wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by
PATCH 1/1 wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.
--- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +1 -1
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {u8 fver;u8 tbl_num; -u8 buf[]; + u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num); } __packed;struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg {
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Quoted 9 lines · Kees Cook
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_byattribute. Flexible array members annotated with__counted_bycan have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).As found with Coccinelle[1], add
__counted_byfor structrtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.
Quoted 7 lines
Cc Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>Cc Kalle Valo <[email protected]>Cc "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Gustavo
Quoted 17 lines
--- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +1
-1@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {u8 fver;u8 tbl_num; -u8 buf[]; + u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num); } __packed;struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg {
Ping-Ke Shih
maintainerQuoted 26 lines · Kees Cook
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_byattribute. Flexible array members annotated with__counted_bycan have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).As found with Coccinelle[1], add
__counted_byfor structrtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.Cc Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>Cc Kalle Valo <[email protected]>Cc "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +0
-0
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report { · line 240
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +1
-1@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {u8 fver;u8 tbl_num; -u8 buf[]; + u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
This struct isn't defined properly. It should be
struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
u8 fver;
u8 tbl_num;
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot tbl[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
} __packed;And, we should modify rtw89_btc_fw_set_slots() as well.
Another struct 'rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg' has similar problem.
So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week.
By the way, I have question about __counted_by(). Can I apply it to little/big- endian 'num'? Like
struct foo {
...
__le32 num;
__le32 data[] __counted_by(num);
}Quoted 6 lines
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +0
-1} __packed;struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg { --2.34.1
Quoted 41 lines · Ping-Ke Shih
Quoted 26 lines · Kees Cook
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_byattribute. Flexible array members annotated with__counted_bycan have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).As found with Coccinelle[1], add
__counted_byfor structrtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.Cc Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>Cc Kalle Valo <[email protected]>Cc "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +0
-0drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report { · line 240
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +1
-1@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {u8 fver;u8 tbl_num; -u8 buf[]; + u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);This struct isn't defined properly. It should be
struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table { u8 fver; u8 tbl_num; struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot tbl[] __counted_by(tbl_num); } __packed;
Quoted 5 lines
And, we should modify
rtw89_btc_fw_set_slots()as well.Another struct '
rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg' has similar problem.So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week.
Ah-ha; thank you!
Quoted 8 lines
By the way, I have question about
__counted_by(). Can I apply it to little/big- endian 'num'? Likestruct foo { ... __le32 num; __le32 data[] __counted_by(num); }
Unfortunately not yet. I hope to see it extended in the future to allow for arbitrary expressions. For this first step, it only handles native sizes.
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
Ping-Ke Shih
maintainerHi Kees,
Quoted 9 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 12:56 AM
To: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate structrtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_tablewith__counted_by
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines · Ping-Ke Shih
On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 13:17 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week.
Ah-ha; thank you!
I have sent two patches [1]. Please help to review and Cc people if needed.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/[email protected]/T/#t