security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
RFC PATCH 1/2 security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
Add alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or rte_flow packet steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.
Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using rte_flow based packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.
In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on rte_flow rules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.
--- doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 + doc/guides/nics/features.rst | 18 +++++ doc/guides/nics/features/default.ini | 1 + lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 + lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 1 + lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 2 + lib/security/rte_security.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/security/version.map | 1 + 8 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini +1 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Sym raw data path API = Cipher multiple data units = Cipher wrapped key = Inner checksum = +Rx inject = ; ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.
doc/guides/nics/features.rst +18 -0
@@ -443,6 +443,24 @@ protocol operations. See security library and PMD documentation for more details * **[provides] rte_security_ops, capabilities_get**: ``action: RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_INLINE_PROTOCOL`` +.. _nic_features_rx_inject_doc: + +Rx inject +--------- + +Supports Rx inject to handle packets that failed inline protocol offload +processing but need to be handled with same security session. The NIC is +capable of processing the packet same way as regular inline protocol processed +packets and would be received on ethdev queue based on rte_flow rules +configured. + +* **[uses] rte_eth_rxconf,rte_eth_rxmode**: ``offloads:RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SEC_RX_INJECT``, +* **[uses] mbuf**: ``mbuf.l2_len``. +* **[implements] rte_security_ctx**: ``inb_pkt_rx_inject``. +* **[provides] rte_eth_dev_info**: ``rx_offload_capa,rx_queue_offload_capa:RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SEC_RX_INJECT``. +* **[related] API**: ``rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject``. + + .. _nic_features_crc_offload: CRC offload
doc/guides/nics/features/default.ini +1 -0
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Rate limitation = Congestion management = Inline crypto = Inline protocol = +Rx inject = CRC offload = VLAN offload = QinQ offload =
lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h +2 -0
@@ -536,6 +536,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_enum);/**< Support wrapped key in cipher xform */ #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_INNER_CSUM (1ULL << 27)/**< Support inner checksum computation/verification */ +#define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT (1ULL << 28) +/**< Support Rx injection after security processing */ /** * Get the name of a crypto device feature flag
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c +1 -0
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static const struct {RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR (OUTER_UDP_CKSUM ),RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR (RSS_HASH ),RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR (BUFFER_SPLIT ), + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SEC_RX_INJECT), };#undef RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h +2 -0
@@ -1517,6 +1517,8 @@ struct rte_eth_conf {#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM RTE_BIT64(18)#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH RTE_BIT64(19)#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT RTE_BIT64(20) +#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SEC_RX_INJECT RTE_BIT64(21) +#define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SEC_RX_INJECT RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SEC_RX_INJECT#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM (RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | \ RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | \
lib/security/rte_security.h +87 -0
105 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/version.map +1 -0
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { __rte_security_set_pkt_metadata; rte_security_dynfield_offset; + rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject; rte_security_macsec_sa_create; rte_security_macsec_sa_destroy; rte_security_macsec_sa_stats_get;
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
RFC PATCH 2/2 test/cryptodev: add Rx inject test
From: Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>
Add test to verify Rx inject.
--- app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++---- app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
app/test/test_cryptodev.c +273 -53
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@#include <rte_crypto.h> #include <rte_cryptodev.h> +#include <rte_ethdev.h> #include <rte_ip.h> #include <rte_string_fns.h> #include <rte_tcp.h>
@@ -1426,6 +1427,81 @@ ut_setup_security(void)return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); } +static int +ut_setup_security_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool =rte_mempool_lookup ("CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL" ); +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = { + .rxmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM | +RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY , + }, + .txmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE , + }, + .lpbk_mode =1 ,/* Enable loopback */ + }; +struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info; +struct rte_eth_rxconf rx_conf = { + .rx_thresh = { + .pthresh =8 , + .hthresh =8 , + .wthresh =8 , + }, + .rx_free_thresh =32 , + }; +uint16_t nb_ports; +int ret; + +rte_cryptodev_info_get (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ], &dev_info); +if (!(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT )) { +RTE_LOG (INFO ,USER1 ,"Feature requirements for IPsec Rx inject test case not met\n" + ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + nb_ports =rte_eth_dev_count_avail (); +if (nb_ports ==0 ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + ret =rte_eth_dev_configure (0 /* port_id */ , +1 /* nb_rx_queue */ , +0 /* nb_tx_queue */ , + &port_conf); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not configure ethdev port 0 [err=%d]\n" , ret); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Rx queue setup */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_queue_setup (0 /* port_id */ , +0 /* rx_queue_id */ , +1024 /* nb_rx_desc */ , +SOCKET_ID_ANY , + &rx_conf, + mbuf_pool); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not setup eth port 0 queue 0\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_dev_start (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not start ethdev" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_promiscuous_enable (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable promiscuous mode" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Configure and start cryptodev with no features disabled */ +return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); +} +void ut_teardown (void ) {
@@ -1478,6 +1554,21 @@ ut_teardown(void)rte_cryptodev_stop (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); } +static void +ut_teardown_rx_inject (void ) +{ +int ret; + +if (rte_eth_dev_count_avail () !=0 ) { + ret =rte_eth_dev_reset (0 ); +if (ret) +printf ("Could not reset eth port 0" ); + + } + +ut_teardown (); +} +static int test_device_configure_invalid_dev_id (void ) {
@@ -9748,6 +9839,145 @@ test_PDCP_SDAP_PROTO_decap_all(void)return (all_err ==TEST_SUCCESS ) ?TEST_SUCCESS :TEST_FAILED ; } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +struct rte_security_ipsec_xform *ipsec_xform, +const struct ipsec_test_data *td, +const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags, +int pkt_num) +{ +uint8_t dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]; +enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction dir; +int ret; + + dir = ipsec_xform->direction; + +/* Generate crypto op data structure */ + ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, +RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); +if (!ut_params->op) { +printf ("Could not allocate crypto op" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Attach session to operation */ +rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, ut_params->sec_session); + +/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ + ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; + ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; + +/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && + ipsec_xform->options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { +uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, + uint8_t *, +IV_OFFSET ); +int len; + +if (td->aead) + len = td->xform.aead.aead.iv.length; +else if (td->aes_gmac) + len = td->xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; +else + len = td->xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; + +memcpy (iv, td->iv.data, len); + } + +/* Process crypto operation */ +process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); + + ret =test_ipsec_status_check (td, ut_params->op, flags, dir, pkt_num); + +rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); + ut_params->op =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static int +test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +struct rte_security_ctx *ctx) +{ +struct rte_security_session **sec_sess; +struct rte_security_ctx *eth_sec_ctx; +struct rte_ether_hdr *hdr; +struct rte_mbuf *m; +uint64_t timeout; +void *userdata; +int ret; + +RTE_SET_USED (ts_params); + + hdr = (void *)rte_pktmbuf_prepend (ut_params->ibuf,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + hdr->ether_type =rte_cpu_to_be_16 (RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 ); + + ut_params->ibuf->l2_len =sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr ); + + sec_sess = (struct rte_security_session **)&ut_params->sec_session; + ret =rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (ctx, &ut_params->ibuf, sec_sess,1 ); + +if (ret !=1 ) +return TEST_FAILED ; + + ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; + +/* Add a timeout for 1 s */ + timeout =rte_get_tsc_cycles () +rte_get_tsc_hz (); + +do { +/* Get packet from port 0, queue 0 */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_burst (0 ,0 , &m,1 ); + }while ((ret ==0 ) && (rte_get_tsc_cycles () > timeout)); + +if (ret ==0 ) { +printf ("Could not receive packets from ethdev\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m ==NULL ) { +printf ("Received mbuf is NULL\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + + ut_params->ibuf = m; + +if (!(m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD )) { +printf ("Received packet is not Rx security processed\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD_FAILED ) { +printf ("Received packet has failed Rx security processing\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + + eth_sec_ctx =rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx (0 ); +if (eth_sec_ctx ==NULL ) { +printf ("Could not fetch ethdev sec ctx\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* +* 'ut_params' is set as userdata. Verify that the field is returned +* correctly. +*/ + + userdata =rte_security_dynfield (m); +if (userdata != ut_params) { +printf ("Userdata retrieved not matching expected\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Trim L2 header */ +rte_pktmbuf_adj (m,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + +return TEST_SUCCESS ; +} + static int test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], struct ipsec_test_data res_d[],
@@ -9937,6 +10167,9 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], } } +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + sess_conf.userdata = ut_params; +/* Create security session */ ut_params->sec_session =rte_security_session_create (ctx, &sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool);
@@ -9959,58 +10192,29 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],/* Copy test data before modification */ memcpy (input_text, td[i].input_text.data, td[i].input_text.len); -if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) -return TEST_FAILED ; +if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) { + ret =TEST_FAILED ; + goto mbuf_free; + }/* Setup source mbuf payload */ ut_params->ibuf =create_segmented_mbuf (ts_params->mbuf_pool, td[i].input_text.len, nb_segs,0 );pktmbuf_write (ut_params->ibuf,0 , td[i].input_text.len, input_text); -/* Generate crypto op data structure */ - ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, -RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); -if (!ut_params->op) { -printf ("TestCase %s line %d: %s\n" , - __func__, __LINE__, -"failed to allocate crypto op" ); - ret =TEST_FAILED ; - goto crypto_op_free; - } - -/* Attach session to operation */ -rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, - ut_params->sec_session); - -/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ - ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; - ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; - -/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ -if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && - ipsec_xform.options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { -uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, - uint8_t *, -IV_OFFSET ); -int len; - -if (td[i].aead) - len = td[i].xform.aead.aead.iv.length; -else if (td[i].aes_gmac) - len = td[i].xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; -else - len = td[i].xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; - -memcpy (iv, td[i].iv.data, len); - } - -/* Process crypto operation */ -process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && + flags->rx_inject) + ret =test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (ts_params, ut_params, + ctx); +else + ret =test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (ts_params, + ut_params, + &ipsec_xform, + &td[i], flags, + i +1 ); - ret =test_ipsec_status_check (&td[i], ut_params->op, flags, dir, - i +1 );if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free;if (res_d !=NULL ) res_d_tmp = &res_d[i];
@@ -10018,24 +10222,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], ret =test_ipsec_post_process (ut_params->ibuf, &td[i], res_d_tmp, silent, flags);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free; ret =test_ipsec_stats_verify (ctx, ut_params->sec_session, flags, dir);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; - -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; + goto mbuf_free;rte_pktmbuf_free (ut_params->ibuf); ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; } -crypto_op_free: -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; - +mbuf_free:rte_pktmbuf_free (ut_params->ibuf); ut_params->ibuf =NULL ;
@@ -10100,6 +10298,24 @@ test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_fragmented(const void *test_data)return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_outb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject (const void *test_data) +{ +const struct ipsec_test_data *td = test_data; +struct ipsec_test_flags flags; +struct ipsec_test_data td_inb; + +memset (&flags,0 ,sizeof (flags)); + flags.rx_inject = true; + +if (td->ipsec_xform.direction ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS ) +test_ipsec_td_in_from_out (td, &td_inb); +else +memcpy (&td_inb, td,sizeof (td_inb)); + +return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_inb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); +} +static int test_ipsec_proto_all (const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags) {
@@ -16133,6 +16349,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite ipsec_proto_testsuite = { "Tunnel header IPv6 decrement inner hop limit", ut_setup_security, ut_teardown, test_ipsec_proto_ipv6_hop_limit_decrement), +TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA ( +"Inbound known vector (ESP tunnel mode IPv4 AES-GCM 128) Rx inject" , + ut_setup_security_rx_inject, ut_teardown_rx_inject, + test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject, &pkt_aes_128_gcm), TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST( "Multi-segmented mode", ut_setup_security, ut_teardown,
app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h +1 -0
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct ipsec_test_flags {bool ah;uint32_t plaintext_len;int nb_segs_in_mbuf; +bool rx_inject; };struct crypto_param {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Quoted 51 lines
+/**
+ * Perform security processing of packets and do Rx inject after processing.
+ *
+ * Rx inject would behave similarly to ethdev loopback but with the additional
+ * security processing. In case of ethdev loopback, application would be
+ * submitting packets to ethdev Tx queues and would be received as is from
+ * ethdev Rx queues. With Rx inject, packets would be received after security
+ * processing from ethdev Rx queues.
+ *
+ * With inline protocol offload capable ethdevs, Rx injection can be used to
+ * handle packets which failed the regular security Rx path. This can be due to
+ * cases such as outer fragmentation, in which case applications can reassemble
+ * the fragments and then subsequently submit for inbound processing and Rx
+ * injection, so that packets are received as regular security processed
+ * packets.
+ *
+ * With lookaside protocol offload capable cryptodevs, Rx injection can be used
+ * to perform packet parsing after security processing. This would allow for
+ * re-classification after security protocol processing is done. The ethdev port
+ * on which the packet would be received would be based onrte_flowrules
+ * matching the packet after security processing. Also, since the packet would
+ * be identical to an inline protocol processed packet, eth devices should have
+ * security enabled (RTE_ETHDEV_RX_SECURITY_F).
+ *
+ * Since the packet would be received back from ethdev Rx queues, it is expected
+ * that application retains/adds L2 header with the mbuf field 'l2_len'
+ * reflecting the size of L2 header in the packet.
+ *
+ * Ifhash.fdir.hfield is set in mbuf, it would be treated as the value for
+ *MARKpattern for the subsequentrte_flowparsing.
+ *
+ * @param ctx Security ctx
+ * @param pkts The address of an array of *nb_pkts* pointers
to
+ * *rte_mbuf* structures which contain the
packets.
+ * @param sess The address of an array of *nb_pkts* pointers
to
+ * *rte_security_session* structures
corresponding
+ * to each packet.
+ * @paramnb_pktsThe maximum number of packets to process.
+ *
+ * @return+ * The number of packets successfully injected to ethdev Rx. The return + * value can be less than the value of the *nb_pkts* parameter when the + * PMD internal queues have been filled up.+ */
lib/security/rte_security.h rte_security_attach_session(struct rte_crypto_op *op, · line 1048
Quoted 6 lines
lib/security/rte_security.h +6
-0+__rte_experimental +static inline uint16_t +rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (struct rte_security_ctx *ctx, +struct rte_mbuf **pkts, +struct rte_security_session **sess, +uint16_t nb_pkts)
rte_security_session is internal to library and not exposed.
Also security_ctx is planned to be made internal.
Can we make this as non-inline function and add as part of rte_security_op? I believe this is a fallback flow, which means not very performance intensive.
Quoted 27 lines
lib/security/rte_security.h +10
-0+{ +#ifdef RTE_DEBUG +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (ctx,0 ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (ctx->ops,0 ); +RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (ctx->inb_pkt_rx_inject,0 ); +#endif +return ctx->inb_pkt_rx_inject (ctx->device, pkts, sess, nb_pkts); +} + +struct rte_security_macsec_secy_stats {uint64_t ctl_pkt_bcast_cnt;uint64_t ctl_pkt_mcast_cnt;lib/security/version.map +1
-1@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { __rte_security_set_pkt_metadata; rte_security_dynfield_offset; + rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject; rte_security_macsec_sa_create; rte_security_macsec_sa_destroy; rte_security_macsec_sa_stats_get; --2.25.1
PATCH v2 1/2 security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
In reply to Anoob JosephAdd alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or rte_flow packet steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.
Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using rte_flow based packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in inner parsing and flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.
In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on rte_flow rules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.
---
v2:
* Added a new API for configuring security device to do Rx inject to a specific ethdev port
* Rebased
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 + lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 + lib/security/rte_security.c | 22 ++++++ lib/security/rte_security.h | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/security/rte_security_driver.h | 44 +++++++++++ lib/security/version.map | 3 + 6 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini +1 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Sym raw data path API = Cipher multiple data units = Cipher wrapped key = Inner checksum = +Rx inject = ; ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.
lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h +2 -0
@@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_enum);/**< Support wrapped key in cipher xform */ #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_INNER_CSUM (1ULL << 27)/**< Support inner checksum computation/verification */ +#define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT (1ULL << 28) +/**< Support Rx injection after security processing */ /** * Get the name of a crypto device feature flag
lib/security/rte_security.c +22 -0
@@ -321,6 +321,28 @@ rte_security_capability_get(void *ctx, struct rte_security_capability_idx *idx)return NULL ; } +int +rte_security_rx_inject_configure (void *ctx,uint16_t port_id,bool enable) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance, -EINVAL ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops, -ENOTSUP ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops->rx_inject_configure, -ENOTSUP ); + +return instance->ops->rx_inject_configure (instance->device, port_id, enable); +} + +uint16_t +rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (void *ctx,struct rte_mbuf **pkts,void **sess, +uint16_t nb_pkts) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +return instance->ops->inb_pkt_rx_inject (instance->device, pkts, + (struct rte_security_session **)sess, nb_pkts); +} + static int security_handle_cryptodev_list(const char *cmd __rte_unused, const char *params __rte_unused,
lib/security/rte_security.h +85 -0
91 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/rte_security_driver.h +44 -0
56 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/version.map +3 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { rte_security_session_stats_get; rte_security_session_update; rte_security_oop_dynfield_offset; + + rte_security_rx_inject_configure; + rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject; }; INTERNAL {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v2 2/2 test/cryptodev: add Rx inject test
From: Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>
Add test to verify Rx inject. The test case added would push a known vector to cryptodev which would be injected to ethdev Rx. The test case verifies that the packet is received from ethdev Rx and is processed successfully. It also verifies that the userdata matches with the expectation.
--- app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 341 +++++++++++++++++++---- app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
app/test/test_cryptodev.c +288 -53
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@#include <rte_crypto.h> #include <rte_cryptodev.h> +#include <rte_ethdev.h> #include <rte_ip.h> #include <rte_string_fns.h> #include <rte_tcp.h>
@@ -1426,6 +1427,93 @@ ut_setup_security(void)return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); } +static int +ut_setup_security_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool =rte_mempool_lookup ("CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL" ); +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = { + .rxmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM | +RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY , + }, + .txmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE , + }, + .lpbk_mode =1 ,/* Enable loopback */ + }; +struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info; +struct rte_eth_rxconf rx_conf = { + .rx_thresh = { + .pthresh =8 , + .hthresh =8 , + .wthresh =8 , + }, + .rx_free_thresh =32 , + }; +uint16_t nb_ports; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +rte_cryptodev_info_get (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ], &dev_info); +if (!(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT ) || + !(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY )) { +RTE_LOG (INFO ,USER1 ,"Feature requirements for IPsec Rx inject test case not met\n" + ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + nb_ports =rte_eth_dev_count_avail (); +if (nb_ports ==0 ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + ret =rte_eth_dev_configure (0 /* port_id */ , +1 /* nb_rx_queue */ , +0 /* nb_tx_queue */ , + &port_conf); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not configure ethdev port 0 [err=%d]\n" , ret); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Rx queue setup */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_queue_setup (0 /* port_id */ , +0 /* rx_queue_id */ , +1024 /* nb_rx_desc */ , +SOCKET_ID_ANY , + &rx_conf, + mbuf_pool); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not setup eth port 0 queue 0\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , true); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable Rx inject offload" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_dev_start (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not start ethdev" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_promiscuous_enable (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable promiscuous mode" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Configure and start cryptodev with no features disabled */ +return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); +} +void ut_teardown (void ) {
@@ -1478,6 +1566,33 @@ ut_teardown(void)rte_cryptodev_stop (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); } +static void +ut_teardown_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +if (rte_eth_dev_count_avail () !=0 ) { + ret =rte_eth_dev_reset (0 ); +if (ret) +printf ("Could not reset eth port 0" ); + + } + +ut_teardown (); + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return ; + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , false); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not disable Rx inject offload" ); +return ; + } +} +static int test_device_configure_invalid_dev_id (void ) {
@@ -9875,6 +9990,137 @@ ext_mbuf_create(struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, int pkt_len,return NULL ; } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +struct rte_security_ipsec_xform *ipsec_xform, +const struct ipsec_test_data *td, +const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags, +int pkt_num) +{ +uint8_t dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]; +enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction dir; +int ret; + + dir = ipsec_xform->direction; + +/* Generate crypto op data structure */ + ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, +RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); +if (!ut_params->op) { +printf ("Could not allocate crypto op" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Attach session to operation */ +rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, ut_params->sec_session); + +/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ + ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; + ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; + +/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && + ipsec_xform->options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { +uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, + uint8_t *, +IV_OFFSET ); +int len; + +if (td->aead) + len = td->xform.aead.aead.iv.length; +else if (td->aes_gmac) + len = td->xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; +else + len = td->xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; + +memcpy (iv, td->iv.data, len); + } + +/* Process crypto operation */ +process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); + + ret =test_ipsec_status_check (td, ut_params->op, flags, dir, pkt_num); + +rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); + ut_params->op =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static int +test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +void *ctx) +{ +struct rte_ether_hdr *hdr; +struct rte_mbuf *m; +uint64_t timeout; +void **sec_sess; +void *userdata; +int ret; + +RTE_SET_USED (ts_params); + + hdr = (void *)rte_pktmbuf_prepend (ut_params->ibuf,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + hdr->ether_type =rte_cpu_to_be_16 (RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 ); + + ut_params->ibuf->l2_len =sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr ); + + sec_sess = &ut_params->sec_session; + ret =rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (ctx, &ut_params->ibuf, sec_sess,1 ); + +if (ret !=1 ) +return TEST_FAILED ; + + ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; + +/* Add a timeout for 1 s */ + timeout =rte_get_tsc_cycles () +rte_get_tsc_hz (); + +do { +/* Get packet from port 0, queue 0 */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_burst (0 ,0 , &m,1 ); + }while ((ret ==0 ) && (rte_get_tsc_cycles () > timeout)); + +if (ret ==0 ) { +printf ("Could not receive packets from ethdev\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m ==NULL ) { +printf ("Received mbuf is NULL\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + + ut_params->ibuf = m; + +if (!(m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD )) { +printf ("Received packet is not Rx security processed\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD_FAILED ) { +printf ("Received packet has failed Rx security processing\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* +* 'ut_params' is set as userdata. Verify that the field is returned +* correctly. +*/ + userdata = (void *)*rte_security_dynfield (m); +if (userdata != ut_params) { +printf ("Userdata retrieved not matching expected\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Trim L2 header */ +rte_pktmbuf_adj (m,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + +return TEST_SUCCESS ; +} + static int test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], struct ipsec_test_data res_d[],
@@ -10064,6 +10310,9 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], } } +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + sess_conf.userdata = ut_params; +/* Create security session */ ut_params->sec_session =rte_security_session_create (ctx, &sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool);
@@ -10086,8 +10335,10 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],/* Copy test data before modification */ memcpy (input_text, td[i].input_text.data, td[i].input_text.len); -if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) -return TEST_FAILED ; +if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) { + ret =TEST_FAILED ; + goto mbuf_free; + }/* Setup source mbuf payload */ if (flags->use_ext_mbuf) {
@@ -10099,50 +10350,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],pktmbuf_write (ut_params->ibuf,0 , td[i].input_text.len, input_text); } -/* Generate crypto op data structure */ - ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, -RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); -if (!ut_params->op) { -printf ("TestCase %s line %d: %s\n" , - __func__, __LINE__, -"failed to allocate crypto op" ); - ret =TEST_FAILED ; - goto crypto_op_free; - } - -/* Attach session to operation */ -rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, - ut_params->sec_session); - -/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ - ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; - ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; - -/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ -if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && - ipsec_xform.options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { -uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, - uint8_t *, -IV_OFFSET ); -int len; - -if (td[i].aead) - len = td[i].xform.aead.aead.iv.length; -else if (td[i].aes_gmac) - len = td[i].xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; -else - len = td[i].xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; - -memcpy (iv, td[i].iv.data, len); - } - -/* Process crypto operation */ -process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + ret =test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (ts_params, ut_params, + ctx); +else + ret =test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (ts_params, + ut_params, + &ipsec_xform, + &td[i], flags, + i +1 ); - ret =test_ipsec_status_check (&td[i], ut_params->op, flags, dir, - i +1 );if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free;if (res_d !=NULL ) res_d_tmp = &res_d[i];
@@ -10150,24 +10369,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], ret =test_ipsec_post_process (ut_params->ibuf, &td[i], res_d_tmp, silent, flags);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free; ret =test_ipsec_stats_verify (ctx, ut_params->sec_session, flags, dir);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; - -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; + goto mbuf_free;rte_pktmbuf_free (ut_params->ibuf); ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; } -crypto_op_free: -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; - +mbuf_free:if (flags->use_ext_mbuf)ext_mbuf_memzone_free (nb_segs);
@@ -10256,6 +10469,24 @@ test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_fragmented(const void *test_data)return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_outb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject (const void *test_data) +{ +const struct ipsec_test_data *td = test_data; +struct ipsec_test_flags flags; +struct ipsec_test_data td_inb; + +memset (&flags,0 ,sizeof (flags)); + flags.rx_inject = true; + +if (td->ipsec_xform.direction ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS ) +test_ipsec_td_in_from_out (td, &td_inb); +else +memcpy (&td_inb, td,sizeof (td_inb)); + +return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_inb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); +} +static int test_ipsec_proto_all (const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags) {
@@ -16319,6 +16550,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite ipsec_proto_testsuite = { "Multi-segmented external mbuf mode", ut_setup_security, ut_teardown, test_ipsec_proto_sgl_ext_mbuf), +TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA ( +"Inbound known vector (ESP tunnel mode IPv4 AES-GCM 128) Rx inject" , + ut_setup_security_rx_inject, ut_teardown_rx_inject, + test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject, &pkt_aes_128_gcm), TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */ } };
app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h +1 -0
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct ipsec_test_flags {uint32_t plaintext_len;int nb_segs_in_mbuf;bool inb_oop; +bool rx_inject; };struct crypto_param {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v3 1/2 security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
In reply to Anoob JosephAdd alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or rte_flow packet steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.
Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using rte_flow based packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.
In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on rte_flow rules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.
---
v3:
* Resolved compilation error with 32 bit build
v2:
* Added a new API for configuring security device to do Rx inject to a specific ethdev port
* Rebased
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 + lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 + lib/security/rte_security.c | 22 ++++++ lib/security/rte_security.h | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/security/rte_security_driver.h | 44 +++++++++++ lib/security/version.map | 3 + 6 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini +1 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Sym raw data path API = Cipher multiple data units = Cipher wrapped key = Inner checksum = +Rx inject = ; ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.
lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h +2 -0
@@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_enum);/**< Support wrapped key in cipher xform */ #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_INNER_CSUM (1ULL << 27)/**< Support inner checksum computation/verification */ +#define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT (1ULL << 28) +/**< Support Rx injection after security processing */ /** * Get the name of a crypto device feature flag
lib/security/rte_security.c +22 -0
@@ -321,6 +321,28 @@ rte_security_capability_get(void *ctx, struct rte_security_capability_idx *idx)return NULL ; } +int +rte_security_rx_inject_configure (void *ctx,uint16_t port_id,bool enable) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance, -EINVAL ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops, -ENOTSUP ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops->rx_inject_configure, -ENOTSUP ); + +return instance->ops->rx_inject_configure (instance->device, port_id, enable); +} + +uint16_t +rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (void *ctx,struct rte_mbuf **pkts,void **sess, +uint16_t nb_pkts) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +return instance->ops->inb_pkt_rx_inject (instance->device, pkts, + (struct rte_security_session **)sess, nb_pkts); +} + static int security_handle_cryptodev_list(const char *cmd __rte_unused, const char *params __rte_unused,
lib/security/rte_security.h +85 -0
91 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/rte_security_driver.h +44 -0
56 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/version.map +3 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { rte_security_session_stats_get; rte_security_session_update; rte_security_oop_dynfield_offset; + + rte_security_rx_inject_configure; + rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject; }; INTERNAL {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v3 2/2 test/cryptodev: add Rx inject test
From: Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>
Add test to verify Rx inject. The test case added would push a known vector to cryptodev which would be injected to ethdev Rx. The test case verifies that the packet is received from ethdev Rx and is processed successfully. It also verifies that the userdata matches with the expectation.
--- app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 340 +++++++++++++++++++---- app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
app/test/test_cryptodev.c +287 -53
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@#include <rte_crypto.h> #include <rte_cryptodev.h> +#include <rte_ethdev.h> #include <rte_ip.h> #include <rte_string_fns.h> #include <rte_tcp.h>
@@ -1426,6 +1427,93 @@ ut_setup_security(void)return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); } +static int +ut_setup_security_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool =rte_mempool_lookup ("CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL" ); +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = { + .rxmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM | +RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY , + }, + .txmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE , + }, + .lpbk_mode =1 ,/* Enable loopback */ + }; +struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info; +struct rte_eth_rxconf rx_conf = { + .rx_thresh = { + .pthresh =8 , + .hthresh =8 , + .wthresh =8 , + }, + .rx_free_thresh =32 , + }; +uint16_t nb_ports; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +rte_cryptodev_info_get (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ], &dev_info); +if (!(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT ) || + !(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY )) { +RTE_LOG (INFO ,USER1 , +"Feature requirements for IPsec Rx inject test case not met\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + nb_ports =rte_eth_dev_count_avail (); +if (nb_ports ==0 ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + ret =rte_eth_dev_configure (0 /* port_id */ , +1 /* nb_rx_queue */ , +0 /* nb_tx_queue */ , + &port_conf); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not configure ethdev port 0 [err=%d]\n" , ret); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Rx queue setup */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_queue_setup (0 /* port_id */ , +0 /* rx_queue_id */ , +1024 /* nb_rx_desc */ , +SOCKET_ID_ANY , + &rx_conf, + mbuf_pool); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not setup eth port 0 queue 0\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , true); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable Rx inject offload" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_dev_start (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not start ethdev" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_promiscuous_enable (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable promiscuous mode" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Configure and start cryptodev with no features disabled */ +return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); +} +void ut_teardown (void ) {
@@ -1478,6 +1566,33 @@ ut_teardown(void)rte_cryptodev_stop (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); } +static void +ut_teardown_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +if (rte_eth_dev_count_avail () !=0 ) { + ret =rte_eth_dev_reset (0 ); +if (ret) +printf ("Could not reset eth port 0" ); + + } + +ut_teardown (); + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return ; + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , false); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not disable Rx inject offload" ); +return ; + } +} +static int test_device_configure_invalid_dev_id (void ) {
@@ -9875,6 +9990,136 @@ ext_mbuf_create(struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, int pkt_len,return NULL ; } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +struct rte_security_ipsec_xform *ipsec_xform, +const struct ipsec_test_data *td, +const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags, +int pkt_num) +{ +uint8_t dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]; +enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction dir; +int ret; + + dir = ipsec_xform->direction; + +/* Generate crypto op data structure */ + ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, +RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); +if (!ut_params->op) { +printf ("Could not allocate crypto op" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Attach session to operation */ +rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, ut_params->sec_session); + +/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ + ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; + ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; + +/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && + ipsec_xform->options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { +uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, + uint8_t *, +IV_OFFSET ); +int len; + +if (td->aead) + len = td->xform.aead.aead.iv.length; +else if (td->aes_gmac) + len = td->xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; +else + len = td->xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; + +memcpy (iv, td->iv.data, len); + } + +/* Process crypto operation */ +process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); + + ret =test_ipsec_status_check (td, ut_params->op, flags, dir, pkt_num); + +rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); + ut_params->op =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static int +test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +void *ctx) +{ +uint64_t timeout, userdata; +struct rte_ether_hdr *hdr; +struct rte_mbuf *m; +void **sec_sess; +int ret; + +RTE_SET_USED (ts_params); + + hdr = (void *)rte_pktmbuf_prepend (ut_params->ibuf,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + hdr->ether_type =rte_cpu_to_be_16 (RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 ); + + ut_params->ibuf->l2_len =sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr ); + + sec_sess = &ut_params->sec_session; + ret =rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (ctx, &ut_params->ibuf, sec_sess,1 ); + +if (ret !=1 ) +return TEST_FAILED ; + + ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; + +/* Add a timeout for 1 s */ + timeout =rte_get_tsc_cycles () +rte_get_tsc_hz (); + +do { +/* Get packet from port 0, queue 0 */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_burst (0 ,0 , &m,1 ); + }while ((ret ==0 ) && (rte_get_tsc_cycles () > timeout)); + +if (ret ==0 ) { +printf ("Could not receive packets from ethdev\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m ==NULL ) { +printf ("Received mbuf is NULL\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + + ut_params->ibuf = m; + +if (!(m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD )) { +printf ("Received packet is not Rx security processed\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD_FAILED ) { +printf ("Received packet has failed Rx security processing\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* +* 'ut_params' is set as userdata. Verify that the field is returned +* correctly. +*/ + userdata = *(uint64_t *)rte_security_dynfield (m); +if (userdata != (uint64_t )ut_params) { +printf ("Userdata retrieved not matching expected\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Trim L2 header */ +rte_pktmbuf_adj (m,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + +return TEST_SUCCESS ; +} + static int test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], struct ipsec_test_data res_d[],
@@ -10064,6 +10309,9 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], } } +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + sess_conf.userdata = ut_params; +/* Create security session */ ut_params->sec_session =rte_security_session_create (ctx, &sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool);
@@ -10086,8 +10334,10 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],/* Copy test data before modification */ memcpy (input_text, td[i].input_text.data, td[i].input_text.len); -if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) -return TEST_FAILED ; +if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) { + ret =TEST_FAILED ; + goto mbuf_free; + }/* Setup source mbuf payload */ if (flags->use_ext_mbuf) {
@@ -10099,50 +10349,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],pktmbuf_write (ut_params->ibuf,0 , td[i].input_text.len, input_text); } -/* Generate crypto op data structure */ - ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, -RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); -if (!ut_params->op) { -printf ("TestCase %s line %d: %s\n" , - __func__, __LINE__, -"failed to allocate crypto op" ); - ret =TEST_FAILED ; - goto crypto_op_free; - } - -/* Attach session to operation */ -rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, - ut_params->sec_session); - -/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ - ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; - ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; - -/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ -if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && - ipsec_xform.options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { -uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, - uint8_t *, -IV_OFFSET ); -int len; - -if (td[i].aead) - len = td[i].xform.aead.aead.iv.length; -else if (td[i].aes_gmac) - len = td[i].xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; -else - len = td[i].xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; - -memcpy (iv, td[i].iv.data, len); - } - -/* Process crypto operation */ -process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + ret =test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (ts_params, ut_params, + ctx); +else + ret =test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (ts_params, + ut_params, + &ipsec_xform, + &td[i], flags, + i +1 ); - ret =test_ipsec_status_check (&td[i], ut_params->op, flags, dir, - i +1 );if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free;if (res_d !=NULL ) res_d_tmp = &res_d[i];
@@ -10150,24 +10368,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], ret =test_ipsec_post_process (ut_params->ibuf, &td[i], res_d_tmp, silent, flags);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free; ret =test_ipsec_stats_verify (ctx, ut_params->sec_session, flags, dir);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; - -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; + goto mbuf_free;rte_pktmbuf_free (ut_params->ibuf); ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; } -crypto_op_free: -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; - +mbuf_free:if (flags->use_ext_mbuf)ext_mbuf_memzone_free (nb_segs);
@@ -10256,6 +10468,24 @@ test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_fragmented(const void *test_data)return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_outb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject (const void *test_data) +{ +const struct ipsec_test_data *td = test_data; +struct ipsec_test_flags flags; +struct ipsec_test_data td_inb; + +memset (&flags,0 ,sizeof (flags)); + flags.rx_inject = true; + +if (td->ipsec_xform.direction ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS ) +test_ipsec_td_in_from_out (td, &td_inb); +else +memcpy (&td_inb, td,sizeof (td_inb)); + +return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_inb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); +} +static int test_ipsec_proto_all (const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags) {
@@ -16319,6 +16549,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite ipsec_proto_testsuite = { "Multi-segmented external mbuf mode", ut_setup_security, ut_teardown, test_ipsec_proto_sgl_ext_mbuf), +TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA ( +"Inbound known vector (ESP tunnel mode IPv4 AES-GCM 128) Rx inject" , + ut_setup_security_rx_inject, ut_teardown_rx_inject, + test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject, &pkt_aes_128_gcm), TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */ } };
app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h +1 -0
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct ipsec_test_flags {uint32_t plaintext_len;int nb_segs_in_mbuf;bool inb_oop; +bool rx_inject; };struct crypto_param {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Quoted 32 lines
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
Add alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or
rte_flowpacket steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using
rte_flowbased packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on
rte_flowrules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>---
v3:
* Resolved compilation error with 32 bit build
Series Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
Please add release notes for the new feature.
PATCH v4 1/2 security: add fallback security processing and Rx inject
In reply to Anoob JosephAdd alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or rte_flow packet steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.
Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using rte_flow based packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.
In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on rte_flow rules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.
---
v4:
Updated release notes
v3:
* Resolved compilation error with 32 bit build
v2:
* Added a new API for configuring security device to do Rx inject to a specific ethdev port
* Rebased
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 + doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst | 19 +++++ lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 + lib/security/rte_security.c | 22 ++++++ lib/security/rte_security.h | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/security/rte_security_driver.h | 44 +++++++++++ lib/security/version.map | 3 + 7 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini +1 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Sym raw data path API = Cipher multiple data units = Cipher wrapped key = Inner checksum = +Rx inject = ; ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst +19 -0
@@ -107,6 +107,25 @@ New Features enhancements to ``rte_crypto_op`` fields to handle all datapath requirements of TLS and DTLS. The support is added for TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.2. +* **Added support for rte_security Rx inject API.** + + Added Rx inject API to allow applications to submit packets for protocol + offload and have them injected back to ethdev Rx so that further ethdev Rx + actions (IP reassembly, packet parsing and flow lookups) can happen based on + inner packet. + + The API when implemented by an ethdev, may be used to process packets that the + application wants to process with inline protocol offload enabled rte_security + session. These can be packets that are received from other non-inline capable + ethdevs or can be packets that failed inline protocol offload (such as + receiving fragmented ESP packets in case of inline IPsec offload). + + The API when implemented by a cryptodev, can be used for injecting packets to + ethdev Rx after IPsec processing and take advantage of ethdev Rx processing + for the inner packet. The API helps application to avail ethdev Rx actions + based on inner packet while working with rte_security sessions which cannot + be accelerated in inline protocol offload mode. + * **Updated ipsec_mb crypto driver.** Added support for digest encrypted to AESNI_MB asynchronous crypto driver.
lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h +2 -0
@@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_enum);/**< Support wrapped key in cipher xform */ #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_INNER_CSUM (1ULL << 27)/**< Support inner checksum computation/verification */ +#define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT (1ULL << 28) +/**< Support Rx injection after security processing */ /** * Get the name of a crypto device feature flag
lib/security/rte_security.c +22 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,28 @@ rte_security_capability_get(void *ctx, struct rte_security_capability_idx *idx)return NULL ; } +int +rte_security_rx_inject_configure (void *ctx,uint16_t port_id,bool enable) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance, -EINVAL ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops, -ENOTSUP ); +RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET (instance->ops->rx_inject_configure, -ENOTSUP ); + +return instance->ops->rx_inject_configure (instance->device, port_id, enable); +} + +uint16_t +rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (void *ctx,struct rte_mbuf **pkts,void **sess, +uint16_t nb_pkts) +{ +struct rte_security_ctx *instance = ctx; + +return instance->ops->inb_pkt_rx_inject (instance->device, pkts, + (struct rte_security_session **)sess, nb_pkts); +} + static int security_handle_cryptodev_list(const char *cmd __rte_unused, const char *params __rte_unused,
lib/security/rte_security.h +85 -0
91 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/rte_security_driver.h +44 -0
56 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/security/version.map +3 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { rte_security_session_stats_get; rte_security_session_update; rte_security_oop_dynfield_offset; + + rte_security_rx_inject_configure; + rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject; }; INTERNAL {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v4 2/2 test/cryptodev: add Rx inject test
From: Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>
Add test to verify Rx inject. The test case added would push a known vector to cryptodev which would be injected to ethdev Rx. The test case verifies that the packet is received from ethdev Rx and is processed successfully. It also verifies that the userdata matches with the expectation.
--- app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 340 +++++++++++++++++++---- app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
app/test/test_cryptodev.c +287 -53
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@#include <rte_crypto.h> #include <rte_cryptodev.h> +#include <rte_ethdev.h> #include <rte_ip.h> #include <rte_string_fns.h> #include <rte_tcp.h>
@@ -1426,6 +1427,93 @@ ut_setup_security(void)return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); } +static int +ut_setup_security_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool =rte_mempool_lookup ("CRYPTO_MBUFPOOL" ); +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = { + .rxmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM | +RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY , + }, + .txmode = { + .offloads =RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE , + }, + .lpbk_mode =1 ,/* Enable loopback */ + }; +struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info; +struct rte_eth_rxconf rx_conf = { + .rx_thresh = { + .pthresh =8 , + .hthresh =8 , + .wthresh =8 , + }, + .rx_free_thresh =32 , + }; +uint16_t nb_ports; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +rte_cryptodev_info_get (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ], &dev_info); +if (!(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_RX_INJECT ) || + !(dev_info.feature_flags &RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY )) { +RTE_LOG (INFO ,USER1 , +"Feature requirements for IPsec Rx inject test case not met\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + nb_ports =rte_eth_dev_count_avail (); +if (nb_ports ==0 ) +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + + ret =rte_eth_dev_configure (0 /* port_id */ , +1 /* nb_rx_queue */ , +0 /* nb_tx_queue */ , + &port_conf); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not configure ethdev port 0 [err=%d]\n" , ret); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Rx queue setup */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_queue_setup (0 /* port_id */ , +0 /* rx_queue_id */ , +1024 /* nb_rx_desc */ , +SOCKET_ID_ANY , + &rx_conf, + mbuf_pool); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not setup eth port 0 queue 0\n" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , true); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable Rx inject offload" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_dev_start (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not start ethdev" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + + ret =rte_eth_promiscuous_enable (0 ); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not enable promiscuous mode" ); +return TEST_SKIPPED ; + } + +/* Configure and start cryptodev with no features disabled */ +return dev_configure_and_start (0 ); +} +void ut_teardown (void ) {
@@ -1478,6 +1566,33 @@ ut_teardown(void)rte_cryptodev_stop (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); } +static void +ut_teardown_rx_inject (void ) +{ +struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; +void *sec_ctx; +int ret; + +if (rte_eth_dev_count_avail () !=0 ) { + ret =rte_eth_dev_reset (0 ); +if (ret) +printf ("Could not reset eth port 0" ); + + } + +ut_teardown (); + + sec_ctx =rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx (ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]); +if (sec_ctx ==NULL ) +return ; + + ret =rte_security_rx_inject_configure (sec_ctx,0 , false); +if (ret) { +printf ("Could not disable Rx inject offload" ); +return ; + } +} +static int test_device_configure_invalid_dev_id (void ) {
@@ -9875,6 +9990,136 @@ ext_mbuf_create(struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, int pkt_len,return NULL ; } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +struct rte_security_ipsec_xform *ipsec_xform, +const struct ipsec_test_data *td, +const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags, +int pkt_num) +{ +uint8_t dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0 ]; +enum rte_security_ipsec_sa_direction dir; +int ret; + + dir = ipsec_xform->direction; + +/* Generate crypto op data structure */ + ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, +RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); +if (!ut_params->op) { +printf ("Could not allocate crypto op" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Attach session to operation */ +rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, ut_params->sec_session); + +/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ + ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; + ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; + +/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && + ipsec_xform->options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { +uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, + uint8_t *, +IV_OFFSET ); +int len; + +if (td->aead) + len = td->xform.aead.aead.iv.length; +else if (td->aes_gmac) + len = td->xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; +else + len = td->xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; + +memcpy (iv, td->iv.data, len); + } + +/* Process crypto operation */ +process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); + + ret =test_ipsec_status_check (td, ut_params->op, flags, dir, pkt_num); + +rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); + ut_params->op =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static int +test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params, +struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params, +void *ctx) +{ +uint64_t timeout, userdata; +struct rte_ether_hdr *hdr; +struct rte_mbuf *m; +void **sec_sess; +int ret; + +RTE_SET_USED (ts_params); + + hdr = (void *)rte_pktmbuf_prepend (ut_params->ibuf,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + hdr->ether_type =rte_cpu_to_be_16 (RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 ); + + ut_params->ibuf->l2_len =sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr ); + + sec_sess = &ut_params->sec_session; + ret =rte_security_inb_pkt_rx_inject (ctx, &ut_params->ibuf, sec_sess,1 ); + +if (ret !=1 ) +return TEST_FAILED ; + + ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; + +/* Add a timeout for 1 s */ + timeout =rte_get_tsc_cycles () +rte_get_tsc_hz (); + +do { +/* Get packet from port 0, queue 0 */ + ret =rte_eth_rx_burst (0 ,0 , &m,1 ); + }while ((ret ==0 ) && (rte_get_tsc_cycles () > timeout)); + +if (ret ==0 ) { +printf ("Could not receive packets from ethdev\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m ==NULL ) { +printf ("Received mbuf is NULL\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + + ut_params->ibuf = m; + +if (!(m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD )) { +printf ("Received packet is not Rx security processed\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +if (m->ol_flags &RTE_MBUF_F_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD_FAILED ) { +printf ("Received packet has failed Rx security processing\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* +* 'ut_params' is set as userdata. Verify that the field is returned +* correctly. +*/ + userdata = *(uint64_t *)rte_security_dynfield (m); +if (userdata != (uint64_t )ut_params) { +printf ("Userdata retrieved not matching expected\n" ); +return TEST_FAILED ; + } + +/* Trim L2 header */ +rte_pktmbuf_adj (m,sizeof (struct rte_ether_hdr )); + +return TEST_SUCCESS ; +} + static int test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], struct ipsec_test_data res_d[],
@@ -10064,6 +10309,9 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], } } +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + sess_conf.userdata = ut_params; +/* Create security session */ ut_params->sec_session =rte_security_session_create (ctx, &sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool);
@@ -10086,8 +10334,10 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],/* Copy test data before modification */ memcpy (input_text, td[i].input_text.data, td[i].input_text.len); -if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) -return TEST_FAILED ; +if (test_ipsec_pkt_update (input_text, flags)) { + ret =TEST_FAILED ; + goto mbuf_free; + }/* Setup source mbuf payload */ if (flags->use_ext_mbuf) {
@@ -10099,50 +10349,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[],pktmbuf_write (ut_params->ibuf,0 , td[i].input_text.len, input_text); } -/* Generate crypto op data structure */ - ut_params->op =rte_crypto_op_alloc (ts_params->op_mpool, -RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC ); -if (!ut_params->op) { -printf ("TestCase %s line %d: %s\n" , - __func__, __LINE__, -"failed to allocate crypto op" ); - ret =TEST_FAILED ; - goto crypto_op_free; - } - -/* Attach session to operation */ -rte_security_attach_session (ut_params->op, - ut_params->sec_session); - -/* Set crypto operation mbufs */ - ut_params->op->sym->m_src = ut_params->ibuf; - ut_params->op->sym->m_dst =NULL ; - -/* Copy IV in crypto operation when IV generation is disabled */ -if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS && - ipsec_xform.options.iv_gen_disable ==1 ) { -uint8_t *iv =rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset (ut_params->op, - uint8_t *, -IV_OFFSET ); -int len; - -if (td[i].aead) - len = td[i].xform.aead.aead.iv.length; -else if (td[i].aes_gmac) - len = td[i].xform.chain.auth.auth.iv.length; -else - len = td[i].xform.chain.cipher.cipher.iv.length; - -memcpy (iv, td[i].iv.data, len); - } - -/* Process crypto operation */ -process_crypto_request (dev_id, ut_params->op); +if (dir ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS && flags->rx_inject) + ret =test_ipsec_proto_mbuf_enq (ts_params, ut_params, + ctx); +else + ret =test_ipsec_proto_crypto_op_enq (ts_params, + ut_params, + &ipsec_xform, + &td[i], flags, + i +1 ); - ret =test_ipsec_status_check (&td[i], ut_params->op, flags, dir, - i +1 );if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free;if (res_d !=NULL ) res_d_tmp = &res_d[i];
@@ -10150,24 +10368,18 @@ test_ipsec_proto_process(const struct ipsec_test_data td[], ret =test_ipsec_post_process (ut_params->ibuf, &td[i], res_d_tmp, silent, flags);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; + goto mbuf_free; ret =test_ipsec_stats_verify (ctx, ut_params->sec_session, flags, dir);if (ret !=TEST_SUCCESS ) - goto crypto_op_free; - -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; + goto mbuf_free;rte_pktmbuf_free (ut_params->ibuf); ut_params->ibuf =NULL ; } -crypto_op_free: -rte_crypto_op_free (ut_params->op); - ut_params->op =NULL ; - +mbuf_free:if (flags->use_ext_mbuf)ext_mbuf_memzone_free (nb_segs);
@@ -10256,6 +10468,24 @@ test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_fragmented(const void *test_data)return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_outb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); } +static int +test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject (const void *test_data) +{ +const struct ipsec_test_data *td = test_data; +struct ipsec_test_flags flags; +struct ipsec_test_data td_inb; + +memset (&flags,0 ,sizeof (flags)); + flags.rx_inject = true; + +if (td->ipsec_xform.direction ==RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS ) +test_ipsec_td_in_from_out (td, &td_inb); +else +memcpy (&td_inb, td,sizeof (td_inb)); + +return test_ipsec_proto_process (&td_inb,NULL ,1 , false, &flags); +} +static int test_ipsec_proto_all (const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags) {
@@ -16319,6 +16549,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite ipsec_proto_testsuite = { "Multi-segmented external mbuf mode", ut_setup_security, ut_teardown, test_ipsec_proto_sgl_ext_mbuf), +TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA ( +"Inbound known vector (ESP tunnel mode IPv4 AES-GCM 128) Rx inject" , + ut_setup_security_rx_inject, ut_teardown_rx_inject, + test_ipsec_proto_known_vec_inb_rx_inject, &pkt_aes_128_gcm), TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */ } };
app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.h +1 -0
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct ipsec_test_flags {uint32_t plaintext_len;int nb_segs_in_mbuf;bool inb_oop; +bool rx_inject; };struct crypto_param {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Akhil Goyal
AppliedQuoted 104 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 4:02 PM
To: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Konstantin Ananyev <[email protected]>
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Ciara Power <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] security: add fallback security processing and Rx injectAdd alternate datapath API for security processing which would do Rx injection (similar to loopback) after successful security processing.
With inline protocol offload, variable part of the session context (AR windows, lifetime etc in case of IPsec), is not accessible to the application. If packets are not getting processed in the inline path due to non security reasons (such as outer fragmentation or
rte_flowpacket steering limitations), then the packet cannot be security processed as the session context is private to the PMD and security library doesn't provide alternate APIs to make use of the same session.Introduce new API and Rx injection as fallback mechanism to security processing failures due to non-security reasons. For example, when there is outer fragmentation and PMD doesn't support reassembly of outer fragments, application would receive fragments which it can then reassemble. Post successful reassembly, packet can be submitted for security processing and Rx inject. The packets can be then received in the application as normal inline protocol processed packets.
Same API can be leveraged in lookaside protocol offload mode to inject packet to Rx. This would help in using
rte_flowbased packet parsing after security processing. For example, with IPsec, this will help in flow splitting after IPsec processing is done.In both inline protocol capable ethdevs and lookaside protocol capable cryptodevs, the packet would be received back in eth port & queue based on
rte_flowrules and packet parsing after security processing. The API would behave like a loopback but with the additional security processing.Signed-off-by Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Vidya Sagar Velumuri <[email protected]>Acked-by Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>---
v4:
Updated release notesv3:
* Resolved compilation error with 32 bit buildv2:
* Added a new API for configuring security device to do Rx inject to a specific ethdev port
* Rebaseddoc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 + doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst | 19 +++++ lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 + lib/security/rte_security.c | 22 ++++++ lib/security/rte_security.h | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/security/rte_security_driver.h | 44 +++++++++++ lib/security/version.map | 3 + 7 files changed, 176 insertions(+)doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini +1
-0@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Sym raw data path API = Cipher multiple data units = Cipher wrapped key = Inner checksum = +Rx inject = ; ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst +8
-0@@ -107,6 +107,25 @@ New Features enhancements to ``rte_crypto_op`` fields to handle all datapath requirements of TLS and DTLS. The support is added for TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.2. +* **Added support for rte_security Rx inject API.** + + Added Rx inject API to allow applications to submit packets for protocol + offload and have them injected back to ethdev Rx so that further ethdev Rx + actions (IP reassembly, packet parsing and flow lookups) can happen based on + inner packet. + + The API when implemented by an ethdev, may be used to process packets thatthe
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst +6
-0+ application wants to process with inline protocol offload enabled rte_security + session. These can be packets that are received from other non-inline capable + ethdevs or can be packets that failed inline protocol offload (such as + receiving fragmented ESP packets in case of inline IPsec offload). + + The API when implemented by a cryptodev, can be used for injecting packetsto
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst New Features · line 128
Quoted 5 lines
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst +5
-0+ ethdev Rx after IPsec processing and take advantage of ethdev Rx processing + for the inner packet. The API helps application to avail ethdev Rx actions + based on inner packet while working with rte_security sessions which cannot + be accelerated in inline protocol offload mode. +
Reworded the above release notes as below.
* **Added support for rte_security Rx inject API.**
Added Rx inject API to allow applications to submit packets for protocol offload and have them injected back to ethdev Rx so that further ethdev Rx actions (IP reassembly, packet parsing and flow lookups) can happen based on inner packet.
The API when implemented by an ethdev, application would be able to process packets that are received without/failed inline offload processing (such as fragmented ESP packets with inline IPsec offload).
The API when implemented by a cryptodev, can be used for injecting packets to ethdev Rx after IPsec processing and take advantage of ethdev Rx actions for the inner packet which cannot be accelerated in inline protocol offload mode.
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
Thanks.