CVE-2022-30550 version range fix
Hello,
CVE-2022-30550 is documented in your database as affecting versions of dovecot up to 2.3.20.
However, according to
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-news/2022-July/000477.html, the fix for this issue is:
https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/7bad6a24%5E..a1022072.patch
And this commit is only in Dovecot 2.4.0, which means that versions 2.3.21, 2.3.21.1 are affected.
Here is some additional evidence based on the Git repository of Dovecot:
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $
So 2.3.21 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21.1 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $
So 2.3.21.1 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.4.0 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" 7bad6a24160e34bce8f10e73dbbf9e5fbbcd1904 auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but different mechanisms/username_filter
Which means that 2.4.0 has the fix.
Therefore, your entry for CVE-2022-30550 should be fixed to indicate that versions up to (excluding) 2.4.0 are affected.
Thanks for your great work on maintaining this database! It would be create to have a public issue tracker to report issues.
Thomas
Signature · 7 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): BY3PR09MB875642446D6D15414F985131ED98A@BY3PR09MB8756.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
Hello Benjamin,
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated, and thanks for taking into account the feedback. At the end of your e-mail, you said "For CPE related inquiries we request that you send them to [email protected]", does that mean that some of my requests should have been sent to [email protected] instead, and if so which ones?
Perhaps you are referring to my request:
Subject: Numerous issues in CVEs for the "sox" project
?
Could you clarify, so that I can make sure I send my requests to the right contact?
Thanks a lot this effort on maintaining the NVD!
Best regards,
Thomas
Quoted 55 lines · On Fri, 23 May 2025 16:53:39 +0000 nvd <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Afternoon,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We appreciate community input in order to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information as possible. After reviewing publicly available information we have made the appropriate modifications to the configuration to list version 2.4.0 as the fixed version. Please allow up to 24 hours for the changes to be reflected on the website and in the data feeds.
For CPE related inquiries we request that you send them to [email protected].
V/r,
Benjamin Wells
National Vulnerability Database Team
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [email protected]-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2025 12:18 PM
To: nvd <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: CVE-2022-30550 version range fixHello,
CVE-2022-30550 is documented in your database as affecting versions of dovecot up to 2.3.20.
However, according to
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-news/2022-July/000477.html, the fix for this issue is:https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/7bad6a24%5E..a1022072.patch
And this commit is only in Dovecot 2.4.0, which means that versions 2.3.21, 2.3.21.1 are affected.
Here is some additional evidence based on the Git repository of Dovecot:
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $So 2.3.21 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21.1 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $So 2.3.21.1 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.4.0 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" 7bad6a24160e34bce8f10e73dbbf9e5fbbcd1904 auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but different mechanisms/username_filterWhich means that 2.4.0 has the fix.
Therefore, your entry for CVE-2022-30550 should be fixed to indicate that versions up to (excluding) 2.4.0 are affected.
Thanks for your great work on maintaining this database! It would be create to have a public issue tracker to report issues.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com/
Signature · 7 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): PH0PR09MB8763C94ABBA656291F0FD84DED6AA@PH0PR09MB8763.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
Hello,
I'm still not clear what are CVE inquiries vs. CPE inquiries. My inquiry here was regarding a CVE, so to me it made sense to report it to you as the way to fix the issue was to fix a CVE report.
Could you clarify so that I can address any future report to the correct entity?
Thanks a lot for your support!
Thomas
Quoted 105 lines · On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 20:01:10 +0000 nvd <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Afternoon,
We have requested that you kindly direct your CPE inquiries to [email protected] in the future. Thank you for your previous email inquiries. We would like to confirm that we have received the same and will be addressing them as time and resources allow.
V/r,
Benjamin Wells
National Vulnerability Database Team
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [email protected]-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2025 8:23 AM
To: nvd <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CVE-2022-30550 version range fixHello Benjamin,
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated, and thanks for taking into account the feedback. At the end of your e-mail, you said "For CPE related inquiries we request that you send them to [email protected]", does that mean that some of my requests should have been sent to [email protected] instead, and if so which ones?
Perhaps you are referring to my request:
Subject: Numerous issues in CVEs for the "sox" project
?
Could you clarify, so that I can make sure I send my requests to the right contact?
Thanks a lot this effort on maintaining the NVD!
Best regards,
Thomas
Quoted 51 lines · On Fri, 23 May 2025 16:53:39 +0000 nvd <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Afternoon,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We appreciate community input in order to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information as possible. After reviewing publicly available information we have made the appropriate modifications to the configuration to list version 2.4.0 as the fixed version. Please allow up to 24 hours for the changes to be reflected on the website and in the data feeds.
For CPE related inquiries we request that you send them to [email protected].
V/r,
Benjamin Wells
National Vulnerability Database Team
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [email protected]-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2025 12:18 PM
To: nvd <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: CVE-2022-30550 version range fixHello,
CVE-2022-30550 is documented in your database as affecting versions of dovecot up to 2.3.20.
However, according to
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-news/2022-July/000477.html, the fix for this issue is:https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/7bad6a24%5E..a1022072.patch
And this commit is only in Dovecot 2.4.0, which means that versions 2.3.21, 2.3.21.1 are affected.
Here is some additional evidence based on the Git repository of Dovecot:
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $So 2.3.21 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.3.21.1 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" $So 2.3.21.1 doesn't have the fix.
$ git log --format=oneline 2.4.0 | grep "auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but" 7bad6a24160e34bce8f10e73dbbf9e5fbbcd1904 auth: Fix handling passdbs with identical driver/args but different mechanisms/username_filterWhich means that 2.4.0 has the fix.
Therefore, your entry for CVE-2022-30550 should be fixed to indicate that versions up to (excluding) 2.4.0 are affected.
Thanks for your great work on maintaining this database! It would be create to have a public issue tracker to report issues.
Quoted 10 lines
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://boot/
lin.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cnvd%40nist.gov%7Cf24def78fb57460b488c08dd9ab db7dc%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C0%7C0%7C638836861810040456% 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIl AiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=M7H0 VkI9xtExvankInTYrtxX4bVat%2FPe0AfogQMt2bg%3D&reserved=0--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com/
Signature · 7 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot