WTF: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Remove duplicated GET_RM" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 6.11-stable tree?
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below was submitted to be applied to the 6.11-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <[email protected]> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 164f66de6bb6ef454893f193c898dc8f1da6d18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:41:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Remove duplicated GET_RM
The macro GET_RM defined twice in this file, one can be removed.
Reviewed-by Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
Fixes 956d705dd279 ("riscv: Unaligned load/store handling for M_MODE")
Signed-off-by Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c +0 -2
@@ -136,8 +136,6 @@#define REG_PTR (insn, pos, regs) \ (ulong *)((ulong)(regs) + REG_OFFSET(insn, pos)) -#define GET_RM (insn) (((insn) >> 12) & 7) -#define GET_RS1 (insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS1, regs))#define GET_RS2 (insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS2, regs))#define GET_RS1S (insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(RVC_RS1S(insn), 0, regs))