Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xhci: Don't perform Soft Retry for Etron xHCI host

PATCH Superseded Kuangyi Chiang 3 participants 13 messages Sep 11, 2024 – Sep 16, 2024

Subsystems (3)

v1 of 4 Superseded Latest is v4 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 xhci: Don't perform Soft Retry for Etron xHCI host

Since commit f8f80be501aa ("xhci: Use soft retry to recover faster from transaction errors"), unplugging USB device while enumeration results in errors like this:

[ 364.855321] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: ERROR Transfer event for disabled endpoint slot 5 ep 2
[ 364.864622] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: @0000002167656d70 67f03000 00000021 0c000000 05038001
[ 374.934793] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: Abort failed to stop command ring: -110
[ 374.958793] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead
[ 374.967590] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: HC died; cleaning up
[ 374.973984] xhci_hcd 0000:0b:00.0: Timeout while waiting for configure endpoint command

Seems that Etorn xHCI host can not perform Soft Retry correctly, apply XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY quirk to disable Soft Retry and then issue is gone.

This patch depends on commit a4a251f8c235 ("usb: xhci: do not perform Soft Retry for some xHCI hosts").

Fixes f8f80be501aa ("xhci: Use soft retry to recover faster from transaction errors")
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c +2 -0
index dda873f3fee7..19f120ed8dd3 100644
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY;
 	}
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON &&
 			pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ188) {
@@ -406,6 +407,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY;
 	}
 
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS &&
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 xhci: Don't issue Reset Device command to Etron xHCI host

Sometimes the hub driver does not recognize the USB device connected to the external USB2.0 hub when the system resumes from S4.

After the SetPortFeature(PORT_RESET) request is completed, the hub driver calls the HCD reset_device callback, which will issue a Reset Device command and free all structures associated with endpoints that were disabled.

This happens when the xHCI driver issue a Reset Device command to inform the Etron xHCI host that the USB device associated with a device slot has been reset. Seems that the Etron xHCI host can not perform this command correctly, affecting the USB device.

To work around this, the xHCI driver should obtain a new device slot with reference to commit 651aaf36a7d7 ("usb: xhci: Handle USB transaction error on address command"), which is another way to inform the Etron xHCI host that the USB device has been reset.

Add a new quirk flag XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE to invoke the workaround in xhci_discover_or_reset_device().

Both EJ168 and EJ188 have the same problem, applying this patch then the problem is gone.

Fixes 2a8f82c4ceaf ("USB: xhci: Notify the xHC when a device is reset.")
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c |  2 ++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.c     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.h     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c +2 -0
index dc1e345ab67e..2fa7f32c2bf9 100644
@@ -397,11 +397,13 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 			pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ168) {
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
 	}
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON &&
 			pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ188) {
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
 	}
 
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS &&
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c +19 -0
index efdf4c228b8c..d890a97e0682 100644
@@ -3692,6 +3692,8 @@ void xhci_free_device_endpoint_resources(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
 				xhci->num_active_eps);
 }
 
+static void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev);
+
 /*
  * This submits a Reset Device Command, which will set the device state to 0,
  * set the device address to 0, and disable all the endpoints except the default
@@ -3762,6 +3764,23 @@ static int xhci_discover_or_reset_device(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
 						SLOT_STATE_DISABLED)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE) {
+		/*
+		 * Obtaining a new device slot to inform the xHCI host that
+		 * the USB device has been reset.
+		 */
+		ret = xhci_disable_slot(xhci, udev->slot_id);
+		xhci_free_virt_device(xhci, udev->slot_id);
+		if (!ret) {
+			ret = xhci_alloc_dev(hcd, udev);
+			if (ret == 1)
+				ret = 0;
+			else
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	trace_xhci_discover_or_reset_device(slot_ctx);
 
 	xhci_dbg(xhci, "Resetting device with slot ID %u\n", slot_id);
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h +1 -0
index ebd0afd59a60..1272d725270a 100644
@@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
 #define XHCI_ZHAOXIN_TRB_FETCH	BIT_ULL(45)
 #define XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST	BIT_ULL(46)
 #define XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO	BIT_ULL(47)
+#define XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE	BIT_ULL(48)
 
 	unsigned int		num_active_eps;
 	unsigned int		limit_active_eps;
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

In reply to Kuangyi Chiang

Performing a stability stress test on a USB3.0 2.5G ethernet adapter results in errors like this:

[   91.441469] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.458659] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.475911] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.493203] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.510421] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71

The r8152 driver will periodically issue lots of control-IN requests to access the status of ethernet adapter hardware registers during the test.

This happens when the xHCI driver enqueue a control TD (which cross over the Link TRB between two ring segments, as shown) in the endpoint zero's transfer ring. Seems the Etron xHCI host can not perform this TD correctly, causing the USB transfer error occurred, maybe the upper driver retry that control-IN request can solve problem, but not all drivers do this.

| |
-------
| TRB | Setup Stage
-------
| TRB | Link
-------
-------
| TRB | Data Stage
-------
| TRB | Status Stage
-------
| |

To work around this, the xHCI driver should enqueue a No Op TRB if next available TRB is the Link TRB in the ring segment, this can prevent the Setup and Data Stage TRB to be breaked by the Link TRB.

Add a new quirk flag XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD to invoke the workaround in xhci_queue_ctrl_tx().

Both EJ168 and EJ188 have the same problem, applying this patch then the problem is gone.

Fixes d0e96f5a71a0 ("USB: xhci: Control transfer support.")
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c  |  2 ++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.h      |  1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c +2 -0
index 2fa7f32c2bf9..dda873f3fee7 100644
@@ -398,12 +398,14 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD;
 	}
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON &&
 			pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ188) {
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD;
 	}
 
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS &&
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c +13 -0
index 4ea2c3e072a9..1c387d4dc152 100644
@@ -3727,6 +3727,19 @@ int xhci_queue_ctrl_tx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
 	if (!urb->setup_packet)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD) {
+		/*
+		 * If next available TRB is the Link TRB in the ring segment then
+		 * enqueue a No Op TRB, this can prevent the Setup and Data Stage
+		 * TRB to be breaked by the Link TRB.
+		 */
+		if (trb_is_link(ep_ring->enqueue + 1)) {
+			field = TRB_TYPE(TRB_TR_NOOP) | ep_ring->cycle_state;
+			queue_trb(xhci, ep_ring, false, 0, 0,
+					TRB_INTR_TARGET(0), field);
+		}
+	}
+
 	/* 1 TRB for setup, 1 for status */
 	num_trbs = 2;
 	/*
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h +1 -0
index 1272d725270a..aedbe8fee8be 100644
@@ -1629,6 +1629,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
 #define XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST	BIT_ULL(46)
 #define XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO	BIT_ULL(47)
 #define XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE	BIT_ULL(48)
+#define XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD	BIT_ULL(49)
 
 	unsigned int		num_active_eps;
 	unsigned int		limit_active_eps;
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

Hi,

Quoted 7 lines

This happens when the xHCI driver enqueue a control TD (which cross over the Link TRB between two ring segments, as shown) in the endpoint zero's transfer ring. Seems the Etron xHCI host can not perform this TD correctly, causing the USB transfer error occurred, maybe the upper driver retry that control-IN request can solve problem, but not all drivers do this.

Quoted 12 lines

| |
-------
| TRB | Setup Stage
-------
| TRB | Link
-------
-------
| TRB | Data Stage
-------
| TRB | Status Stage
-------
| |

I wonder about a few things.

1. What are the exact symptoms, besides Ethernet driver errors? Any errors from xhci_hcd? What if dynamic debug is enabled?

2. How did you determine that this is the exact cause?

3. Does it happen every time when a Link follows Setup, or only randomly and it takes lots of control transfers to trigger it?

4. How is it even possible? As far as I see, Linux simply queues three TRBs for a control URB. There are 255 slots in a segemnt, so exactly 85 URBs should fit, and then back to the first slot.

Regards,
Michal

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

Quoted 3 lines

4. How is it even possible? As far as I see, Linux simply queues three TRBs for a control URB. There are 255 slots in a segemnt, so exactly 85 URBs should fit, and then back to the first slot.

Not all control transfers have a Data stage TRB.

-Mathias

#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

In reply to Michał Pecio

Hi,

Thank you for the review.

Michał Pecio <[email protected]> 於 2024年9月11日 週三 下午3:52寫道:

Quoted 23 lines

Hi,

Quoted 7 lines

This happens when the xHCI driver enqueue a control TD (which cross over the Link TRB between two ring segments, as shown) in the endpoint zero's transfer ring. Seems the Etron xHCI host can not perform this TD correctly, causing the USB transfer error occurred, maybe the upper driver retry that control-IN request can solve problem, but not all drivers do this.

Quoted 12 lines

| |
-------
| TRB | Setup Stage
-------
| TRB | Link
-------
-------
| TRB | Data Stage
-------
| TRB | Status Stage
-------
| |

Quoted 4 lines

I wonder about a few things.

1. What are the exact symptoms, besides Ethernet driver errors? Any errors from xhci_hcd? What if dynamic debug is enabled?

The xhci driver receives a transfer event TRB (completion code is "USB Transaction Error") when the issue is triggered.

Quoted 2 lines

2. How did you determine that this is the exact cause?

The issue is triggered every time when a Link TRB follows a Setup Stage TRB.

Quoted 3 lines

3. Does it happen every time when a Link follows Setup, or only randomly and it takes lots of control transfers to trigger it?

Yes, it happens every time.

Quoted 4 lines

4. How is it even possible? As far as I see, Linux simply queues three TRBs for a control URB. There are 255 slots in a segemnt, so exactly 85 URBs should fit, and then back to the first slot.

The xhci driver also queues no data control transfers.

Quoted 3 lines

Regards,
Michal

Thanks,
Kuangyi Chiang

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

In reply to Kuangyi Chiang
Quoted 20 lines · Kuangyi Chiang

Performing a stability stress test on a USB3.0 2.5G ethernet adapter results in errors like this:

[   91.441469] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.458659] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.475911] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.493203] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.510421] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71

The r8152 driver will periodically issue lots of control-IN requests to access the status of ethernet adapter hardware registers during the test.

This happens when the xHCI driver enqueue a control TD (which cross over the Link TRB between two ring segments, as shown) in the endpoint zero's transfer ring. Seems the Etron xHCI host can not perform this TD correctly, causing the USB transfer error occurred, maybe the upper driver retry that control-IN request can solve problem, but not all drivers do this.

Quoted 13 lines

| |
-------
| TRB | Setup Stage
-------
| TRB | Link
-------
-------
| TRB | Data Stage
-------
| TRB | Status Stage
-------
| |

What if the link TRB is between Data and Status stage, does that case work normally?

Quoted 3 lines

To work around this, the xHCI driver should enqueue a No Op TRB if next available TRB is the Link TRB in the ring segment, this can prevent the Setup and Data Stage TRB to be breaked by the Link TRB.

There are some hosts that need the 'Chain' bit set in the Link TRB, does that work in this case?

Thanks
Mathias

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

Hi,

Thank you for the review.

Mathias Nyman <[email protected]> 於 2024年9月11日 週三 下午11:05寫道:

Quoted 36 lines · Kuangyi Chiang
Quoted 20 lines

Performing a stability stress test on a USB3.0 2.5G ethernet adapter results in errors like this:

[   91.441469] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.458659] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.475911] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.493203] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71
[   91.510421] r8152 2-3:1.0 eth3: get_registers -71

The r8152 driver will periodically issue lots of control-IN requests to access the status of ethernet adapter hardware registers during the test.

