FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: reuse ID 0 after delete and re-add" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 8b8ed1b429f8fa7ebd5632555e7b047bc0620075
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024083041-irate-headless-590c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8b8ed1b429f8fa7ebd5632555e7b047bc0620075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:14:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: reuse ID 0 after delete and re-add
When the endpoint used by the initial subflow is removed and re-added later, the PM has to force the ID 0, it is a special case imposed by the MPTCP specs.
Note that the endpoint should then need to be re-added reusing the same ID.
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +10 -0
@@ -585,6 +585,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)__clear_bit (local.addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); msk->pm.add_addr_signaled++; + +/* Special case for ID0: set the correct ID */ +if (local.addr.id == msk->mpc_endpoint_id) + local.addr.id =0 ; +mptcp_pm_announce_addr (msk, &local.addr, false);mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack (msk);
@@ -609,6 +614,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk) msk->pm.local_addr_used++;__clear_bit (local.addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); + +/* Special case for ID0: set the correct ID */ +if (local.addr.id == msk->mpc_endpoint_id) + local.addr.id =0 ; + nr =fill_remote_addresses_vec (msk, &local.addr, fullmesh, addrs);if (nr ==0 )continue ;
Matthieu Baerts
maintainerHi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On 30/08/2024 12:21, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
v6.12? Are you back from the future? :)
Cheers,
Matt
Signature · 1 line
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Matthieu Baerts
Hi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On 30/08/2024 12:21, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
v6.12? Are you back from the future? :)
Hah, you noticed this, sorry. Slip of the finger :)