symlink length caching
Subsystems (7)
v2 cover symlink length caching
quote:
When utilized it dodges strlen() in vfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.
Benchmark code at the bottom.
ext4 and tmpfs are patched, other filesystems can also get there with some more work.
Arguably the current get_link API should be patched to let the fs return the size, but that's not a churn I'm interested into diving in.
On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
To elaborate here are highlights while benching on Sapphire Rapids:
1. putname using atomics (over 3.5% on my profile)
sounds like Al has plans to do something here(?), I'm not touching it if it can be helped. the atomic definitely does not have to be there in the common case.
2. kmem_cache_alloc_noprof/kmem_cache_free (over 7% combined)
They are both dog slow due to cmpxchg16b. A patchset was posted which
adds a different allocation/free fast path which should whack majority
of the problem, see: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
If this lands I'll definitely try to make the pathname allocs use it, should drop about 5-6 percentage points on this sucker.
3. __legitimize_mnt issues a full fence (again over 3%)
As far as avoiding the fence is concerned waiting on rcu grace period on unmount should do the trick. However, I found there is a bunch complexity there to sort out before doing this will be feasible (notably there are multiple mounts freed in one go, this needs to be batched). There may be other issues which I missed and which make this not worth it, but the fence is definitely avoidable in principle and I would be surprised if there was no way to sensibly get there. No ETA, for now I'm just pointing this out.
There is also the idea to speculatively elide lockref, but when I tried that last time I ran into significant LSM-related trouble.
All that aside there is also quite a bit of branching and func calling which does not need to be there (example: make vfsuid/vfsgid, could be combined into one routine etc.).
Ultimately there is single-threaded perf left on the table in various spots.
v2:
- add a dedicated field, flag and a helper instead of using i_size
- constify i_link
v1 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/
benchmark:
plug into will-it-scale into tests/readlink1.c:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
char *testcase_description = "readlink /initrd.img";
void testcase(unsigned long long *iterations, unsigned long nr)
{
char *tmplink = "/initrd.img";
char buf[1024];
while (1) {
int error = readlink(tmplink, buf, sizeof(buf));
assert(error > 0);
(*iterations)++;
}
}Mateusz Guzik (3):
vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes
ext4: use inode_set_cached_link()
tmpfs: use inode_set_cached_link()
fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 +++- fs/namei.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/proc/namespaces.c | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 12 ++++++++++-- mm/shmem.c | 6 ++++-- security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v2 1/3 vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes
When utilized it dodges strlen() in vfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.
Filesystems opt in by calling inode_set_cached_link() when creating an inode.
The size is stored in what used to be a 4-byte hole. If necessary the field can be made smaller and converted into a union with something not used with symlinks.
Churn-wise the current readlink_copy() helper is patched to accept the size instead of calculating it.
--- fs/namei.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/proc/namespaces.c | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 12 ++++++++++-- security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
fs/namei.c +19 -15
