staging: vt6656: Fix checkpatch unnecessary parentheses
PATCH 1/1 staging: vt6656: Fix checkpatch unnecessary parentheses
Remove unnecessary parentheses - according to checkpatch.pl strict
Signed-off-by Teddy Engel <[email protected]>
--- drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO | 2 +- drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c | 8 ++++---- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO +1 -1
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ TODO: - switch to use LIB80211 - switch to use MAC80211 - use kernel coding style -- checkpatch.pl fixes +- checkpatch.pl fixes -- done - sparse fixes - integrate with drivers/net/wireless
drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c +4 -4
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ int vnt_vt3184_init(struct vnt_private *priv)dev_dbg (&priv->usb->dev,"RF Type %d\n" , priv->rf_type); -if ((priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230 ) || - (priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230S )) { +if (priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230 || + priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230S ) { priv->bb_rx_conf = vnt_vt3184_al2230[10 ]; length =sizeof (vnt_vt3184_al2230); addr = vnt_vt3184_al2230;
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ int vnt_vt3184_init(struct vnt_private *priv)if (ret) goto end; -if ((priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226 ) || - (priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226D0 )) { +if (priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226 || + priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226D0 ) { data = (priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226D0 ) ?0x11 :0x23 ; ret = vnt_control_out_u8(priv, MESSAGE_REQUEST_MACREG,
drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c +2 -2
@@ -339,8 +339,8 @@ static int vnt_init_registers(struct vnt_private *priv)/* load vt3266 calibration parameters in EEPROM */ if (priv->rf_type ==RF_VT3226D0 ) { -if ((priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_MAJOR_VER ] ==0x1 ) && - (priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_MINOR_VER ] >=0x4 )) { +if (priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_MAJOR_VER ] ==0x1 && + priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_MINOR_VER ] >=0x4 ) { calib_tx_iq = priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_CALIB_TX_IQ ]; calib_tx_dc = priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_CALIB_TX_DC ]; calib_rx_iq = priv->eeprom[EEP_OFS_CALIB_RX_IQ ];
drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c +4 -4
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int vnt_rx_data(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rcb *ptr_rcb,return false; } -if ((bytes_received >2372 ) || (bytes_received <=40 )) { +if (bytes_received >2372 || bytes_received <=40 ) {/* Frame Size error drop this packet.*/ dev_dbg (&priv->usb->dev,"------ WRONG Length 2\n" );return false;
@@ -299,9 +299,9 @@ static int vnt_rx_data(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rcb *ptr_rcb,/* if SQ3 the range is 24~27, if no SQ3 the range is 20~23 */ /*Fix hardware bug => PLCP_Length error */ -if (((bytes_received - head->pay_load_len) >27 ) || - ((bytes_received - head->pay_load_len) <24 ) || - (bytes_received < head->pay_load_len)) { +if ((bytes_received - head->pay_load_len) >27 || + (bytes_received - head->pay_load_len) <24 || + bytes_received < head->pay_load_len) {dev_dbg (&priv->usb->dev,"Wrong PLCP Length %x\n" , head->pay_load_len);return false;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 15 lines · Teddy Engel
Remove unnecessary parentheses - according to checkpatch.pl strict
Signed-off-by Teddy Engel <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO | 2 +- drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c | 8 ++++---- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO +0
-0
drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO TODO: · line 14
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO +1
-1@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ TODO: - switch to use LIB80211 - switch to use MAC80211 - use kernel coding style -- checkpatch.pl fixes +- checkpatch.pl fixes -- done
When fixing something, you can just remove the line.
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/staging/vt6656/TODO +0
-0- sparse fixes - integrate with drivers/net/wirelessdrivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c +0
-0
drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c int vnt_vt3184_init(struct vnt_private *priv) · line 234
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c +2
-2@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ int vnt_vt3184_init(struct vnt_private *priv)dev_dbg (&priv->usb->dev,"RF Type %d\n" , priv->rf_type); -if ((priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230 ) || - (priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230S )) { +if (priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230 || + priv->rf_type ==RF_AL2230S ) {
Sorry, but no, please see the mailing list archives as to why I keep rejecting these kinds of patches. checkpatch is wrong here.
greg k-h