selftests: timers: Fix posix_timers ksft_print_msg warning
Subsystems (4)
John Stultz
maintainerPATCH 1/3 selftests: timers: Fix posix_timers ksft_print_msg warning
After commit 6d029c25b71f ("selftests/timers/posix_timers:
Reimplement check_timer_distribution()") I started seeing the following warning building with an older gcc:
posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~Fix this up by changing it to ksft_print_msg("%s", errmsg)
--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int check_timer_distribution(void)ksft_test_result_skip ("check signal distribution (old kernel)\n" );return 0 ; err: -ksft_print_msg (errmsg); +ksft_print_msg ("%s" , errmsg);return -1 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
John Stultz
maintainerPATCH 2/3 selftests: timers: Fix uninitialized variable warning in ksft_min_kernel_version
Building with clang, I see the following warning:
In file included from posix_timers.c:17:./../kselftest.h:398:6: warning: variable 'major' is used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
./../kselftest.h:401:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor);
^~~~~This is a bit of a red-herring as if the uname() call did fail, we would hit ksft_exit_fail_msg() which should exit.
But to make clang happpy, lets initialize the major/minor values to zero.
--- tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h +1 -1
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_skip(const char *msg, ...)static inline int ksft_min_kernel_version (unsigned int min_major,unsigned int min_minor) { -unsigned int major, minor; +unsigned int major =0 , minor =0 ;struct utsname info;if (uname (&info) ||sscanf (info.release,"%u.%u." , &major, &minor) !=2 )
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: timers: Fix uninitialized variable warning in ksft_min_kernel_version
Quoted 4 lines · John Stultz
Building with clang, I see the following warning:
In file included from posix_timers.c:17:
./../kselftest.h:398:6: warning: variable 'major' is used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
Quoted 8 lines
if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ./../kselftest.h:401:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor); ^~~~~This is a bit of a red-herring as if the
uname()call did fail, we would hitksft_exit_fail_msg()which should exit.
Correct, although we have not really conveyed that to the compiler, right? exit() is noreturn, which means all functions that call exit() unconditionally are also noreturn, such as ksft_exit_fail_msg(). LLVM will figure this out once it performs inlining and such but that happens after clang's static analysis phase that this warning occurs in. I think a better solution would be to add __noreturn to the functions in tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h that call exit(), so that the compiler is aware of this through all pipeline phases, maybe something like this? It resolves the wawrning for me.
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h +8 -7
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@#define KSFT_XPASS 3#define KSFT_SKIP 4 +#define __noreturn __attribute__((__noreturn__))#define __printf (a, b) __attribute__((format(printf, a, b)))/* counters */
@@ -324,13 +325,13 @@ void ksft_test_result_code(int exit_code, const char *test_name,break ; \ } }while (0 ) -static inline int ksft_exit_pass(void) +static inline __noreturn int ksft_exit_pass(void) {ksft_print_cnts ();exit (KSFT_PASS ); } -static inline int ksft_exit_fail (void ) +static inline __noreturn int ksft_exit_fail (void ) {ksft_print_cnts ();exit (KSFT_FAIL );
@@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ static inline int ksft_exit_fail(void) ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail + \ ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip) -static inline __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_fail_msg(const char *msg, ...) +static inline __noreturn __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_fail_msg(const char *msg, ...) {int saved_errno = errno;va_list args;
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_fail_msg(const char *msg, ...)exit (KSFT_FAIL ); } -static inline void ksft_exit_fail_perror (const char *msg) +static inline __noreturn void ksft_exit_fail_perror (const char *msg) {#ifndef NOLIBC ksft_exit_fail_msg ("%s: %s (%d)\n" , msg,strerror (errno), errno);
@@ -385,19 +386,19 @@ static inline void ksft_exit_fail_perror(const char *msg)#endif } -static inline int ksft_exit_xfail (void ) +static inline __noreturn int ksft_exit_xfail (void ) {ksft_print_cnts ();exit (KSFT_XFAIL ); } -static inline int ksft_exit_xpass (void ) +static inline __noreturn int ksft_exit_xpass (void ) {ksft_print_cnts ();exit (KSFT_XPASS ); } -static inline __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_skip(const char *msg, ...) +static inline __noreturn __printf(1, 2) int ksft_exit_skip(const char *msg, ...) { int saved_errno = errno;va_list args;
John Stultz
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: timers: Fix uninitialized variable warning in ksft_min_kernel_version
Quoted 14 lines · Nathan Chancellor
Quoted 4 lines · John Stultz
Building with clang, I see the following warning:
In file included from posix_timers.c:17:
./../kselftest.h:398:6: warning: variable 'major' is used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]Quoted 8 lines
if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ./../kselftest.h:401:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor); ^~~~~This is a bit of a red-herring as if the
uname()call did fail, we would hitksft_exit_fail_msg()which should exit.
Quoted 9 lines
Correct, although we have not really conveyed that to the compiler, right?
exit()is noreturn, which means all functions that callexit()unconditionally are also noreturn, such asksft_exit_fail_msg(). LLVM will figure this out once it performs inlining and such but that happens after clang's static analysis phase that this warning occurs in. I think a better solution would be to add__noreturnto the functions intools/testing/selftests/kselftest.hthat callexit(), so that the compiler is aware of this through all pipeline phases, maybe something like this? It resolves the wawrning for me.
No objection from me if this is the better approach.
Would you send that patch out?
thanks
-john
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: timers: Fix uninitialized variable warning in ksft_min_kernel_version
Quoted 25 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 14 lines · Nathan Chancellor
Quoted 4 lines · John Stultz
Building with clang, I see the following warning:
In file included from posix_timers.c:17:
./../kselftest.h:398:6: warning: variable 'major' is used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]Quoted 8 lines
if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ./../kselftest.h:401:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor); ^~~~~This is a bit of a red-herring as if the
uname()call did fail, we would hitksft_exit_fail_msg()which should exit.Quoted 9 lines
Correct, although we have not really conveyed that to the compiler, right?
exit()is noreturn, which means all functions that callexit()unconditionally are also noreturn, such asksft_exit_fail_msg(). LLVM will figure this out once it performs inlining and such but that happens after clang's static analysis phase that this warning occurs in. I think a better solution would be to add__noreturnto the functions intools/testing/selftests/kselftest.hthat callexit(), so that the compiler is aware of this through all pipeline phases, maybe something like this? It resolves the wawrning for me.
Quoted 3 lines
No objection from me if this is the better approach.
Would you send that patch out?
Done: https://lore.kernel.org/20240411-mark-kselftest-exit-funcs-noreturn-v1-1-b027c948f586@kernel.org/
If you have to respin this series for some reason, feel free to include that change so that they go together, up to you though.
Cheers,
nathan
John Stultz
maintainerPATCH 3/3 selftests: timers: Fix abs() warning in posix_timers test
In reply to John StultzBuilding with clang, I'm seeing:
posix_timers.c:69:6: warning: absolute value function 'abs' given an argument of type 'long long' but has parameter of type 'int' which may cause truncation of value [-Wabsolute-value]
if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) {
^So switch to using llabs() instead.
--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1 -1
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int check_diff(struct timeval start, struct timeval end) diff = end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec; diff += (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) *USECS_PER_SEC ; -if (abs (diff -DELAY *USECS_PER_SEC ) >USECS_PER_SEC /2 ) { +if (llabs (diff -DELAY *USECS_PER_SEC ) >USECS_PER_SEC /2 ) {printf ("Diff too high: %lld.." , diff);return -1 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
[tip: timers/urgent] selftests: timers: Fix abs() warning in posix_timers test
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ed366de8ec89d4f960d66c85fc37d9de22f7bf6d Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ed366de8ec89d4f960d66c85fc37d9de22f7bf6d Author: John Stultz <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:26:30 -07:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:11:15 +02:00
selftests: timers: Fix abs() warning in posix_timers test
Building with clang results in the following warning:
posix_timers.c:69:6: warning: absolute value function 'abs' given an
argument of type 'long long' but has parameter of type 'int' which may cause truncation of value [-Wabsolute-value]
if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) {
^
So switch to using llabs() instead.
--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1 -1
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int check_diff(struct timeval start, struct timeval end) diff = end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec; diff += (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) *USECS_PER_SEC ; -if (abs (diff -DELAY *USECS_PER_SEC ) >USECS_PER_SEC /2 ) { +if (llabs (diff -DELAY *USECS_PER_SEC ) >USECS_PER_SEC /2 ) {printf ("Diff too high: %lld.." , diff);return -1 ; }
Quoted 20 lines · John Stultz
After commit
6d029c25b71f("selftests/timers/posix_timers:
Reimplementcheck_timer_distribution()") I started seeing the following warning building with an older gcc:posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~Fix this up by changing it to
ksft_print_msg("%s", errmsg)Cc Shuah Khan <[email protected]>Cc Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Cc Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>Cc Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>Cc Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>Cc Bill Wendling <[email protected]>Cc Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Cc Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>Cc Andrew Morton <[email protected]>Cc Edward Liaw <[email protected]>Cc Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>Fixes 6d029c25b71f ("selftests/timers/posix_timers: Reimplement check_timer_distribution()")Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>
Yep, makes sense.
Quoted 20 lines
--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1
-2@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int check_timer_distribution(void)ksft_test_result_skip ("check signal distribution (old kernel)\n" );return 0 ; err: -ksft_print_msg (errmsg); +ksft_print_msg ("%s" , errmsg);return -1 ; } --2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
Quoted 8 lines · John Stultz
After commit
6d029c25b71f("selftests/timers/posix_timers:
Reimplementcheck_timer_distribution()") I started seeing the following warning building with an older gcc:posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c static int check_timer_distribution(void) · line 251
Quoted 3 lines
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1
-1-ksft_print_msg (errmsg); +ksft_print_msg ("%s" , errmsg);return -1 ;
Thanks,
Oleg.
Shuah Khan
maintainerQuoted 1 line · John Stultz
After commit
6d029c25b71f("selftests/timers/posix_timers:
Tried to apply this for linux-kselftest next with Nathan's patch. I can't find this commit in Linux 6.9-rc3? Is this is timers tree?
Quoted 35 lines
Reimplement
check_timer_distribution()") I started seeing the following warning building with an older gcc:posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~Fix this up by changing it to
ksft_print_msg("%s", errmsg)Cc Shuah Khan <[email protected]>Cc Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Cc Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>Cc Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>Cc Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>Cc Bill Wendling <[email protected]>Cc Justin Stitt <[email protected]>Cc Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>Cc Andrew Morton <[email protected]>Cc Edward Liaw <[email protected]>Cc Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>Fixes 6d029c25b71f ("selftests/timers/posix_timers: Reimplement check_timer_distribution()")Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +0
-0
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c static int check_timer_distribution(void) · line 253
Quoted 8 lines
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1
-1@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int check_timer_distribution(void)ksft_test_result_skip ("check signal distribution (old kernel)\n" );return 0 ; err: -ksft_print_msg (errmsg); +ksft_print_msg ("%s" , errmsg);return -1 ; }
thanks,
-- Shuah
John Stultz
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Shuah Khan
Quoted 1 line · John Stultz
After commit
6d029c25b71f("selftests/timers/posix_timers:Tried to apply this for linux-kselftest next with Nathan's patch. I can't find this commit in Linux 6.9-rc3? Is this is timers tree?
Yes, it in tip/timers/urgent.
thanks
-john
Quoted 11 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 7 lines · Shuah Khan
Quoted 1 line · John Stultz
After commit
6d029c25b71f("selftests/timers/posix_timers:Tried to apply this for linux-kselftest next with Nathan's patch. I can't find this commit in Linux 6.9-rc3? Is this is timers tree?
Yes, it in tip/timers/urgent.
Thank you. Assuming this is going through tip/timers/urgent
thanks,
-- Shuah
[tip: timers/urgent] selftests: timers: Fix posix_timers ksft_print_msg() warning
In reply to John StultzThe following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: e4a6bceac98eba3c00e874892736b34ea5fdaca3 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e4a6bceac98eba3c00e874892736b34ea5fdaca3 Author: John Stultz <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:26:28 -07:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:11:15 +02:00
selftests: timers: Fix posix_timers ksft_print_msg() warning
After commit 6d029c25b71f ("selftests/timers/posix_timers: Reimplement check_timer_distribution()") the following warning occurs when building with an older gcc:
posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~Fix this up by changing it to ksft_print_msg("%s", errmsg)
--- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +1 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int check_timer_distribution(void)ksft_test_result_skip ("check signal distribution (old kernel)\n" );return 0 ; err: -ksft_print_msg (errmsg); +ksft_print_msg ("%s" , errmsg);return -1 ; }