@@ -5272,19 +5272,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(rename, const char __user *, oldname, const char __user *, newna getname(newname), 0); } -int readlink_copy (char __user *buffer,int buflen,const char *link) +int readlink_copy (char __user *buffer,int buflen,const char *link,int linklen) { -int len =PTR_ERR (link); -if (IS_ERR (link)) - goto out; +int copylen; - len =strlen (link); -if (len > (unsigned ) buflen) - len = buflen; -if (copy_to_user (buffer, link, len)) - len = -EFAULT ; -out: -return len; + copylen = linklen; +if (unlikely (copylen > (unsigned ) buflen)) + copylen = buflen; +if (copy_to_user (buffer, link, copylen)) + copylen = -EFAULT ; +return copylen; }/**
@@ -5304,6 +5301,9 @@ int vfs_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen)const char *link;int res; +if (inode->i_opflags &IOP_CACHED_LINK ) +return readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, inode->i_link, inode->i_linklen); +if (unlikely (!(inode->i_opflags &IOP_DEFAULT_READLINK ))) {if (unlikely (inode->i_op->readlink))return inode->i_op->readlink (dentry, buffer, buflen);
@@ -5322,7 +5322,7 @@ int vfs_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen)if (IS_ERR (link))return PTR_ERR (link); } - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link,strlen (link));do_delayed_call (&done);return res; }
@@ -5391,10 +5391,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_put_link);int page_readlink (struct dentry *dentry,char __user *buffer,int buflen) { +const char *link; +int res; +DEFINE_DELAYED_CALL (done); -int res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, -page_get_link (dentry,d_inode (dentry), - &done)); + link =page_get_link (dentry,d_inode (dentry), &done); + res =PTR_ERR (link); +if (!IS_ERR (link)) + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link,strlen (link));do_delayed_call (&done);return res; }
fs/proc/namespaces.c +1 -1
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int proc_ns_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflif (ptrace_may_access (task,PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS )) { res =ns_get_name (name,sizeof (name), task, ns_ops);if (res >=0 ) - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name,strlen (name)); }put_task_struct (task);return res;
include/linux/fs.h +10 -2
@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ is_uncached_acl(struct posix_acl *acl)#define IOP_XATTR 0x0008#define IOP_DEFAULT_READLINK 0x0010#define IOP_MGTIME 0x0020 +#define IOP_CACHED_LINK 0x0040/* * Keep mostly read-only and often accessed (especially for
@@ -686,7 +687,7 @@ struct inode {/* Misc */ u32 i_state; -/* 32-bit hole */ +int i_linklen;/* for symlinks */ struct rw_semaphore i_rwsem;unsigned long dirtied_when;/* jiffies of first dirtying */
@@ -749,6 +750,13 @@ struct inode {void *i_private;/* fs or device private pointer */ } __randomize_layout; +static inline void inode_set_cached_link (struct inode *inode,char *link,int linklen) +{ + inode->i_link = link; + inode->i_linklen = linklen; + inode->i_opflags |=IOP_CACHED_LINK ; +} +/* * Get bit address from inode->i_state to use with wait_var_event() * infrastructre.
@@ -3351,7 +3359,7 @@ extern const struct file_operations generic_ro_fops;#define special_file (m) (S_ISCHR(m)||S_ISBLK(m)||S_ISFIFO(m)||S_ISSOCK(m)) -extern int readlink_copy (char __user *,int ,const char *); +extern int readlink_copy (char __user *,int ,const char *,int );extern int page_readlink (struct dentry *,char __user *,int );extern const char *page_get_link (struct dentry *,struct inode *,struct delayed_call *);
security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c +1 -1
@@ -2611,7 +2611,7 @@ static int policy_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, res =snprintf (name,sizeof (name),"%s:[%lu]" ,AAFS_NAME ,d_inode (dentry)->i_ino);if (res >0 && res <sizeof (name)) - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name,strlen (name));else res = -ENOENT ;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes
Quoted 125 lines · Mateusz Guzik
When utilized it dodges
strlen()invfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.Filesystems opt in by calling
inode_set_cached_link()when creating an inode.The size is stored in what used to be a 4-byte hole. If necessary the field can be made smaller and converted into a union with something not used with symlinks.
