Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Aug 7, 2024

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 8cd44dd1d17a23d5cc8c443c659ca57aa76e2fa5
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024080751-importer-postbox-eb90@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

8cd44dd1d17a ("btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block group read-write again") 9d4b0a129a0d ("btrfs: simplify arguments of btrfs_update_space_info and rename") 6a921de58992 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes") f6fca3917b4d ("btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct")
b8bea09a456f ("btrfs: add trace event for submitted RAID56 bio")
c67c68eb57f1 ("btrfs: use integrated bitmaps for btrfs_raid_bio::dbitmap and finish_pbitmap") 143823cf4d5a ("btrfs: fix typos in comments")
385de0ef387d ("btrfs: use a normal workqueue for rmw_workers")
a7b8e39c922b ("btrfs: raid56: enable subpage support for RAID56")
3907ce293d68 ("btrfs: raid56: make alloc_rbio_essential_pages() subpage compatible") ac26df8b3b02 ("btrfs: raid56: remove btrfs_raid_bio::bio_pages array") 07e4d3808047 ("btrfs: raid56: make __raid_recover_endio_io() subpage compatible") 46900662d02f ("btrfs: raid56: make finish_parity_scrub() subpage compatible") 3e77605d6a81 ("btrfs: raid56: make rbio_add_io_page() subpage compatible") 00425dd976d3 ("btrfs: raid56: introduce btrfs_raid_bio::bio_sectors")
eb3570607c8c ("btrfs: raid56: introduce btrfs_raid_bio::stripe_sectors") 94efbe19b9f1 ("btrfs: raid56: introduce new cached members for btrfs_raid_bio") 29b068382c6f ("btrfs: raid56: make btrfs_raid_bio more compact")
843de58b3e31 ("btrfs: raid56: open code rbio_nr_pages()")
cc353a8be2fd ("btrfs: reduce width for stripe_len from u64 to u32")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 8cd44dd1d17a23d5cc8c443c659ca57aa76e2fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:18:02 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block
group read-write again

When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all free regions in the block group to space_info->bytes_readonly. That free space excludes reserved and pinned regions. OTOH, when btrfs makes the block group read-write again, it moves all the unused regions into the block group's zone_unusable. That unused region includes reserved and pinned regions. As a result, it counts too much zone_unusable bytes.

Fortunately (or unfortunately), having erroneous zone_unusable does not affect the calculation of space_info->bytes_readonly, because free space (num_bytes in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro) calculation is done based on the erroneous zone_unusable and it reduces the num_bytes just to cancel the error.

This behavior can be easily discovered by adding a WARN_ON to check e.g, "bg->pinned > 0" in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(), and running fstests test case like btrfs/282.

Fix it by properly considering pinned and reserved in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(). Also, add a WARN_ON and introduce btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable() to catch a similar mistake.

Fixes 169e0da91a21 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones")
fs/btrfs/block-group.c +8 -5
index 498442d0c216..2e49d978f504 100644
@@ -1223,8 +1223,8 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	block_group->space_info->total_bytes -= block_group->length;
 	block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly -=
 		(block_group->length - block_group->zone_unusable);
-	block_group->space_info->bytes_zone_unusable -=
-		block_group->zone_unusable;
+	btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable(fs_info, block_group->space_info,
+						    -block_group->zone_unusable);
 	block_group->space_info->disk_total -= block_group->length * factor;
 
 	spin_unlock(&block_group->space_info->lock);
@@ -1396,7 +1396,8 @@ static int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, int force)
 		if (btrfs_is_zoned(cache->fs_info)) {
 			/* Migrate zone_unusable bytes to readonly */
 			sinfo->bytes_readonly += cache->zone_unusable;
-			sinfo->bytes_zone_unusable -= cache->zone_unusable;
+			btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable(cache->fs_info, sinfo,
+								    -cache->zone_unusable);
 			cache->zone_unusable = 0;
 		}
 		cache->ro++;
@@ -3056,9 +3057,11 @@ void btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
 		if (btrfs_is_zoned(cache->fs_info)) {
 			/* Migrate zone_unusable bytes back */
 			cache->zone_unusable =
-				(cache->alloc_offset - cache->used) +
+				(cache->alloc_offset - cache->used - cache->pinned -
+				 cache->reserved) +
 				(cache->length - cache->zone_capacity);
-			sinfo->bytes_zone_unusable += cache->zone_unusable;
+			btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable(cache->fs_info, sinfo,
+								    cache->zone_unusable);
 			sinfo->bytes_readonly -= cache->zone_unusable;
 		}
 		num_bytes = cache->length - cache->reserved -
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +2 -1
index d77498e7671c..ff9f0d41987e 100644
@@ -2793,7 +2793,8 @@ static int unpin_extent_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 			readonly = true;
 		} else if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info)) {
 			/* Need reset before reusing in a zoned block group */
-			space_info->bytes_zone_unusable += len;
+			btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable(fs_info, space_info,
+								    len);
 			readonly = true;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c +3 -1
index 3f9b7507543a..f5996a43db24 100644
@@ -2723,8 +2723,10 @@ static int __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
 	 * If the block group is read-only, we should account freed space into
 	 * bytes_readonly.
 	 */
-	if (!block_group->ro)
+	if (!block_group->ro) {
 		block_group->zone_unusable += to_unusable;
+		WARN_ON(block_group->zone_unusable > block_group->length);
+	}
 	spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
 	if (!used) {
 		spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
fs/btrfs/space-info.c +1 -1
index c1d9d3664400..68e14fd48638 100644
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ void btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
 	found->bytes_used += block_group->used;
 	found->disk_used += block_group->used * factor;
 	found->bytes_readonly += block_group->bytes_super;
-	found->bytes_zone_unusable += block_group->zone_unusable;
+	btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable(info, found, block_group->zone_unusable);
 	if (block_group->length > 0)
 		found->full = 0;
 	btrfs_try_granting_tickets(info, found);
fs/btrfs/space-info.h +1 -0
index 4db8a0267c16..88b44221ce97 100644
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ btrfs_space_info_update_##name(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,		\
 
 DECLARE_SPACE_INFO_UPDATE(bytes_may_use, "space_info");
 DECLARE_SPACE_INFO_UPDATE(bytes_pinned, "pinned");
+DECLARE_SPACE_INFO_UPDATE(bytes_zone_unusable, "zone_unusable");
 
 int btrfs_init_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 void btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
include/trace/events/btrfs.h +8 -0
index eeb56975bee7..de55a555d95b 100644
@@ -2383,6 +2383,14 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(btrfs__space_info_update, update_bytes_pinned,
 	TP_ARGS(fs_info, sinfo, old, diff)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(btrfs__space_info_update, update_bytes_zone_unusable,
+
+	TP_PROTO(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+		 const struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo, u64 old, s64 diff),
+
+	TP_ARGS(fs_info, sinfo, old, diff)
+);
+
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs_raid56_bio,
 
 	TP_PROTO(const struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,