107-badass-icky-d7c8@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.14.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

0f2b1cb89ccd ("fs: dlm: make F_SETLK use unkillable wait_event") 59e45c758ca1 ("fs: dlm: interrupt posix locks only when process is killed") c847f4e20304 ("fs: dlm: fix cleanup pending ops when interrupted") b92a4e3f86b1 ("fs: dlm: change posix lock sigint handling") 4d413ae9ced4 ("fs: dlm: use dlm_plock_info for do_unlock_close") ea06d4cabf52 ("fs: dlm: change plock interrupted message to debug again") 19d7ca051d30 ("fs: dlm: add pid to debug log")
dc1acd5c9469 ("dlm: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable") bcfad4265ced ("dlm: improve plock logging if interrupted") a800ba77fd28 ("dlm: rearrange async condition return")
bcbb4ba6c9ba ("dlm: cleanup plock_op vs plock_xop")
a559790caa1c ("dlm: replace sanity checks with WARN_ON")
42252d0d2aa9 ("dlm: fix plock invalid read")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 0f2b1cb89ccdbdcedf7143f4153a4da700a05f48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Aring <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 11:21:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fs: dlm: make F_SETLK use unkillable wait_event

While a non-waiting posix lock request (F_SETLK) is waiting for user space processing (in dlm_controld), wait for that processing to complete with an unkillable wait_event(). This makes F_SETLK behave the same way for F_RDLCK, F_WRLCK and F_UNLCK. F_SETLKW continues to use wait_event_killable().

index 31bc601ee3d8..c9e1d5f54194 100644
@@ -155,25 +155,29 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 
 	send_op(op);
 
-	rv = wait_event_killable(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
-	if (rv == -ERESTARTSYS) {
-		spin_lock(&ops_lock);
-		/* recheck under ops_lock if we got a done != 0,
-		 * if so this interrupt case should be ignored
-		 */
-		if (op->done != 0) {
+	if (op->info.wait) {
+		rv = wait_event_killable(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
+		if (rv == -ERESTARTSYS) {
+			spin_lock(&ops_lock);
+			/* recheck under ops_lock if we got a done != 0,
+			 * if so this interrupt case should be ignored
+			 */
+			if (op->done != 0) {
+				spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
+				goto do_lock_wait;
+			}
+			list_del(&op->list);
 			spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
-			goto do_lock_wait;
-		}
-		list_del(&op->list);
-		spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
 
-		log_debug(ls, "%s: wait interrupted %x %llx pid %d",
-			  __func__, ls->ls_global_id,
-			  (unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid);
-		do_unlock_close(&op->info);
-		dlm_release_plock_op(op);
-		goto out;
+			log_debug(ls, "%s: wait interrupted %x %llx pid %d",
+				  __func__, ls->ls_global_id,
+				  (unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid);
+			do_unlock_close(&op->info);
+			dlm_release_plock_op(op);
+			goto out;
+		}
+	} else {
+		wait_event(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
 	}
 
 do_lock_wait: