regulator: axp20x: AXP717: set ramp_delay
PATCH 1/1 regulator: axp20x: AXP717: set ramp_delay
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
Add a AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY macro and update AXP_DESC_RANGES macro to expand to AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY with ramp_delay = 0
--- drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +15 -8
@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ .ops = &axp20x_ops_fixed \ } -#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ - _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, _ramp_delay) \ [_family##_##_id] = { \ .name = (_match), \ .supply_name = (_supply), \
@@ -437,8 +437,15 @@ .linear_ranges = (_ranges), \ .n_linear_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(_ranges), \ .ops = &axp20x_ops_range, \ + .ramp_delay = (_ramp_delay), \ } +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ + AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY(_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, 0) + +static const int axp209_dcdc2_ldo3_slew_rates[] = {1600 ,800 ,
@@ -781,18 +788,18 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { };static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = { -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , axp717_dcdc1_ranges,AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC1_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 )), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 ),640 ), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , axp717_dcdc2_ranges,AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC2_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 )), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 ),640 ), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , axp717_dcdc3_ranges,AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC3_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 )), +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 ),640 ),AXP_DESC (AXP717 ,DCDC4 ,"dcdc4" ,"vin4" ,1000 ,3700 ,100 ,AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK ,AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (3 )),
Signature · 1 line
2.47.1
Mark Brown
maintainerdrivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { · line 794
Quoted 6 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
static const struct
regulator_descaxp717_regulators[] = {drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +2
-0+AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , + AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0), 640),
This doesn't seem to match with the above - ramp_delay is in units of uV/us?
Quoted 11 lines · Mark Brown
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { · line 794
Quoted 6 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
static const struct
regulator_descaxp717_regulators[] = {drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +2
-0+AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , + AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0), 640),This doesn't seem to match with the above -
ramp_delayis in units of uV/us?
15.625 us / 10mV = 1.5625 us/mV = 0.0015625 us/uV
0.0015625^-1 = 640 uV/us
Or did I miss too many math lessons...
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Philippe Simons
Quoted 6 lines · Mark Brown
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { · line 794
Quoted 3 lines
static const struct
regulator_descaxp717_regulators[] = {drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +2
-0+AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , + AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0), 640),This doesn't seem to match with the above -
ramp_delayis in units of uV/us?15.625 us / 10mV = 1.5625 us/mV = 0.0015625 us/uV
0.0015625^-1 = 640 uV/us
Ah, yes - sorry - I typed when I did the calculation.
Quoted 8 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 5 lines · Philippe Simons
Quoted 3 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 3 lines
static const struct
regulator_descaxp717_regulators[] = {drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +2
-0+AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , + AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0), 640),
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
This doesn't seem to match with the above -
ramp_delayis in units of uV/us?15.625 us / 10mV = 1.5625 us/mV = 0.0015625 us/uV
0.0015625^-1 = 640 uV/usAh, yes - sorry - I typed when I did the calculation.
No problem.
BTW: this patch is critical to at least Anbernic H700 based devices. Without it, DVFS crashes very quickly.
This patch resolves the freezing issue. Tested on Anbernic RG35XX Plus with AXP717 PMIC.
Quoted 3 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
Thanks! It looks like the reason the delay is needed is because the voltage ramp control feature is on by default on this chip.
That is not entirely correct. 10mV is the smallest step forDCDC1, DCDC2, and DCDC3, so it makes sense to calculate the ramp delay using that.
For DCDC4, the step is 100mV, so the delay would be different.
Quoted 4 lines
Add a
AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYmacro and updateAXP_DESC_RANGESmacro to expand toAXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYwithramp_delay= 0Signed-off-by Philippe Simons <[email protected]>
The ramp rate / delay is actually configurable between 15.625 us/step and 31.250 us/step. However the setting shared among all DCDCs that support this function and have it turned on. I'm not sure how that should be modeled if we want to make it configurable.
Also looking at older AXP PMICs:
- AXP803: ramp rate 2.5mV / us, on by default, has register bit that can polled to check for ramp completion
- AXP813: same as AXP803
- AXP805: Similar to AXP717, where rate is given in time / step, the options are the same two and step is different for different buck regulators; difference is not all buck regulators support this feature, and also the rate is individually configurable for each one. Off by default.
- AXP223: 1.6mV/us or 0.8mV/us; off by default; only two buck regulators support it; individually configurable.
Quoted 48 lines
--- drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +12
-5@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ .ops = &axp20x_ops_fixed \ } -#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ - _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, _ramp_delay) \ [_family##_##_id] = { \ .name = (_match), \ .supply_name = (_supply), \@@ -437,8 +437,15 @@ .linear_ranges = (_ranges), \ .n_linear_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(_ranges), \ .ops = &axp20x_ops_range, \ + .ramp_delay = (_ramp_delay), \ } +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ + AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY(_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, 0) + +static const int axp209_dcdc2_ldo3_slew_rates[] = {1600 ,800 ,@@ -781,18 +788,18 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { };static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = { -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , axp717_dcdc1_ranges,AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC1_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 )), - AXP_DESC_RANGES(AXP717, DCDC2, "dcdc2", "vin2", +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 ),640 ), + AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY(AXP717, DCDC2, "dcdc2", "vin2", axp717_dcdc2_ranges, AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES,
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { · line 803
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +3
-3AXP717_DCDC2_CONTROL, AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK, - AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , + AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1), 640), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , axp717_dcdc3_ranges,AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC3_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 )), +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 ),640 ), AXP_DESC(AXP717, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", 1000, 3700, 100,
Can you also add it to DCDC4 for completeness?
Thanks
ChenYu
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +0
-1AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)), --2.47.1
Quoted 19 lines · Chen-Yu Tsai
Quoted 3 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
Thanks! It looks like the reason the delay is needed is because the voltage ramp control feature is on by default on this chip.
That is not entirely correct. 10mV is the smallest step forDCDC1, DCDC2, and DCDC3, so it makes sense to calculate the ramp delay using that.
For DCDC4, the step is 100mV, so the delay would be different.
Quoted 3 lines
Add a
AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYmacro and updateAXP_DESC_RANGESmacro to expand toAXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYwithramp_delay= 0
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Philippe Simons <[email protected]>The ramp rate / delay is actually configurable between 15.625 us/step and 31.250 us/step. However the setting shared among all DCDCs that support this function and have it turned on. I'm not sure how that should be modeled if we want to make it configurable.
there is axp20x_set_ramp_delay() ops, but it seems to only handle axp209 DCDC2 and LDO3
Quoted 68 lines
Also looking at older AXP PMICs:
- AXP803: ramp rate 2.5mV / us, on by default, has register bit that can polled to check for ramp completion
- AXP813: same as AXP803- AXP805: Similar to AXP717, where rate is given in time / step, the options are the same two and step is different for different buck regulators; difference is not all buck regulators support this feature, and also the rate is individually configurable for each one. Off by default.
- AXP223: 1.6mV/us or 0.8mV/us; off by default; only two buck regulators support it; individually configurable.
Quoted 52 lines
--- drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +13
-7@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ .ops = &axp20x_ops_fixed \ } -#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ - _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, _ramp_delay) \ [_family##_##_id] = { \ .name = (_match), \ .supply_name = (_supply), \@@ -437,8 +437,15 @@ .linear_ranges = (_ranges), \ .n_linear_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(_ranges), \ .ops = &axp20x_ops_range, \ + .ramp_delay = (_ramp_delay), \ } +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ + AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY(_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, 0) + +static const int axp209_dcdc2_ldo3_slew_rates[] = {1600 ,800 ,@@ -781,18 +788,18 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { };static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = { -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , axp717_dcdc1_ranges,AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC1_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 )), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 ),640 ), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , axp717_dcdc2_ranges,AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC2_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 )), - AXP_DESC_RANGES(AXP717, DCDC3, "dcdc3", "vin3", +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 ),640 ),
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { · line 803
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +2
-1+AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , axp717_dcdc3_ranges,AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC3_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , - AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)), +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 ),640 ), AXP_DESC(AXP717, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", 1000, 3700, 100,Can you also add it to DCDC4 for completeness?
I'll do in V2
Quoted 11 lines
Thanks
ChenYuQuoted 5 lines
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +0
-1AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)), --2.47.1
Quoted 70 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
Add a
AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYmacro and updateAXP_DESC_RANGESmacro to expand toAXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYwithramp_delay= 0Signed-off-by Philippe Simons <[email protected]>--- drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c +15
-8@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ .ops = &axp20x_ops_fixed \ } -#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ - _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, _ramp_delay) \ [_family##_##_id] = { \ .name = (_match), \ .supply_name = (_supply), \@@ -437,8 +437,15 @@ .linear_ranges = (_ranges), \ .n_linear_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(_ranges), \ .ops = &axp20x_ops_range, \ + .ramp_delay = (_ramp_delay), \ } +#define AXP_DESC_RANGES (_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask) \ + AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY(_family, _id, _match, _supply, _ranges, _n_voltages, \ + _vreg, _vmask, _ereg, _emask, 0) + +static const int axp209_dcdc2_ldo3_slew_rates[] = {1600 ,800 ,@@ -781,18 +788,18 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = { };static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = { -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC1 ,"dcdc1" ,"vin1" , axp717_dcdc1_ranges,AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC1_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 )), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (0 ),640 ), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC2 ,"dcdc2" ,"vin2" , axp717_dcdc2_ranges,AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC2_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 )), -AXP_DESC_RANGES (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (1 ),640 ), +AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY (AXP717 ,DCDC3 ,"dcdc3" ,"vin3" , axp717_dcdc3_ranges,AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES ,AXP717_DCDC3_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK , -AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 )), +AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (2 ),640 ),AXP_DESC (AXP717 ,DCDC4 ,"dcdc4" ,"vin4" ,1000 ,3700 ,100 ,AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL ,AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK ,AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL ,BIT (3 )),Signature · 1 line
2.47.1
This series solves the immediate crashes I get on startup when I use schedutil as my cpu scheduler.
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Philippe Simons
AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case.
Add a
AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYmacro and updateAXP_DESC_RANGESmacro to expand toAXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAYwithramp_delay= 0[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: set ramp_delay
commit: f07ae52f5cf6a5584fdf7c8c652f027d90bc8b74
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark