Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error" failed to apply to 6.9-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 3 participants 4 messages Jul 1, 2024 – Jul 2, 2024

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.9.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024070105-falsify-surrender-babc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.9.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

5d92c7c566dc ("ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:42:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error

If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called.

However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0
RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68
R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006
FS:  00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0
 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
 release_nodes+0x35/0xb0
 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140
 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata]
 ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata]
 ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]

Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally.

drivers/ata/libata-core.c +3 -0
index efb5195da60c..bdccf4ea251a 100644
@@ -5517,6 +5517,9 @@ static void ata_host_release(struct kref *kref)
 	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
 		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
 
+		if (!ap)
+			continue;
+
 		kfree(ap->pmp_link);
 		kfree(ap->slave_link);
 		kfree(ap->ncq_sense_buf);
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · On 7/1/24 23:31, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.9.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024070105-falsify-surrender-babc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.9.y' HEAD^..

Quoted 3 lines

Possible dependencies:

5d92c7c566dc ("ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error")

Greg,

I am confused... This patch applies cleanly to linux-6.9.y. The procedure above also works just fine. And the "Possible dependencies" on itself does not make sense. Bot problem ?

Quoted 74 lines

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:42:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error

If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called.

However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0
RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68
R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006
FS:  00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0
 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]
 release_nodes+0x35/0xb0
 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140
 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata]
 ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata]
 ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]

Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally.

drivers/ata/libata-core.c +3 -0
index efb5195da60c..bdccf4ea251a 100644
@@ -5517,6 +5517,9 @@ static void ata_host_release(struct kref *kref)
 	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
 		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
 
+		if (!ap)
+			continue;
+
 		kfree(ap->pmp_link);
 		kfree(ap->slave_link);
 		kfree(ap->ncq_sense_buf);
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 18 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 17 lines · On 7/1/24 23:31, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.9.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024070105-falsify-surrender-babc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.9.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

5d92c7c566dc ("ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error")

Greg,

I am confused... This patch applies cleanly to linux-6.9.y. The procedure above also works just fine. And the "Possible dependencies" on itself does not make sense. Bot problem ?

Odd, this seems to already be in the tree, sorry for the noise.

greg k-h

maintainer
#3 lore raw
Quoted 21 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 20 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 18 lines · On 7/1/24 23:31, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.9.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5d92c7c566dc76d96e0e19e481d926bbe6631c1e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024070105-falsify-surrender-babc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.9.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

5d92c7c566dc ("ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error")

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Greg,

I am confused... This patch applies cleanly to linux-6.9.y. The procedure above also works just fine. And the "Possible dependencies" on itself does not make sense. Bot problem ?

Odd, this seems to already be in the tree, sorry for the noise.

Sorry, I didn't expect something like this would happen, but it went in as a dependency for a different patch.

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Sasha