gpio: cdev: label sanitization fixes
Subsystems (3)
v2 cover gpio: cdev: label sanitization fixes
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This series fixes a couple of bugs in the sanitization of labels being passed to irq.
Patch 1 fixes the case where userspace provides empty labels.
Patch 2 fixes a missed path in the sanitization changes that can result in memory corruption.
v1 -> v2:
- switched the order of the patches in order to avoid introducing buggy code in one just to fix it in the second
Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
gpio: cdev: check for NULL labels when sanitizing them for irqs
Kent Gibson (1):
gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing in debounce_setup()
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
PATCH v2 1/2 gpio: cdev: check for NULL labels when sanitizing them for irqs
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
We need to take into account that a line's consumer label may be NULL and not try to kstrdup() it in that case but rather pass the NULL pointer up the stack to the interrupt request function.
To that end: let make_irq_label() return NULL as a valid return value and use ERR_PTR() instead to signal an allocation failure to callers.
--- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +14 -5
@@ -1085,7 +1085,16 @@ static u32 gpio_v2_line_config_debounce_period(struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc,static inline char *make_irq_label (const char *orig) { -return kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL ); +char *new; + +if (!orig) +return NULL ; + + new =kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!new) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + +return new; }static inline void free_irq_label (const char *label)
@@ -1158,8 +1167,8 @@ static int edge_detector_setup(struct line *line, irqflags |=IRQF_ONESHOT ; label =make_irq_label (line->req->label); -if (!label) -return -ENOMEM ; +if (IS_ERR (label)) +return PTR_ERR (label);/* Request a thread to read the events */ ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, edge_irq_handler, edge_irq_thread,
@@ -2217,8 +2226,8 @@ static int lineevent_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) goto out_free_le; label =make_irq_label (le->label); -if (!label) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; +if (IS_ERR (label)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (label); goto out_free_le; }
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: cdev: check for NULL labels when sanitizing them for irqs
Quoted 10 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
We need to take into account that a line's consumer label may be NULL and not try to
kstrdup()it in that case but rather pass the NULL pointer up the stack to the interrupt request function.To that end: let
make_irq_label()return NULL as a valid return value and useERR_PTR()instead to signal an allocation failure to callers.
Quoted 6 lines
Fixes b34490879baa ("gpio: cdev: sanitize the label before requesting the interrupt")Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>---
PATCH v2 2/2 gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing in debounce_setup()
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Kent Gibson <[email protected]>
When adding sanitization of the label, the path through edge_detector_setup() that leads to debounce_setup() was overlooked. A request taking this path does not allocate a new label and the request label is freed twice when the request is released, resulting in memory corruption.
Add label sanitization to debounce_setup().
--- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +27 -20
@@ -728,6 +728,25 @@ static u32 line_event_id(int level)GPIO_V2_LINE_EVENT_FALLING_EDGE ; } +static inline char *make_irq_label (const char *orig) +{ +char *new; + +if (!orig) +return NULL ; + + new =kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!new) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + +return new; +} + +static inline void free_irq_label (const char *label) +{ +kfree (label); +} +#ifdef CONFIG_HTE static enum hte_return process_hw_ts_thread (void *p)
@@ -1015,6 +1034,7 @@ static int debounce_setup(struct line *line, unsigned int debounce_period_us) {unsigned long irqflags;int ret, level, irq; +char *label;/* try hardware */ ret =gpiod_set_debounce (line->desc, debounce_period_us);
@@ -1037,11 +1057,17 @@ static int debounce_setup(struct line *line, unsigned int debounce_period_us)if (irq <0 )return -ENXIO ; + label =make_irq_label (line->req->label); +if (IS_ERR (label)) +return -ENOMEM ; + irqflags =IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING ; ret =request_irq (irq, debounce_irq_handler, irqflags, line->req->label, line); -if (ret) +if (ret) { +free_irq_label (label);return ret; + } line->irq = irq; }else { ret =hte_edge_setup (line,GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_BOTH );
@@ -1083,25 +1109,6 @@ static u32 gpio_v2_line_config_debounce_period(struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc,return 0 ; } -static inline char *make_irq_label (const char *orig) -{ -char *new; - -if (!orig) -return NULL ; - - new =kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!new) -return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - -return new; -} - -static inline void free_irq_label (const char *label) -{ -kfree (label); -} -static void edge_detector_stop (struct line *line) {if (line->irq) {
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing in debounce_setup()
Quoted 9 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Kent Gibson <[email protected]>
When adding sanitization of the label, the path through
edge_detector_setup()that leads todebounce_setup()was overlooked. A request taking this path does not allocate a new label and the request label is freed twice when the request is released, resulting in memory corruption.Add label sanitization to
debounce_setup().
...
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +8
-0+static inline char *make_irq_label (const char *orig) +{ +char *new; + +if (!orig) +return NULL ; + + new =kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL );
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c static u32 line_event_id(int level) · line 748
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +10
-0+if (!new) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + +return new; +} + +static inline void free_irq_label (const char *label) +{ +kfree (label); +}
First of all this could have been done in the previous patch already, but okay.
...
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c static int debounce_setup(struct line *line, unsigned int debounce_period_us) · line 1066
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +4
-0+ label =make_irq_label (line->req->label); +if (IS_ERR (label)) +return -ENOMEM ; + irqflags =IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING ; ret =request_irq (irq, debounce_irq_handler, irqflags, line->req->label, line);
But the main point how does this change fix anything?
Shouldn't be
- line->req->label, line);
+ label, line);
?
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +3
-0+if (ret) { +free_irq_label (label);return ret; + }
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing in debounce_setup()
Quoted 49 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 9 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Kent Gibson <[email protected]>
When adding sanitization of the label, the path through
edge_detector_setup()that leads todebounce_setup()was overlooked. A request taking this path does not allocate a new label and the request label is freed twice when the request is released, resulting in memory corruption.Add label sanitization to
debounce_setup()....
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +8
-0+static inline char *make_irq_label (const char *orig) +{ +char *new; + +if (!orig) +return NULL ; + + new =kstrdup_and_replace (orig,'/' ,':' ,GFP_KERNEL );drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c static u32 line_event_id(int level) · line 748
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +10
-0+if (!new) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + +return new; +} + +static inline void free_irq_label (const char *label) +{ +kfree (label); +}First of all this could have been done in the previous patch already, but okay.
...
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c static int debounce_setup(struct line *line, unsigned int debounce_period_us) · line 1066
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +4
-0+ label =make_irq_label (line->req->label); +if (IS_ERR (label)) +return -ENOMEM ; + irqflags =IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING ; ret =request_irq (irq, debounce_irq_handler, irqflags, line->req->label, line);But the main point how does this change fix anything?
Shouldn't be
Review
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1- line->req->label, line); + label, line);
It should, I badly copy-pasted Kent's correct code. Thanks, I fixed it in tree.
Bart
Quoted 13 lines
?
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c static int debounce_setup(struct line *line, unsigned int debounce_period_us) · line 1070
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c +3
-0+if (ret) { +free_irq_label (label);return ret; + }--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 18 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This series fixes a couple of bugs in the sanitization of labels being passed to irq.
Patch 1 fixes the case where userspace provides empty labels.
Patch 2 fixes a missed path in the sanitization changes that can result in memory corruption.
v1 -> v2:
- switched the order of the patches in order to avoid introducing buggy code in one just to fix it in the secondBartosz Golaszewski (1):
gpio: cdev: check for NULL labels when sanitizing them for irqs
Quoted 9 lines
Kent Gibson (1):
gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing indebounce_setup()drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)--
2.40.1
I'll go ahead and apply it as the culprit already got upstream and into stable branches, so let's fix it ASAP. Tomorrow once autobuilders confirm it's fine, I'll send it to Linus.
Bart