This happens when the xHCI driver enqueue a control TD (which cross over the Link TRB between two ring segments, as shown) in the endpoint zero's transfer ring. Seems the Etron xHCI host can not perform this TD correctly, causing the USB transfer error occurred, maybe the upper driver retry that control-IN request can solve problem, but not all drivers do this.

Quoted 13 lines

| |
-------
| TRB | Setup Stage
-------
| TRB | Link
-------
-------
| TRB | Data Stage
-------
| TRB | Status Stage
-------
| |

Quoted 2 lines

What if the link TRB is between Data and Status stage, does that case work normally?

I am not sure, I don't encounter this case, maybe OK.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

To work around this, the xHCI driver should enqueue a No Op TRB if next available TRB is the Link TRB in the ring segment, this can prevent the Setup and Data Stage TRB to be breaked by the Link TRB.

There are some hosts that need the 'Chain' bit set in the Link TRB, does that work in this case?

No, it doesn't work. It seems to be a hardware issue.

Quoted 4 lines

Thanks
Mathias

Thanks,
Kuangyi Chiang

#8 lore raw

cover xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host

In reply to Kuangyi Chiang

Add two new quirks XHCI_NO_RESET_DEVICE/XHCI_NO_BREAK_CTRL_TD to invoke the workaround:
xhci: Don't issue Reset Device command to Etron xHCI host
xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host

Apply quirk XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY to disable Soft Retry:
xhci: Don't perform Soft Retry for Etron xHCI host

Kuangyi Chiang (3):
xhci: Don't issue Reset Device command to Etron xHCI host
xhci: Fix control transfer error on Etron xHCI host
xhci: Don't perform Soft Retry for Etron xHCI host

 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c  |  6 ++++++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.c      | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.h      |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 0/3] xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host

Hi,

I have some Etron controller (forgot which one) but I'm not using it because it crashes ("dies") all the time under my workloads.

I suppose I could try your patches if I find a moment for it.

I'm aware of one more bug which affects my Etron: if an error occurs on an isochronous TD, two events are generated: first the error, then "success", even if the error is on the final TRB (the common case). Then the "success" causes "TRB DMA not part of current TD" warning. I suspect that all Etron chips are the same. This should be easily reproducible by unpligging an audio/video device while streaming.

Considering how utterly broken this hardware is, I think it could be more efficient to have a single "Etron host" quirk. These bugs are so stupid that it seems unlikely that any of Etron quirks would ever be reused on other hardware. Of course it should still use "general" quirks when applicable, such as "broken streams", which it does IIRC.

Regards,
Michal

#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 0/3] xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host

Hi,

Thank you for the review.

Michał Pecio <[email protected]> 於 2024年9月11日 週三 下午3:38寫道:

Quoted 6 lines

Hi,

I have some Etron controller (forgot which one) but I'm not using it because it crashes ("dies") all the time under my workloads.

Quoted 8 lines

I suppose I could try your patches if I find a moment for it.

I'm aware of one more bug which affects my Etron: if an error occurs on an isochronous TD, two events are generated: first the error, then "success", even if the error is on the final TRB (the common case). Then the "success" causes "TRB DMA not part of current TD" warning. I suspect that all Etron chips are the same. This should be easily reproducible by unpligging an audio/video device while streaming.

Hmm, I don't encounter this problem.

Quoted 7 lines

Considering how utterly broken this hardware is, I think it could be more efficient to have a single "Etron host" quirk. These bugs are so stupid that it seems unlikely that any of Etron quirks would ever be reused on other hardware. Of course it should still use "general" quirks when applicable, such as "broken streams", which it does IIRC.

Ok, I will use one quirk XHCI_ETRON_HOST for these workarounds in the next patch revision.

