Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jan 6, 2025

Subsystems (5)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 8ec396d05d1b737c87311fb7311f753b02c2a6b1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025010655-pliable-affection-87eb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 8ec396d05d1b737c87311fb7311f753b02c2a6b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:06:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings
read-only

Patch series "mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings read-only".

In commit 158978945f31 ("mm: perform the mapping_map_writable() check after call_mmap()") (and preceding changes in the same series) it became possible to mmap() F_SEAL_WRITE sealed memfd mappings read-only.

Commit 5de195060b2e ("mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour") unintentionally undid this logic by moving the mapping_map_writable() check before the shmem_mmap() hook is invoked, thereby regressing this change.

This series reworks how we both permit write-sealed mappings being mapped read-only and disallow mprotect() from undoing the write-seal, fixing this regression.

We also add a regression test to ensure that we do not accidentally regress this in future.

Thanks to Julian Orth for reporting this regression.

This patch (of 2):

In commit 158978945f31 ("mm: perform the mapping_map_writable() check after call_mmap()") (and preceding changes in the same series) it became possible to mmap() F_SEAL_WRITE sealed memfd mappings read-only.

This was previously unnecessarily disallowed, despite the man page documentation indicating that it would be, thereby limiting the usefulness of F_SEAL_WRITE logic.

We fixed this by adapting logic that existed for the F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal (one which disallows future writes to the memfd) to also be used for F_SEAL_WRITE.

For background - the F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal clears VM_MAYWRITE for a read-only mapping to disallow mprotect() from overriding the seal - an operation performed by seal_check_write(), invoked from shmem_mmap(), the f_op->mmap() hook used by shmem mappings.

By extending this to F_SEAL_WRITE and critically - checking mapping_map_writable() to determine if we may map the memfd AFTER we invoke shmem_mmap() - the desired logic becomes possible. This is because mapping_map_writable() explicitly checks for VM_MAYWRITE, which we will have cleared.

Commit 5de195060b2e ("mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour") unintentionally undid this logic by moving the mapping_map_writable() check before the shmem_mmap() hook is invoked, thereby regressing this change.

We reinstate this functionality by moving the check out of shmem_mmap() and instead performing it in do_mmap() at the point at which VMA flags are being determined, which seems in any case to be a more appropriate place in which to make this determination.

In order to achieve this we rework memfd seal logic to allow us access to this information using existing logic and eliminate the clearing of VM_MAYWRITE from seal_check_write() which we are performing in do_mmap() instead.

include/linux/memfd.h +14 -0
index 3f2cf339ceaf..d437e3070850 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE
 extern long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned int arg);
 struct folio *memfd_alloc_folio(struct file *memfd, pgoff_t idx);
+unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file);
 #else
 static inline long memfd_fcntl(struct file *f, unsigned int c, unsigned int a)
 {
@@ -16,6 +17,19 @@ static inline struct folio *memfd_alloc_folio(struct file *memfd, pgoff_t idx)
 {
 	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 }
+
+static inline unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 #endif
 
+/* Retrieve memfd seals associated with the file, if any. */
+static inline unsigned int memfd_file_seals(struct file *file)
+{
+	unsigned int *sealsp = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file);
+
+	return sealsp ? *sealsp : 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* __LINUX_MEMFD_H */
include/linux/mm.h +39 -17

69 lines not on this page · raw message

mm/memfd.c +1 -1
index c17c3ea701a1..35a370d75c9a 100644
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
 	return error;
 }
 
-static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file)
+unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file)
 {
 	if (shmem_file(file))
 		return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
mm/mmap.c +4 -0
index d32b7e701058..16f8e8be01f8 100644
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <linux/ksm.h>
+#include <linux/memfd.h>
 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -368,6 +369,7 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 
 	if (file) {
 		struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+		unsigned int seals = memfd_file_seals(file);
 		unsigned long flags_mask;
 
 		if (!file_mmap_ok(file, inode, pgoff, len))
@@ -408,6 +410,8 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 			vm_flags |= VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE;
 			if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
 				vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE | VM_SHARED);
+			else if (is_readonly_sealed(seals, vm_flags))
+				vm_flags &= ~VM_MAYWRITE;
 			fallthrough;
 		case MAP_PRIVATE:
 			if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))