arm64: stacktrace: WARN_ON(state->common.pc == orig_pc) in kunwind_recover_return_address()
I don't know the details but people report that kunwind_recover_return_address() hits this warning.
I know absolutely nothing about arm64 or kernel/trace/fgraph.c, but at first glance this code looks broken:
kunwind_recover_return_address: ... orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(state->task, NULL, state->common.pc, (void *)state->common.fp); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->common.pc == orig_pc)) ftrace_graph_ret_addr: ... if (!idx) return ret;
given that kunwind_recover_return_address() passes idx == NULL to ftrace_graph_ret_addr(), it should always return ret == state->common.pc ?
Perhaps this connects to 29c1c24a27 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()") and I have no idea if something like the patch below makes any sense.
Oleg.
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +2 -1
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ kunwind_recover_return_address(struct kunwind_state *state)if (state->task->ret_stack && (state->common.pc == (unsigned long )return_to_handler)) {unsigned long orig_pc; - orig_pc =ftrace_graph_ret_addr (state->task,NULL , + orig_pc =ftrace_graph_ret_addr (state->task, + &state->task->curr_ret_stack, state->common.pc, (void *)state->common.fp);if (WARN_ON_ONCE (state->common.pc == orig_pc))
Quoted 23 lines · Oleg Nesterov
I don't know the details but people report that
kunwind_recover_return_address()hits this warning.I know absolutely nothing about arm64 or
kernel/trace/fgraph.c, but at first glance this code looks broken:kunwind_recover_return_address: ... orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(state->task, NULL, state->common.pc, (void *)state->common.fp); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->common.pc == orig_pc)) ftrace_graph_ret_addr: ... if (!idx) return ret;
Quoted 7 lines
given that
kunwind_recover_return_address()passes idx == NULL toftrace_graph_ret_addr(), it should always return ret ==state->common.pc?Perhaps this connects to
29c1c24a27("function_graph: Fix upftrace_graph_ret_addr()") and I have no idea if something like the patch below makes any sense.
Your finding is accurate.
It has been fixed in upstream by c060f93253ca ("arm64: stacktrace: fix the usage of ftrace_graph_ret_addr()")
See: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11/source/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c#L111
Thanks,
Puranjay
Ah, sorry for the noise, I looked into the wrong tree, missed the recent c060f93253ca ("arm64: stacktrace: fix the usage of ftrace_graph_ret_addr()")
Quoted 45 lines · Oleg Nesterov
I don't know the details but people report that
kunwind_recover_return_address()hits this warning.I know absolutely nothing about arm64 or
kernel/trace/fgraph.c, but at first glance this code looks broken:kunwind_recover_return_address: ... orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(state->task, NULL, state->common.pc, (void *)state->common.fp); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->common.pc == orig_pc)) ftrace_graph_ret_addr: ... if (!idx) return ret;given that
kunwind_recover_return_address()passes idx == NULL toftrace_graph_ret_addr(), it should always return ret ==state->common.pc?Perhaps this connects to
29c1c24a27("function_graph: Fix upftrace_graph_ret_addr()") and I have no idea if something like the patch below makes any sense.Oleg.
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +2
-1@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ kunwind_recover_return_address(struct kunwind_state *state)if (state->task->ret_stack && (state->common.pc == (unsigned long )return_to_handler)) {unsigned long orig_pc; - orig_pc =ftrace_graph_ret_addr (state->task,NULL , + orig_pc =ftrace_graph_ret_addr (state->task, + &state->task->curr_ret_stack, state->common.pc, (void *)state->common.fp);if (WARN_ON_ONCE (state->common.pc == orig_pc))
Quoted 7 lines · Puranjay Mohan
Quoted 4 lines · Oleg Nesterov
given that
kunwind_recover_return_address()passes idx == NULL toftrace_graph_ret_addr(), it should always return ret ==state->common.pc?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Perhaps this connects to
29c1c24a27("function_graph: Fix upftrace_graph_ret_addr()") and I have no idea if something like the patch below makes any sense.Your finding is accurate.
It has been fixed in upstream by
c060f93253ca("arm64: stacktrace: fix the usage offtrace_graph_ret_addr()")
Yes, I have already found that commit, see my next email ;)
Nevertheless, thanks a lot Puranjay for the confirmation!
Oleg.