Quoted 2 lines

Regards,
Michal

Thanks,
Kuangyi Chiang

#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 0/3] xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host

Hi,

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines

I'm aware of one more bug which affects my Etron: if an error occurs on an isochronous TD, two events are generated: first the error, then "success", even if the error is on the final TRB (the common case). Then the "success" causes "TRB DMA not part of current TD" warning. I suspect that all Etron chips are the same. This should be easily reproducible by unpligging an audio/video device while streaming.

Hmm, I don't encounter this problem.

OK, I know what happened. This bug only affects SuperSpeed isochronous endpoints. If you don't have this kind of device, you will not see it. I checked that High-speed isochronous errors are reported correctly.

My motivation to develop a workaround for this bug has just decreased another notch.

On the other hand, I was unable to reproduce the control transfer bug. The exact chip I have is labeled "EtronTech EJ168A", for the record.

You are right, not all transfers have the data stage and transactions get out of sync with segment boundaries. I modified the patch to only print a warning instead of queuing a No-Op and then did various things which use control transactions: setting baud rate on serial, changing the volume on audio, starting video recording on a webcam, running ethtool on a NIC.

The warning was printed a few times, but nothing interesting happened. Dynamic debug was enabled on handle_tx_event() - no errors reported.

Maybe a different silicon/firmware revision, or maybe it's another SuperSpeed-only bug, or other special conditions for it to happen?

Quoted 2 lines

Ok, I will use one quirk XHCI_ETRON_HOST for these workarounds in the next patch revision.

That was just a suggestion, you should ask Mathias Nyman, I suppose.

But, again, my impression of this hardware is that it's pretty bad and full of bugs, and they are bizarre enough to likely be unique.

Regards,
Michal

#12 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 0/3] xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host

Hi,

Thank you for testing the patch.

Michał Pecio <[email protected]> 於 2024年9月12日 週四 下午3:12寫道:

Quoted 31 lines

Hi,

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines

I'm aware of one more bug which affects my Etron: if an error occurs on an isochronous TD, two events are generated: first the error, then "success", even if the error is on the final TRB (the common case). Then the "success" causes "TRB DMA not part of current TD" warning. I suspect that all Etron chips are the same. This should be easily reproducible by unpligging an audio/video device while streaming.

Hmm, I don't encounter this problem.

OK, I know what happened. This bug only affects SuperSpeed isochronous endpoints. If you don't have this kind of device, you will not see it. I checked that High-speed isochronous errors are reported correctly.

My motivation to develop a workaround for this bug has just decreased another notch.

On the other hand, I was unable to reproduce the control transfer bug. The exact chip I have is labeled "EtronTech EJ168A", for the record.

You are right, not all transfers have the data stage and transactions get out of sync with segment boundaries. I modified the patch to only print a warning instead of queuing a No-Op and then did various things which use control transactions: setting baud rate on serial, changing the volume on audio, starting video recording on a webcam, running ethtool on a NIC.

Quoted 5 lines

The warning was printed a few times, but nothing interesting happened. Dynamic debug was enabled on handle_tx_event() - no errors reported.

Maybe a different silicon/firmware revision, or maybe it's another SuperSpeed-only bug, or other special conditions for it to happen?

Do you see any "Transfer error for slot..." error message? What is the speed of your device? high speed?
I try to downgrade my ethernet adapter to high speed and do some tests, no errors are reported in dmesg if dynamic debug is enabled. I think it is a super speed issue, however, it doesn't happen on the high speed device, I am not sure. So the patch will not check the speed of the device.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Ok, I will use one quirk XHCI_ETRON_HOST for these workarounds in the next patch revision.

That was just a suggestion, you should ask Mathias Nyman, I suppose.

OK, thanks.

Quoted 6 lines

But, again, my impression of this hardware is that it's pretty bad and full of bugs, and they are bizarre enough to likely be unique.

Regards,
Michal

Thanks,
Kuangyi Chiang