FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nvme: always punt polled uring_cmd end_io work to task_work" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 9ce6c9875f3e995be5fd720b65835291f8a609b1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025062012-veggie-grout-8f7e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 9ce6c9875f3e995be5fd720b65835291f8a609b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:37:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: always punt polled uring_cmd end_io work to task_work
Currently NVMe uring_cmd completions will complete locally, if they are polled. This is done because those completions are always invoked from task context. And while that is true, there's no guarantee that it's invoked under the right ring context, or even task. If someone does NVMe passthrough via multiple threads and with a limited number of poll queues, then ringA may find completions from ringB. For that case, completing the request may not be sound.
Always just punt the passthrough completions via task_work, which will redirect the completion, if needed.
drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c +7 -14
@@ -429,21 +429,14 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_uring_cmd_end_io(struct request *req, pdu->result =le64_to_cpu (nvme_req (req)->result.u64);/* -* For iopoll, complete it directly. Note that using the uring_cmd -* helper for this is safe only because we check blk_rq_is_poll(). -* As that returns false if we're NOT on a polled queue, then it's -* safe to use the polled completion helper. -* -* Otherwise, move the completion to task work. +* IOPOLL could potentially complete this request directly, but +* if multiple rings are polling on the same queue, then it's possible +* for one ring to find completions for another ring. Punting the +* completion via task_work will always direct it to the right +* location, rather than potentially complete requests for ringA +* under iopoll invocations from ringB. */ -if (blk_rq_is_poll (req)) { -if (pdu->bio) -blk_rq_unmap_user (pdu->bio); -io_uring_cmd_iopoll_done (ioucmd, pdu->result, pdu->status); - }else { -io_uring_cmd_do_in_task_lazy (ioucmd, nvme_uring_task_cb); - } - +io_uring_cmd_do_in_task_lazy (ioucmd, nvme_uring_task_cb);return RQ_END_IO_FREE ; }
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · On 6/20/25 9:10 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Quoted 8 lines
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkoutFETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x9ce6c9875f3e995be5fd720b65835291f8a609b1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025062012-veggie-grout-8f7e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Here's a 6.1-stable variant.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
From 6c4a3cec0e463c3bea91cf625bf4f0ffa21fe934 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:37:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: always punt polled uring_cmd end_io work to
task_work
Commit 9ce6c9875f3e995be5fd720b65835291f8a609b1 upstream.
Currently NVMe uring_cmd completions will complete locally, if they are polled. This is done because those completions are always invoked from task context. And while that is true, there's no guarantee that it's invoked under the right ring context, or even task. If someone does NVMe passthrough via multiple threads and with a limited number of poll queues, then ringA may find completions from ringB. For that case, completing the request may not be sound.
Always just punt the passthrough completions via task_work, which will redirect the completion, if needed.
--- drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c +7 -8
@@ -438,7 +438,6 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_uring_cmd_end_io(struct request *req, {struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd = req->end_io_data;struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu =nvme_uring_cmd_pdu (ioucmd); -void *cookie =READ_ONCE (ioucmd->cookie); req->bio = pdu->bio;if (nvme_req (req)->flags &NVME_REQ_CANCELLED ) {
@@ -451,14 +450,14 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_uring_cmd_end_io(struct request *req, pdu->u.result =le64_to_cpu (nvme_req (req)->result.u64);/* -* For iopoll, complete it directly. -* Otherwise, move the completion to task work. +* IOPOLL could potentially complete this request directly, but +* if multiple rings are polling on the same queue, then it's possible +* for one ring to find completions for another ring. Punting the +* completion via task_work will always direct it to the right +* location, rather than potentially complete requests for ringA +* under iopoll invocations from ringB. */ -if (cookie !=NULL &&blk_rq_is_poll (req)) -nvme_uring_task_cb (ioucmd,IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED ); -else -io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task (ioucmd, nvme_uring_task_cb); - +io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task (ioucmd, nvme_uring_task_cb);return RQ_END_IO_FREE ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.50.0
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 8 lines · On 6/20/25 9:10 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkoutFETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x9ce6c9875f3e995be5fd720b65835291f8a609b1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025062012-veggie-grout-8f7e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..Here's a 6.1-stable variant.
Now applied, thanks.
greg k-h