Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm/damon/core: check apply interval in

PATCH Superseded SeongJae Park 1 participant 2 messages Feb 4, 2024 – Feb 5, 2024

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

SeongJae Park

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mm/damon/core: check apply interval in

kdamond_apply_schemes() checks apply intervals of schemes and avoid further applying any schemes if no scheme passed its apply interval. However, the following schemes applying function, damon_do_apply_schemes() iterates all schemes without the apply interval check. As a result, the shortest apply interval is applied to all schemes. Fix the problem by checking the apply interval in damon_do_apply_schemes().

Fixes 42f994b71404 ("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.7.x
---
 mm/damon/core.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
mm/damon/core.c +11 -4
index 0c144fb466b8..f444734cc613 100644
@@ -1064,6 +1064,9 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
 	damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
 		struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
 
+		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
+			continue;
+
 		if (!s->wmarks.activated)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1216,10 +1219,6 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
 		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
 			continue;
 
-		s->next_apply_sis +=
-			(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
-			 c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
-
 		if (!s->wmarks.activated)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1235,6 +1234,14 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
 		damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t)
 			damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);
 	}
+
+	damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
+		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
+			continue;
+		s->next_apply_sis +=
+			(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
+			 c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
+	}
 }
 
 /*
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

I mistakenly broke the subject of the patch. I will send the complete one again.

Quoted 57 lines · On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 12:49:46 -0800 SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote:

kdamond_apply_schemes() checks apply intervals of schemes and avoid further applying any schemes if no scheme passed its apply interval. However, the following schemes applying function, damon_do_apply_schemes() iterates all schemes without the apply interval check. As a result, the shortest apply interval is applied to all schemes. Fix the problem by checking the apply interval in damon_do_apply_schemes().

Fixes 42f994b71404 ("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.7.x
---
 mm/damon/core.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
mm/damon/core.c +11 -4
index 0c144fb466b8..f444734cc613 100644
@@ -1064,6 +1064,9 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
 	damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
 		struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
 
+		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
+			continue;
+
 		if (!s->wmarks.activated)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1216,10 +1219,6 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
 		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
 			continue;
 
-		s->next_apply_sis +=
-			(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
-			 c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
-
 		if (!s->wmarks.activated)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1235,6 +1234,14 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
 		damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t)
 			damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);
 	}
+
+	damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
+		if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
+			continue;
+		s->next_apply_sis +=
+			(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
+			 c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
+	}
 }
 
 /*
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2