wifi: mt76: inititalize sband.band to correct value
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 wifi: mt76: inititalize sband.band to correct value
Set phy->sband_{2,5,6}g.sband.band to the correct enum value, otherwise the ieee80211_register_hw() will fail to register the device.
--- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c +3 -0
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_2g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ] = &phy->sband_2g.sband; + phy->sband_2g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_2g, mt76_channels_2ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_2ghz), rates,
@@ -374,6 +375,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_5g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates, bool vht) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ ] = &phy->sband_5g.sband; + phy->sband_5g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_5GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_5g, mt76_channels_5ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_5ghz), rates,
@@ -385,6 +387,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_6g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_6GHZ ] = &phy->sband_6g.sband; + phy->sband_6g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_6GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_6g, mt76_channels_6ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_6ghz), rates,
--
2.39.2
When using linux-next-20240205 my mediatek wifi device failed to start. A bisection led to commit f04d2c247e0407 as the problem:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218466
After closer examination of the mt76 code it the problem was to to be the incomplete initialization of phy->sband_{2,5,6}g. The band field has to be set to not confuse the new mac80211 code. (the sband_2g structure was correctly initialized accidendly as NL80211_BAND_2GHZ is 0).
Bert Karwatzki
Quoted 4 lines · Bert Karwatzki
Set phy->sband_{2,5,6}g.sband.band to the correct enum value, otherwise the
ieee80211_register_hw()will fail to register the device.
s/Fixes/Closes/
Signature · 3 lines
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
PATCH 1/1 wifi: mt76: inititalize sband.band to correct value
Set phy->sband_{2,5,6}g.sband.band to the correct enum value, otherwise the ieee80211_register_hw() will fail to register the device.
--- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c +3 -0
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_2g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ] = &phy->sband_2g.sband; + phy->sband_2g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_2g, mt76_channels_2ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_2ghz), rates,
@@ -374,6 +375,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_5g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates, bool vht) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ ] = &phy->sband_5g.sband; + phy->sband_5g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_5GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_5g, mt76_channels_5ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_5ghz), rates,
@@ -385,6 +387,7 @@ mt76_init_sband_6g(struct mt76_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_rate *rates, int n_rates) { phy->hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_6GHZ ] = &phy->sband_6g.sband; + phy->sband_6g.sband.band =NL80211_BAND_6GHZ ; return mt76_init_sband(phy, &phy->sband_6g, mt76_channels_6ghz, ARRAY_SIZE(mt76_channels_6ghz), rates,
--
2.39.2
It's "Fixes" for commits and "Closes" for bugs, ain't it?
Bert Karwatzki
Johannes Berg
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · Bert Karwatzki
Set phy->sband_{2,5,6}g.sband.band to the correct enum value, otherwise the
ieee80211_register_hw()will fail to register the device.
So turns out that technically, it wasn't needed before because cfg80211 *will* set sband->band, but *mac80211* now requires it to have been set before ...
We could do a trivial fix in mac80211 as well:
net/mac80211/main.c +1 -1
@@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ int ieee80211_register_hw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) supp_he = supp_he || iftd->he_cap.has_he; supp_eht = supp_eht || iftd->eht_cap.has_eht; -if (sband->band ==NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ) +if (band ==NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ) he_40_mhz_cap =IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_CHANNEL_WIDTH_SET_40MHZ_IN_2G ;else
but seems like no other driver even likely needed this, and it's probably less reliable in the long term?
Or do both?
johannes