Skip to contentSkip to conversation

docs: filesystems: removed repeated word

PATCH In review Nidhish Chauhan 2 participants 2 messages May 16, 2025 – May 22, 2025 Documentation

lore
Share & tools
lore

Nidhish Chauhan

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 docs: filesystems: removed repeated word

Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in filesystems directory.

Signed-off-by Nidhish Chauhan <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst +1 -1
index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
 
 Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
 be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
-transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
+transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
 basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
 
 Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0
reviewer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 13 lines · Nidhish Chauhan

Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in filesystems directory.

Signed-off-by Nidhish Chauhan <[email protected]>
---
  Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst +0 -0
index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644

Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst easily as on jbd2_journal_start(). · line 99

Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst +1 -1
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
 
  Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
  be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
-transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
+transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
  basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
 
  Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation

Please run get_maintainers.pl to get the correct list of recipients for this patch.

thanks,
-- Shuah