Documentation:gpu: fixed spelling mistake
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 Documentation:gpu: fixed spelling mistake
Fixed spelling mistake identified by codespell in the drm-uapi documentation
Signed-off-by Andres Urian Florez <[email protected]>
--- Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +1 -1
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ ENOSPC: EPERM/EACCES: Returned for an operation that is valid, but needs more privileges. E.g. root-only or much more common, DRM master-only operations return - this when called by unpriviledged clients. There's no clear + this when called by unprivileged clients. There's no clear difference between EACCES and EPERM. ENODEV:
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Jonathan Corbet
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Andres Urian Florez
Fixed spelling mistake identified by codespell in the drm-uapi documentation
Signed-off-by Andres Urian Florez <[email protected]>--- Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +0
-0
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst ENOSPC: · line 522
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +1
-1@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ ENOSPC: EPERM/EACCES: Returned for an operation that is valid, but needs more privileges. E.g. root-only or much more common, DRM master-only operations return - this when called by unpriviledged clients. There's no clear + this when called by unprivileged clients. There's no clear difference between EACCES and EPERM.
This is a fine patch, but it should really have been copied to the DRM maintainers; I think scripts/get_maintainer.pl should have told you that?
Thanks,
jon
Quoted 27 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 13 lines · Andres Urian Florez
Fixed spelling mistake identified by codespell in the drm-uapi documentation
Signed-off-by Andres Urian Florez <[email protected]>--- Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +0
-0Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst ENOSPC: · line 522
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +1
-1@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ ENOSPC: EPERM/EACCES: Returned for an operation that is valid, but needs more privileges. E.g. root-only or much more common, DRM master-only operations return - this when called by unpriviledged clients. There's no clear + this when called by unprivileged clients. There's no clear difference between EACCES and EPERM.This is a fine patch, but it should really have been copied to the DRM maintainers; I think
scripts/get_maintainer.plshould have told you that?
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks,
jon
Sorry, including missing maintainers.
Thanks,
Andres