dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,atna45dc02: Document ATNA45DC02
Subsystems (6)
PATCH 1/3 dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,atna45dc02: Document ATNA45DC02
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
The Samsung ATNA45DC02 panel is an AMOLED eDP panel, similar to the existing ATNA45AF01 and ATNA33XC20 panel but with a higher resolution.
--- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml +2 -0
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ properties: - samsung,atna33xc20 # Samsung 14.5" WQXGA+ (2880x1800 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel - samsung,atna45af01 + # Samsung 14.5" 3K (2944x1840 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel + - samsung,atna45dc02 enable-gpios: true port: true
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
PATCH 2/3 drm/panel: samsung,atna33xc20: Add compatible for ATNA45DC02
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
The Samsung ATNA45DC02 panel needs the same power sequencing as the ATNA45AF01 and ATNA33XC20.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-atna33xc20.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-atna33xc20.c +1 -0
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static void atana33xc20_remove(struct dp_aux_ep_device *aux_ep)static const struct of_device_id atana33xc20_dt_match[] = { { .compatible ="samsung,atna33xc20" , }, { .compatible ="samsung,atna45af01" , }, + { .compatible ="samsung,atna45dc02" , }, {/* sentinal */ } };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, atana33xc20_dt_match);
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/panel: samsung,atna33xc20: Add compatible for ATNA45DC02
Hi,
Quoted 10 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
The Samsung ATNA45DC02 panel needs the same power sequencing as the ATNA45AF01 and ATNA33XC20.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-atna33xc20.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
I believe this patch should be dropped and, until there is special logic needed for "samsung,atna45dc02" we can just rely on the fallback compatible ("samsung,atna33xc20") matching.
-Doug
PATCH 3/3 arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-yoga: Update panel bindings
In reply to Rob ClarkFrom: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Use the correct panel compatible, and wire up enable-gpio. It is wired up in the same way as the x1e80100-crd.
--- .../boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts +12 -1
@@ -592,9 +592,13 @@ &mdss_dp3 { aux-bus { panel { - compatible = "edp-panel"; + compatible = "samsung,atna45dc02"; + enable-gpios = <&pmc8380_3_gpios 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; power-supply = <&vreg_edp_3p3>; + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_en>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + port { edp_panel_in: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp3_out>;
@@ -663,6 +667,13 @@ &pcie6a_phy { status = "okay"; }; +&pmc8380_3_gpios { + edp_bl_en: edp-bl-en-state { + pins = "gpio4"; + function = "normal"; + }; +}; + &qupv3_0 { status = "okay"; };
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-yoga: Update panel bindings
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Use the correct panel compatible, and wire up enable-gpio. It is wired up in the same way as the x1e80100-crd.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>---
Konrad
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-yoga: Update panel bindings
In reply to Rob ClarkHi,
Quoted 16 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Use the correct panel compatible, and wire up enable-gpio. It is wired up in the same way as the x1e80100-crd.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>--- .../boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts +0
-0
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts &mdss_dp3 { · line 595
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts +1
-1@@ -592,9 +592,13 @@ &mdss_dp3 { aux-bus { panel { - compatible = "edp-panel"; + compatible = "samsung,atna45dc02";
Instead of the above, I believe you should use:
compatible = "samsung,atna45dc02", "samsung,atna33xc20";
...which makes the dts work without any code changes. This is what we decided upon for Stephen's panel [0]
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
-Doug
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-yoga: Update panel bindings
Quoted 28 lines · Doug Anderson
Hi,
Quoted 16 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Use the correct panel compatible, and wire up enable-gpio. It is wired up in the same way as the x1e80100-crd.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>--- .../boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts +0
-0arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts &mdss_dp3 { · line 595
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts +1
-1@@ -592,9 +592,13 @@ &mdss_dp3 { aux-bus { panel { - compatible = "edp-panel"; + compatible = "samsung,atna45dc02";Instead of the above, I believe you should use:
Quoted 4 lines
compatible = "samsung,atna45dc02", "samsung,atna33xc20";
...which makes the dts work without any code changes. This is what we decided upon for Stephen's panel [0]
sure, that sounds reasonable.. I only saw the first version because that is what is in the x1e80100-next branch atm
BR,
-R
Quoted 4 lines
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
-Doug
Quoted 15 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
The Samsung ATNA45DC02 panel is an AMOLED eDP panel, similar to the existing ATNA45AF01 and ATNA33XC20 panel but with a higher resolution.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>--- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml +0
-0
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml properties: · line 23
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml +2
-0@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ properties: - samsung,atna33xc20 # Samsung 14.5" WQXGA+ (2880x1800 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel - samsung,atna45af01 + # Samsung 14.5" 3K (2944x1840 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel + - samsung,atna45dc02
This makes me wonder if we should define a cover compatible like samsung,amoled-edp-panel.
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml +0
-0enable-gpios: true port: trueSignature · 1 line
2.45.2
Signature · 2 lines
With best wishes Dmitry
Hi,
Quoted 12 lines · Dmitry Baryshkov
Quoted 10 lines · Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
The Samsung ATNA45DC02 panel is an AMOLED eDP panel, similar to the existing ATNA45AF01 and ATNA33XC20 panel but with a higher resolution.
Signed-off-by Rob Clark <[email protected]>--- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml properties: · line 23
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/samsung,atna33xc20.yaml +2
-0@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ properties: - samsung,atna33xc20 # Samsung 14.5" WQXGA+ (2880x1800 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel - samsung,atna45af01 + # Samsung 14.5" 3K (2944x1840 pixels) eDP AMOLED panel + - samsung,atna45dc02
Please follow what we decided in Stephan Gerhold's case and use a fallback compatible. In other words: your patch seems to be based on his v1 and not his v2.
Quoted 2 lines
This makes me wonder if we should define a cover compatible like samsung,amoled-edp-panel.
I will bow to the wisdom of the DT folks, but my understanding is that we shouldn't do that. The fallback compatible can just be the compatible of the first panel that we supported that used the same interface.
-Doug