Churn-wise the current
readlink_copy()helper is patched to accept the size instead of calculating it.Signed-off-by Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>--- fs/namei.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/proc/namespaces.c | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 12 ++++++++++-- security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)fs/namei.c +19
-15@@ -5272,19 +5272,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(rename, const char __user *, oldname, const char __user *, newna getname(newname), 0); } -int readlink_copy (char __user *buffer,int buflen,const char *link) +int readlink_copy (char __user *buffer,int buflen,const char *link,int linklen) { -int len =PTR_ERR (link); -if (IS_ERR (link)) - goto out; +int copylen; - len =strlen (link); -if (len > (unsigned ) buflen) - len = buflen; -if (copy_to_user (buffer, link, len)) - len = -EFAULT ; -out: -return len; + copylen = linklen; +if (unlikely (copylen > (unsigned ) buflen)) + copylen = buflen; +if (copy_to_user (buffer, link, copylen)) + copylen = -EFAULT ; +return copylen; }/** @@ -5304,6 +5301,9 @@ int vfs_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen)const char *link;int res; +if (inode->i_opflags &IOP_CACHED_LINK ) +return readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, inode->i_link, inode->i_linklen); +if (unlikely (!(inode->i_opflags &IOP_DEFAULT_READLINK ))) {if (unlikely (inode->i_op->readlink))return inode->i_op->readlink (dentry, buffer, buflen);@@ -5322,7 +5322,7 @@ int vfs_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen)if (IS_ERR (link))return PTR_ERR (link); } - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link,strlen (link));do_delayed_call (&done);return res; }@@ -5391,10 +5391,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_put_link);int page_readlink (struct dentry *dentry,char __user *buffer,int buflen) { +const char *link; +int res; +DEFINE_DELAYED_CALL (done); -int res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, -page_get_link (dentry,d_inode (dentry), - &done)); + link =page_get_link (dentry,d_inode (dentry), &done); + res =PTR_ERR (link); +if (!IS_ERR (link)) + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, link,strlen (link));do_delayed_call (&done);return res; }fs/proc/namespaces.c +1
-1@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int proc_ns_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflif (ptrace_may_access (task,PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS )) { res =ns_get_name (name,sizeof (name), task, ns_ops);if (res >=0 ) - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name,strlen (name)); }put_task_struct (task);return res;include/linux/fs.h +2
-1@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ is_uncached_acl(struct posix_acl *acl)#define IOP_XATTR 0x0008#define IOP_DEFAULT_READLINK 0x0010#define IOP_MGTIME 0x0020 +#define IOP_CACHED_LINK 0x0040/* * Keep mostly read-only and often accessed (especially for @@ -686,7 +687,7 @@ struct inode {/* Misc */ u32 i_state; -/* 32-bit hole */ +int i_linklen;/* for symlinks */ struct rw_semaphore i_rwsem;unsigned long dirtied_when;/* jiffies of first dirtying */
include/linux/fs.h struct inode { · line 756
Quoted 7 lines
include/linux/fs.h +4
-0@@ -749,6 +750,13 @@ struct inode {void *i_private;/* fs or device private pointer */ } __randomize_layout; +static inline void inode_set_cached_link (struct inode *inode,char *link,int linklen) +{ + inode->i_link = link; + inode->i_linklen = linklen;
Just curious, is this linklen equal to inode size? if it is, why don't use it?
Quoted 28 lines
include/linux/fs.h +4
-1+ inode->i_opflags |=IOP_CACHED_LINK ; +} +/* * Get bit address from inode->i_state to use with wait_var_event() * infrastructre. @@ -3351,7 +3359,7 @@ extern const struct file_operations generic_ro_fops;#define special_file (m) (S_ISCHR(m)||S_ISBLK(m)||S_ISFIFO(m)||S_ISSOCK(m)) -extern int readlink_copy (char __user *,int ,const char *); +extern int readlink_copy (char __user *,int ,const char *,int );extern int page_readlink (struct dentry *,char __user *,int );extern const char *page_get_link (struct dentry *,struct inode *,struct delayed_call *);security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c +1
-1@@ -2611,7 +2611,7 @@ static int policy_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, res =snprintf (name,sizeof (name),"%s:[%lu]" ,AAFS_NAME ,d_inode (dentry)->i_ino);if (res >0 && res <sizeof (name)) - res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name); + res =readlink_copy (buffer, buflen, name,strlen (name));else res = -ENOENT ;
Signature · 1 line
Regards
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes
Quoted 5 lines · wangjianjian (C)
include/linux/fs.h struct inode { · line 756
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/fs.h +3
-0+{ + inode->i_link = link; + inode->i_linklen = linklen;Just curious, is this linklen equal to inode size? if it is, why don't use it?
Maybe you should read v1 of the patch series where Jan explained where that's not true.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes
Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Wilcox
Quoted 5 lines · wangjianjian (C)
include/linux/fs.h struct inode { · line 756
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/fs.h +3
-0+{ + inode->i_link = link; + inode->i_linklen = linklen;Just curious, is this linklen equal to inode size? if it is, why don't use it?
Maybe you should read v1 of the patch series where Jan explained where that's not true.
okay, I see, thanks for this.
Quoted 1 line
Signature · 1 line
Regards
PATCH v2 2/3 ext4: use inode_set_cached_link()
In reply to Mateusz Guzik--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +2 -1
@@ -5006,10 +5006,11 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,if (IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) { inode->i_op = &ext4_encrypted_symlink_inode_operations; }else if (ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink (inode)) { - inode->i_link = (char *)ei->i_data; inode->i_op = &ext4_fast_symlink_inode_operations;nd_terminate_link (ei->i_data, inode->i_size,sizeof (ei->i_data) -1 ); +inode_set_cached_link (inode, (char *)ei->i_data, + inode->i_size); }else { inode->i_op = &ext4_symlink_inode_operations; }
fs/ext4/namei.c +3 -1
@@ -3418,7 +3418,6 @@ static int ext4_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir, inode->i_op = &ext4_symlink_inode_operations; }else { inode->i_op = &ext4_fast_symlink_inode_operations; - inode->i_link = (char *)&EXT4_I (inode)->i_data; } }
@@ -3434,6 +3433,9 @@ static int ext4_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir, disk_link.len); inode->i_size = disk_link.len -1 ;EXT4_I (inode)->i_disksize = inode->i_size; +if (!IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) +inode_set_cached_link (inode, (char *)&EXT4_I (inode)->i_data, + inode->i_size); } err =ext4_add_nondir (handle, dentry, &inode);if (handle)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v2 3/3 tmpfs: use inode_set_cached_link()
In reply to Mateusz Guzik--- mm/shmem.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/shmem.c +4 -2
@@ -3870,6 +3870,7 @@ static int shmem_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,int len;struct inode *inode;struct folio *folio; +char *link; len =strlen (symname) +1 ;if (len >PAGE_SIZE )
@@ -3891,12 +3892,13 @@ static int shmem_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir, inode->i_size = len-1 ;if (len <=SHORT_SYMLINK_LEN ) { - inode->i_link =kmemdup (symname, len,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!inode->i_link) { + link =kmemdup (symname, len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!link) { error = -ENOMEM ; goto out_remove_offset; } inode->i_op = &shmem_short_symlink_operations; +inode_set_cached_link (inode, link, len -1 ); }else {inode_nohighmem (inode); inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &shmem_aops;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Theodore Ts'o
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · Mateusz Guzik
On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
Do you have a workload in mind which calls readlink() at sufficiently high numbers such that this would be noticeable in non-micro-benchmarks? What motiviated you to do this work?
Thanks,
- Ted
Quoted 11 lines · Theodore Ts'o
Quoted 4 lines · Mateusz Guzik
On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
Do you have a workload in mind which calls
readlink()at sufficiently high numbers such that this would be noticeable in non-micro-benchmarks? What motiviated you to do this work?
I'm just messing about here. Given the triviality of the patch I'm not sure where the objection is coming from. I can point a finger at changes made by other people for supposed perf gains which are virtually guaranteed to be invisible in isolation, just like this one.
Anyhow, I landed here from strlen -- the sucker is operating one byte at a time which I was looking to sort out, but then I noticed that one of the more commonly executing consumers does not even need to call it.
Signature · 1 line
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Christian Brauner
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Mateusz Guzik
quote:
When utilized it dodgesstrlen()invfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.Benchmark code at the bottom.
ext4 and tmpfs are patched, other filesystems can also get there with some more work.
Quoted 6 lines
Arguably the current
get_linkAPI should be patched to let the fs return the size, but that's not a churn I'm interested into diving in.On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
The thing is that you're stealing one of the holes I just put into struct inode a cycle ago or so. The general idea has been to shrink struct inode if we can and I'm not sure that caching the link length is actually worth losing that hole. Otherwise I wouldn't object.
Quoted 3 lines
All that aside there is also quite a bit of branching and func calling which does not need to be there (example: make vfsuid/vfsgid, could be combined into one routine etc.).
They should probably also be made inline functions and likely/unlikely sprinkled in there.
Quoted 14 lines · Christian Brauner
Quoted 12 lines · Mateusz Guzik
quote:
When utilized it dodgesstrlen()invfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.Benchmark code at the bottom.
ext4 and tmpfs are patched, other filesystems can also get there with some more work.
Arguably the current
get_linkAPI should be patched to let the fs return the size, but that's not a churn I'm interested into diving in.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
The thing is that you're stealing one of the holes I just put into struct inode a cycle ago or so. The general idea has been to shrink struct inode if we can and I'm not sure that caching the link length is actually worth losing that hole. Otherwise I wouldn't object.
Per the patch description this can be a union with something not used for symlinks. I'll find a nice field.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
All that aside there is also quite a bit of branching and func calling which does not need to be there (example: make vfsuid/vfsgid, could be combined into one routine etc.).
They should probably also be made inline functions and likely/unlikely sprinkled in there.
someone(tm) should at least do a sweep through in-vfs code. for example LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED is sometimes marked as unlikely and other times has no annotations whatsoever, even though ultimately it all executes in the same setting
Interestingly even __read_seqcount_begin (used *twice* in path_init()) is missing one. I sent a patch to fix it long time ago but the recipient did not respond, maybe I should resend with more people in cc (who though?), see:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Signature · 1 line
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Christian Brauner
maintainerQuoted 19 lines · Mateusz Guzik
Quoted 18 lines · Christian Brauner
Quoted 15 lines · Mateusz Guzik
quote:
When utilized it dodgesstrlen()invfs_readlink(), giving about 1.5% speed up when issuing readlink on /initrd.img on ext4.Benchmark code at the bottom.
ext4 and tmpfs are patched, other filesystems can also get there with some more work.
Arguably the current
get_linkAPI should be patched to let the fs return the size, but that's not a churn I'm interested into diving in.On my v1 Jan remarked 1.5% is not a particularly high win questioning whether doing this makes sense. I noted the value is only this small because of other slowdowns.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
The thing is that you're stealing one of the holes I just put into struct inode a cycle ago or so. The general idea has been to shrink struct inode if we can and I'm not sure that caching the link length is actually worth losing that hole. Otherwise I wouldn't object.
Per the patch description this can be a union with something not used for symlinks. I'll find a nice field.
Ok!
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
All that aside there is also quite a bit of branching and func calling which does not need to be there (example: make vfsuid/vfsgid, could be combined into one routine etc.).
They should probably also be made inline functions and likely/unlikely sprinkled in there.
someone(tm) should at least do a sweep through in-vfs code. for
Yeah, in this case I was specifically talking about make_vfs{g,u}id(). They should be inlines and they should contain likely/unlikely.
Quoted 7 lines
example
LOOKUP_IS_SCOPEDis sometimes marked as unlikely and other times has no annotations whatsoever, even though ultimately it all executes in the same settingInterestingly even
__read_seqcount_begin(used *twice* inpath_init()) is missing one. I sent a patch to fix it long time ago but the recipient did not respond
I snatched it.
Quoted 7 lines · Christian Brauner
Quoted 3 lines · Mateusz Guzik
Interestingly even
__read_seqcount_begin(used *twice* inpath_init()) is missing one. I sent a patch to fix it long time ago but the recipient did not respondI snatched it.
Thanks.
But I have to say having *two* counters to check for each lookup is bothering me and making me wonder if they could be unified (or another counter added to cover for either of those?)? No clue about feasibility, is there a known showstopper?
Both are defined like so:__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(mount_lock); __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(rename_lock);
Suppose nothing can be done to only look at one counter on lookup.
In that case how about combining the suckers into one cacheline at least? Sure, this will result in new bounces for threads modifying these, but this is relatively infrequent compared to how often lookups performed and with these slapped together there will be only one line spent on it, instead of two.
Just RFC'ing it here.
Signature · 1 line
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>