um: Add SMP support
Subsystems (5)
cover um: Add SMP support
From: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
This series adds initial symmetric multi-processing (SMP) support to UML. With this support, users can tell UML to start multiple virtual CPUs, each represented as a separate host thread.
In UML, kthreads and normal threads (when running in kernel mode) can be scheduled and executed simultaneously on different virtual CPUs. However, the userspace code of normal threads currently still runs within their respective single-threaded stubs.
So SMP within the kernel is supported. SMP across different guest processes is also supported. Currently, the limitation is that multi-threading within the same guest process does not yet support true SMP in userspace, as it would require converting the stub into a multi-threaded implementation, which is not covered in this series.
Extending the stub to support true SMP in userspace could be done later and requires careful design. It may be better to handle it in a follow-up series.
Here are some steps to try out SMP support in UML:
1. Build UML with CONFIG_SMP=y and, for example, CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8.
2. Launch a UML instance with, for example, 8 virtual CPUs.
$ ./linux mem=16G ncpus=8 seccomp=on init=/bin/sh ubd0=$your_rootfs_image
RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/[email protected]/
Tiwei Bie (9):
um: Stop tracking virtual CPUs via mm_cpumask()
um: Remove unused cpu_data and current_cpu_data macros
um: vdso: Implement __vdso_getcpu() via syscall
um: Preserve errno within signal handler
um: Turn signals_* into thread-local variables
um: Determine sleep based on need_resched()
um: Define timers on a per-CPU basis
um: Support directing IO signals to calling thread
um: Add initial SMP support
arch/um/Kconfig | 39 +++- arch/um/include/asm/Kbuild | 3 +- arch/um/include/asm/current.h | 5 +- arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h | 24 ++- arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h | 4 +- arch/um/include/asm/mmu.h | 10 + arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 11 - arch/um/include/asm/percpu.h | 20 ++ arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 + arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h | 8 +- arch/um/include/asm/smp.h | 23 +- arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 + arch/um/include/linux/smp-internal.h | 21 ++ arch/um/include/linux/time-internal.h | 3 + arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h | 2 + arch/um/include/shared/longjmp.h | 3 +- arch/um/include/shared/os.h | 15 +- arch/um/include/shared/skas/mm_id.h | 3 + arch/um/include/shared/smp.h | 19 ++ arch/um/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/um/kernel/irq.c | 35 +++- arch/um/kernel/ksyms.c | 2 +- arch/um/kernel/mem.c | 2 + arch/um/kernel/process.c | 20 +- arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c | 32 ++- arch/um/kernel/smp.c | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/um/kernel/time.c | 54 +++-- arch/um/kernel/tlb.c | 5 +- arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 2 +- arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 24 ++- arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile | 4 +- arch/um/os-Linux/file.c | 10 +- arch/um/os-Linux/main.c | 5 +- arch/um/os-Linux/process.c | 10 + arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c | 14 +- arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 9 + arch/um/os-Linux/smp.c | 86 ++++++++ arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c | 4 + arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 42 ++-- arch/x86/um/vdso/um_vdso.c | 18 +- 40 files changed, 769 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/percpu.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/linux/smp-internal.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/shared/smp.h create mode 100644 arch/um/kernel/smp.c create mode 100644 arch/um/os-Linux/smp.c
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 1/9 um: Stop tracking virtual CPUs via mm_cpumask()
From: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
In UML, each user address space is represented as a separate stub process on the host. Therefore, user address spaces do not require TLB management on UML virtual CPUs, and it's unnecessary to track which virtual CPUs they have executed on.
--- arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h +0 -11
@@ -13,20 +13,9 @@#include <asm/mm_hooks.h> #include <asm/mmu.h> -#define activate_mm activate_mm -static inline void activate_mm (struct mm_struct *old,struct mm_struct *new) -{ -} -static inline void switch_mm (struct mm_struct *prev,struct mm_struct *next,struct task_struct *tsk) { -unsigned cpu =smp_processor_id (); - -if (prev != next) { -cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu,mm_cpumask (prev)); -cpumask_set_cpu (cpu,mm_cpumask (next)); - } }#define init_new_context init_new_context
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 2/9 um: Remove unused cpu_data and current_cpu_data macros
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
These two macros have no users. Remove them.
--- arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h +0 -2
@@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ struct cpuinfo_um {extern struct cpuinfo_um boot_cpu_data; -#define cpu_data (cpu) boot_cpu_data -#define current_cpu_data boot_cpu_data#define cache_line_size () (boot_cpu_data.cache_alignment)#define KSTK_REG (tsk, reg) get_thread_reg(reg, &tsk->thread.switch_buf)
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 3/9 um: vdso: Implement __vdso_getcpu() via syscall
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
We are going to support SMP in UML, so we can not hard code the CPU and NUMA node in __vdso_getcpu() anymore.
--- arch/x86/um/vdso/um_vdso.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/x86/um/vdso/um_vdso.c +8 -10
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@int __vdso_clock_gettime (clockid_t clock,struct __kernel_old_timespec *ts);int __vdso_gettimeofday (struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv,struct timezone *tz);__kernel_old_time_t __vdso_time (__kernel_old_time_t *t); -long __vdso_getcpu (unsigned int *cpu,unsigned int *node,struct getcpu_cache *unused); +long __vdso_getcpu (unsigned int *cpu,unsigned int *node,struct getcpu_cache *tcache);int __vdso_clock_gettime (clockid_t clock,struct __kernel_old_timespec *ts) {
@@ -60,18 +60,16 @@ __kernel_old_time_t __vdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *t)__kernel_old_time_t time (__kernel_old_time_t *t) __attribute__((weak,alias ("__vdso_time" )));long -__vdso_getcpu (unsigned int *cpu,unsigned int *node,struct getcpu_cache *unused) +__vdso_getcpu (unsigned int *cpu,unsigned int *node,struct getcpu_cache *tcache) { -/* -* UML does not support SMP, we can cheat here. :) -*/ +long ret; -if (cpu) - *cpu =0 ; -if (node) - *node =0 ; + asmvolatile ("syscall" + :"=a" (ret) + :"0" (__NR_getcpu),"D" (cpu),"S" (node),"d" (tcache) + :"rcx" ,"r11" ,"memory" ); -return 0 ; +return ret; }long getcpu (unsigned int *cpu,unsigned int *node,struct getcpu_cache *tcache)
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 4/9 um: Preserve errno within signal handler
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
We rely on errno to determine if a syscall has failed. However, the current signal handler may modify errno. Preserve errno within the signal handler to ensure it remains async-signal safe.
--- arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c +3 -0
@@ -201,8 +201,11 @@ static void hard_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *p) {ucontext_t *uc = p;mcontext_t *mc = &uc->uc_mcontext; +int errno_saved = errno; (*handlers[sig])(sig, (struct siginfo *)si, mc); + + errno = errno_saved; }void set_handler (int sig)
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 5/9 um: Turn signals_* into thread-local variables
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
Turn signals_enabled, signals_pending and signals_active into thread-local variables. This enables us to control and track signals independently on each CPU thread. This is a preparation for adding SMP support.
--- arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h | 4 ++-- arch/um/include/shared/longjmp.h | 3 +-- arch/um/include/shared/os.h | 1 + arch/um/kernel/ksyms.c | 2 +- arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c | 11 ++++++++--- 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h +2 -2
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@#ifndef __UM_IRQFLAGS_H#define __UM_IRQFLAGS_H -extern int signals_enabled; +int um_get_signals (void );int um_set_signals (int enable);void block_signals (void );void unblock_signals (void );
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ void unblock_signals(void);#define arch_local_save_flags arch_local_save_flagsstatic inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags (void ) { -return signals_enabled; +return um_get_signals (); }#define arch_local_irq_restore arch_local_irq_restore
arch/um/include/shared/longjmp.h +1 -2
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@#include <sysdep/archsetjmp.h> #include <os.h> -extern int signals_enabled;extern int setjmp (jmp_buf );extern void longjmp (jmp_buf ,int );
@@ -15,7 +14,7 @@ extern void longjmp(jmp_buf, int);#define UML_SETJMP (buf) ({ \ int n, enable; \ - enable = *(volatile int *)&signals_enabled; \ + enable = um_get_signals(); \ n = setjmp(*buf); \ if(n != 0) \ um_set_signals_trace(enable); \
arch/um/include/shared/os.h +1 -0
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ extern void send_sigio_to_self(void);extern int change_sig (int signal,int on);extern void block_signals (void );extern void unblock_signals (void ); +extern int um_get_signals (void );extern int um_set_signals (int enable);extern int um_set_signals_trace (int enable);extern void deliver_alarm (void );
arch/um/kernel/ksyms.c +1 -1
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <os.h> +EXPORT_SYMBOL (um_get_signals);EXPORT_SYMBOL (um_set_signals); -EXPORT_SYMBOL (signals_enabled);EXPORT_SYMBOL (os_stat_fd);EXPORT_SYMBOL (os_stat_file);
arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c +8 -3
@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ static void sig_handler_common(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)#define SIGCHLD_BIT 2#define SIGCHLD_MASK (1 << SIGCHLD_BIT) -int signals_enabled; +static __threadint signals_enabled;#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT )static int signals_blocked, signals_blocked_pending;#endif -static unsigned int signals_pending; -static unsigned int signals_active =0 ; +static __threadunsigned int signals_pending; +static __threadunsigned int signals_active;static void sig_handler (int sig,struct siginfo *si,mcontext_t *mc) {
@@ -345,6 +345,11 @@ void unblock_signals(void) } } +int um_get_signals (void ) +{ +return signals_enabled; +} +int um_set_signals (int enable) {int ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 6/9 um: Determine sleep based on need_resched()
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
With SMP and NO_HZ enabled, the CPU may still need to sleep even if the timer is disarmed. Switch to deciding whether to sleep based on pending resched. This is a preparation for adding SMP support.
--- arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h | 1 + arch/um/kernel/process.c | 12 ++++++++++-- arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 11 +++++------ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ extern int __uml_cant_sleep(void);extern int get_current_pid (void );extern int copy_from_user_proc (void *to,void *from,int size);extern char *uml_strdup (const char *string); +int uml_need_resched (void );extern unsigned long to_irq_stack (unsigned long *mask_out);extern unsigned long from_irq_stack (int nested);
arch/um/kernel/process.c +10 -2
@@ -209,10 +209,13 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,void um_idle_sleep (void ) { -if (time_travel_mode !=TT_MODE_OFF ) +if (time_travel_mode !=TT_MODE_OFF ) {time_travel_sleep (); -else + }else { +raw_local_irq_enable ();os_idle_sleep (); +raw_local_irq_disable (); + } }void arch_cpu_idle (void )
@@ -225,6 +228,11 @@ int __uml_cant_sleep(void) {/* Is in_interrupt() really needed? */ } +int uml_need_resched (void ) +{ +return need_resched (); +} +extern exitcall_t __uml_exitcall_begin, __uml_exitcall_end;void do_uml_exitcalls (void )
arch/um/os-Linux/time.c +5 -6
@@ -98,18 +98,17 @@ long long os_nsecs(void)*/ void os_idle_sleep (void ) { -struct itimerspec its;sigset_t set, old; -/* block SIGALRM while we analyze the timer state */ +/* Block SIGALRM while performing the need_resched check. */ sigemptyset (&set);sigaddset (&set,SIGALRM );sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK , &set, &old); -/* check the timer, and if it'll fire then wait for it */ -timer_gettime (event_high_res_timer, &its); -if (its.it_value.tv_sec || its.it_value.tv_nsec) +/* Sleep if no resched is pending. */ +if (!uml_need_resched ())sigsuspend (&old); -/* either way, restore the signal mask */ + +/* Restore the signal mask. */ sigprocmask (SIG_UNBLOCK , &set,NULL ); }
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 7/9 um: Define timers on a per-CPU basis
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
Define timers on a per-CPU basis to enable each CPU to have its own timer. This is a preparation for adding SMP support.
--- arch/um/include/linux/time-internal.h | 3 ++ arch/um/include/shared/os.h | 6 +-- arch/um/kernel/irq.c | 2 +- arch/um/kernel/time.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-------- arch/um/os-Linux/main.c | 2 +- arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 28 +++++++++----- 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/linux/time-internal.h +3 -0
@@ -90,4 +90,7 @@ extern unsigned long tt_extra_sched_jiffies;* which is intentional since we really shouldn't link it in that case. */ void time_travel_ndelay (unsigned long nsec); + +int um_setup_timer (void ); +#endif /* __TIMER_INTERNAL_H__ */
arch/um/include/shared/os.h +3 -3
@@ -269,9 +269,9 @@ extern void os_warn(const char *fmt, ...)/* time.c */ extern void os_idle_sleep (void );extern int os_timer_create (void ); -extern int os_timer_set_interval (unsigned long long nsecs); -extern int os_timer_one_shot (unsigned long long nsecs); -extern void os_timer_disable (void ); +extern int os_timer_set_interval (int cpu,unsigned long long nsecs); +extern int os_timer_one_shot (int cpu,unsigned long long nsecs); +extern void os_timer_disable (int cpu);extern long long os_persistent_clock_emulation (void );extern long long os_nsecs (void );
arch/um/kernel/irq.c +1 -1
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void) {int i; -irq_set_chip_and_handler (TIMER_IRQ , &alarm_irq_type, handle_edge_irq); +irq_set_chip_and_handler (TIMER_IRQ , &alarm_irq_type, handle_percpu_irq);for (i =1 ; i <UM_LAST_SIGNAL_IRQ ; i++)irq_set_chip_and_handler (i, &normal_irq_type, handle_edge_irq);
arch/um/kernel/time.c +39 -15
160 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/um/os-Linux/main.c +1 -1
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int __init main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)*/ /* stop timers and set timer signal to be ignored */ -os_timer_disable (); +os_timer_disable (0 );/* disable SIGIO for the fds and set SIGIO to be ignored */ err =deactivate_all_fds ();
arch/um/os-Linux/time.c +19 -9
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@#include <os.h> #include <string.h> -static timer_t event_high_res_timer =0 ; +static timer_t event_high_res_timer[CONFIG_NR_CPUS ] = {0 };static inline long long timespec_to_ns (const struct timespec *ts) {
@@ -31,20 +31,30 @@ long long os_persistent_clock_emulation(void)return timespec_to_ns (&realtime_tp); } +#ifndef sigev_notify_thread_id +#define sigev_notify_thread_id _sigev_un._tid +#endif +/** * os_timer_create() - create an new posix (interval) timer */ int os_timer_create (void ) { -timer_t *t = &event_high_res_timer; +timer_t *t = &event_high_res_timer[0 ]; +struct sigevent sev = { + .sigev_notify =SIGEV_THREAD_ID , + .sigev_signo =SIGALRM , + .sigev_value.sival_ptr = t, + .sigev_notify_thread_id =gettid (), + }; -if (timer_create (CLOCK_MONOTONIC ,NULL , t) ==-1 ) +if (timer_create (CLOCK_MONOTONIC , &sev, t) ==-1 )return -1 ;return 0 ; } -int os_timer_set_interval (unsigned long long nsecs) +int os_timer_set_interval (int cpu,unsigned long long nsecs) {struct itimerspec its;
@@ -54,13 +64,13 @@ int os_timer_set_interval(unsigned long long nsecs) its.it_interval.tv_sec = nsecs /UM_NSEC_PER_SEC ; its.it_interval.tv_nsec = nsecs %UM_NSEC_PER_SEC ; -if (timer_settime (event_high_res_timer,0 , &its,NULL ) ==-1 ) +if (timer_settime (event_high_res_timer[cpu],0 , &its,NULL ) ==-1 )return -errno;return 0 ; } -int os_timer_one_shot (unsigned long long nsecs) +int os_timer_one_shot (int cpu,unsigned long long nsecs) {struct itimerspec its = { .it_value.tv_sec = nsecs /UM_NSEC_PER_SEC ,
@@ -70,19 +80,19 @@ int os_timer_one_shot(unsigned long long nsecs) .it_interval.tv_nsec = 0, // we cheat here }; -timer_settime (event_high_res_timer,0 , &its,NULL ); +timer_settime (event_high_res_timer[cpu],0 , &its,NULL );return 0 ; }/** * os_timer_disable() - disable the posix (interval) timer */ -void os_timer_disable (void ) +void os_timer_disable (int cpu) {struct itimerspec its;memset (&its,0 ,sizeof (struct itimerspec )); -timer_settime (event_high_res_timer,0 , &its,NULL ); +timer_settime (event_high_res_timer[cpu],0 , &its,NULL ); }long long os_nsecs (void )
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 8/9 um: Support directing IO signals to calling thread
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
Extend os_set_fd_async() to allow the calling thread to direct I/O availability signals to itself. After this change, existing users will explicitly direct these signals to the CPU0 thread, which was achieved by ignoring SIGIO in helper threads. This is a preparation for adding SMP support.
--- arch/um/include/shared/os.h | 2 +- arch/um/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++-- arch/um/os-Linux/file.c | 10 +++++++--- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/um/include/shared/os.h +1 -1
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ extern int os_pread_file(int fd, void *buf, int len, unsigned long long offset);extern int os_pwrite_file (int fd,const void *buf,int count,unsigned long long offset);extern int os_file_modtime (const char *file,long long *modtime);extern int os_pipe (int *fd,int stream,int close_on_exec); -extern int os_set_fd_async (int fd); +extern int os_set_fd_async (int fd,int self);extern int os_clear_fd_async (int fd);extern int os_set_fd_block (int fd,int blocking);extern int os_accept_connection (int fd);
arch/um/kernel/irq.c +2 -2
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int activate_fd(int irq, int fd, enum um_irq_type type, void *dev_id,int err, events =os_event_mask (type);unsigned long flags; - err =os_set_fd_async (fd); + err =os_set_fd_async (fd,0 );if (err <0 ) goto out;
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void um_irqs_resume(void)raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&irq_lock, flags);list_for_each_entry (entry, &active_fds, list) {if (entry->suspended) { -int err =os_set_fd_async (entry->fd); +int err =os_set_fd_async (entry->fd,0 );WARN (err <0 ,"os_set_fd_async returned %d\n" , err); entry->suspended = false;
arch/um/os-Linux/file.c +7 -3
@@ -391,8 +391,12 @@ int os_pipe(int *fds, int stream, int close_on_exec)return err; } -int os_set_fd_async (int fd) +int os_set_fd_async (int fd,int self) { +struct f_owner_ex owner = { + .type =F_OWNER_TID , + .pid = self ?gettid () :os_getpid (), + };int err, flags; flags =fcntl (fd,F_GETFL );
@@ -408,9 +412,9 @@ int os_set_fd_async(int fd) }if ((fcntl (fd,F_SETSIG ,SIGIO ) <0 ) || - (fcntl (fd,F_SETOWN ,os_getpid ()) <0 )) { + (fcntl (fd,F_SETOWN_EX , &owner) <0 )) { err = -errno; -printk (UM_KERN_ERR "os_set_fd_async : Failed to fcntl F_SETOWN " +printk (UM_KERN_ERR "os_set_fd_async : Failed to fcntl F_SETOWN_EX " "(or F_SETSIG) fd %d, errno = %d\n" , fd, errno);return err; }
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 9/9 um: Add initial SMP support
In reply to Tiwei BieFrom: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
Add initial symmetric multi-processing (SMP) support to UML. With this support, it is now possible for users to tell UML to start multiple virtual CPUs, each represented as a separate host thread.
In UML, kthreads and normal threads (when running in kernel mode) can be scheduled and executed simultaneously on different virtual CPUs. However, the userspace code of normal threads still runs within their single-threaded stubs, meaning that true SMP support in userspace is not yet realized within the same process.
--- arch/um/Kconfig | 39 +++- arch/um/include/asm/Kbuild | 3 +- arch/um/include/asm/current.h | 5 +- arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h | 24 ++- arch/um/include/asm/mmu.h | 10 + arch/um/include/asm/percpu.h | 20 ++ arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 + arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h | 6 + arch/um/include/asm/smp.h | 23 +- arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 + arch/um/include/linux/smp-internal.h | 21 ++ arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h | 1 + arch/um/include/shared/os.h | 6 + arch/um/include/shared/skas/mm_id.h | 3 + arch/um/include/shared/smp.h | 19 ++ arch/um/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/um/kernel/irq.c | 29 +++ arch/um/kernel/mem.c | 2 + arch/um/kernel/process.c | 8 +- arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c | 32 ++- arch/um/kernel/smp.c | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/um/kernel/tlb.c | 5 +- arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 2 +- arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 24 ++- arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile | 4 +- arch/um/os-Linux/main.c | 3 +- arch/um/os-Linux/process.c | 10 + arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 9 + arch/um/os-Linux/smp.c | 86 ++++++++ arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c | 4 + arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 7 +- 31 files changed, 655 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/percpu.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/linux/smp-internal.h create mode 100644 arch/um/include/shared/smp.h create mode 100644 arch/um/kernel/smp.c create mode 100644 arch/um/os-Linux/smp.c
arch/um/Kconfig +36 -3
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config UML select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS select ARCH_SUPPORTS_LTO_CLANG select ARCH_SUPPORTS_LTO_CLANG_THIN + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT select TTY # Needed for line.c select HAVE_ARCH_VMAP_STACK
@@ -79,10 +80,41 @@ config HZ int default 100 -config NR_CPUS +config SMP + bool "Symmetric multi-processing support" + default n + help + This option enables UML SMP support. + + With this enabled, it is possible for users to tell UML to start + multiple virtual processors. Each virtual processor is represented + as a separate host thread. + + In UML, kthreads and normal threads (when running in kernel mode) + can be scheduled and executed simultaneously on different virtual + processors. However, the userspace code of normal threads still + runs within their respective single-threaded stubs, meaning that + true SMP support in userspace is not yet realized within the same + process. + +config NR_CPUS_RANGE_BEGIN + int + default 1 if !SMP + default 2 + +config NR_CPUS_RANGE_END + int + default 256 + +config NR_CPUS_DEFAULT int - range 1 1 - default 1 + default 2 if SMP + default 1 if !SMP + +config NR_CPUS + int "Maximum number of CPUs" if SMP + range NR_CPUS_RANGE_BEGIN NR_CPUS_RANGE_END + default NR_CPUS_DEFAULT source "arch/$(HEADER_ARCH)/um/Kconfig"
@@ -258,6 +290,7 @@ source "arch/um/drivers/Kconfig" config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE def_bool y + depends on !SMP menu "Power management options"
arch/um/include/asm/Kbuild +2 -1
@@ -17,10 +17,11 @@ generic-y += module.h generic-y += module.lds.h generic-y += param.h generic-y += parport.h -generic-y += percpu.h generic-y += preempt.h +generic-y += qrwlock.h generic-y += runtime-const.h generic-y += softirq_stack.h +generic-y += spinlock_types.h generic-y += switch_to.h generic-y += topology.h generic-y += trace_clock.h
arch/um/include/asm/current.h +3 -2
@@ -7,15 +7,16 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ +#include <asm/smp.h> +struct task_struct ;extern struct task_struct *cpu_tasks[NR_CPUS ]; static __always_inline struct task_struct *get_current(void) { -return cpu_tasks[0 ]; +return cpu_tasks[raw_smp_processor_id ()]; } -#define current get_current()#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h +23 -1
@@ -2,8 +2,30 @@#ifndef __ASM_UM_HARDIRQ_H#define __ASM_UM_HARDIRQ_H -#include <asm-generic/hardirq.h> +#include <linux/cache.h> +#include <linux/threads.h> #define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED 1 +typedef struct { +unsigned int __softirq_pending; +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) +unsigned int irq_resched_count; +unsigned int irq_call_count; +#endif +}____cacheline_aligned irq_cpustat_t ; + +DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED (irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat); + +#define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT + +#define inc_irq_stat (member) this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.member) + +#include <linux/irq.h> + +static inline void ack_bad_irq (unsigned int irq) +{ +pr_crit ("unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n" , irq); +} +#endif /* __ASM_UM_HARDIRQ_H */
arch/um/include/asm/mmu.h +10 -0
@@ -7,16 +7,26 @@#define __ARCH_UM_MMU_H#include "linux/types.h" +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <mm_id.h> typedef struct mm_context {struct mm_id id; +struct mutex turnstile;struct list_head list;/* Address range in need of a TLB sync */ +spinlock_t sync_tlb_lock;unsigned long sync_tlb_range_from;unsigned long sync_tlb_range_to; }mm_context_t ; +#define INIT_MM_CONTEXT (mm) \ + .context = { \ + .turnstile = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mm.context.turnstile), \ + .sync_tlb_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(mm.context.sync_tlb_lock), \ + } +#endif
arch/um/include/asm/percpu.h new file +20 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_PERCPU_H +#define __ASM_UM_PERCPU_H + +#include <linux/threads.h> + +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +#define __per_cpu_offset __per_cpu_offset +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ +extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS ]; +#endif + +#define per_cpu_offset (x) (__per_cpu_offset[x]) + +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ + +#include <asm-generic/percpu.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_PERCPU_H */
arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h +2 -0
@@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ static inline void set_pte(pte_t *pteptr, pte_t pteval)static inline void um_tlb_mark_sync (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long start,unsigned long end) { +guard (spinlock_irqsave)(&mm->context.sync_tlb_lock); +if (!mm->context.sync_tlb_range_to) { mm->context.sync_tlb_range_from = start; mm->context.sync_tlb_range_to = end;
arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h +6 -0
@@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ struct cpuinfo_um {extern struct cpuinfo_um boot_cpu_data; +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) +extern struct cpuinfo_um uml_cpu_data[]; +#else +#define uml_cpu_data (&boot_cpu_data) +#endif +#define cache_line_size () (boot_cpu_data.cache_alignment)#define KSTK_REG (tsk, reg) get_thread_reg(reg, &tsk->thread.switch_buf)
arch/um/include/asm/smp.h +22 -1
@@ -2,6 +2,27 @@#ifndef __UM_SMP_H#define __UM_SMP_H -#define hard_smp_processor_id () 0 +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <asm/current.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <shared/smp.h> + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () uml_curr_cpu() + +void arch_smp_send_reschedule (int cpu); + +void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi (int cpu); + +void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (const struct cpumask *mask); + +static inline void smp_cpus_done (unsigned int maxcpus) { } + +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */ + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () 0 + +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ #endif
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H + +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */
arch/um/include/linux/smp-internal.h new file +21 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __UM_SMP_INTERNAL_H +#define __UM_SMP_INTERNAL_H + +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +int smp_sigio_handler (struct uml_pt_regs *regs); +void prefill_possible_map (void ); + +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */ + +static inline int smp_sigio_handler (struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +return 0 ; +} + +static inline void prefill_possible_map (void ) { } + +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ + +#endif /* __UM_SMP_INTERNAL_H */
arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h +1 -0
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct siginfo;extern int uml_exitcode;extern int kmalloc_ok; +extern int disable_kmalloc[];#define UML_ROUND_UP (addr) \ ((((unsigned long) addr) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK)
arch/um/include/shared/os.h +6 -0
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ extern int can_drop_memory(void);void os_set_pdeathsig (void ); +int os_futex_wake (void *uaddr,unsigned int val); +/* execvp.c */ extern int execvp_noalloc (char *buf,const char *file,char *const argv[]);/* helper.c */
@@ -339,4 +341,8 @@ extern void um_trace_signals_off(void);/* time-travel */ extern void deliver_time_travel_irqs (void ); +/* smp.c */ +int start_cpu_thread (int cpu); +void start_idle_thread_secondary (void *arg,jmp_buf *switch_buf); +#endif
arch/um/include/shared/skas/mm_id.h +3 -0
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ struct mm_id { int syscall_fd_map[STUB_MAX_FDS]; }; +void enter_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id); +void exit_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id); +void notify_mm_kill (int pid);#endif
arch/um/include/shared/smp.h new file +19 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __UM_SHARED_SMP_H +#define __UM_SHARED_SMP_H + +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +extern int uml_ncpus; + +int uml_curr_cpu (void ); +void uml_start_idle (void *opaque); + +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */ + +#define uml_ncpus 1 +#define uml_curr_cpu () 0 + +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ + +#endif /* __UM_SHARED_SMP_H */
arch/um/kernel/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPROF) += gprof_syms.o obj-$(CONFIG_OF) += dtb.o obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o USER_OBJS := config.o
arch/um/kernel/irq.c +29 -0
@@ -20,8 +20,12 @@#include <os.h> #include <irq_user.h> #include <irq_kern.h> +#include <linux/smp-internal.h> #include <linux/time-internal.h> +DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED (irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat); + +#define irq_stats (x) (&per_cpu(irq_stat, x))/* When epoll triggers we do not know why it did so * we can also have different IRQs for read and write.
@@ -205,6 +209,9 @@ static void _sigio_handler(struct uml_pt_regs *regs,if (!irqs_suspended)irq_do_pending_events (timetravel_handlers_only); +if (smp_sigio_handler (regs)) +return ; +while (1 ) {/* This is now lockless - epoll keeps back-referencesto the irqs * which have trigger it so there is no need to walk the irq
@@ -696,3 +703,25 @@ void sigchld_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *unused_si, {do_IRQ (SIGCHLD_IRQ , regs); } + +/* +* /proc/interrupts printing for arch specific interrupts +*/ +int arch_show_interrupts (struct seq_file *p,int prec) +{ +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) +int cpu; + +seq_printf (p,"%*s: " , prec,"RES" ); +for_each_online_cpu (cpu) +seq_printf (p,"%10u " ,irq_stats (cpu)->irq_resched_count); +seq_puts (p," Rescheduling interrupts\n" ); + +seq_printf (p,"%*s: " , prec,"CAL" ); +for_each_online_cpu (cpu) +seq_printf (p,"%10u " ,irq_stats (cpu)->irq_call_count); +seq_puts (p," Function call interrupts\n" ); +#endif + +return 0 ; +}
arch/um/kernel/mem.c +2 -0
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ pgd_t swapper_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD];/* Initialized at boot time, and readonly after that */ int kmalloc_ok =0 ; +int disable_kmalloc[NR_CPUS ] = {0 }; +/* Used during early boot */ static unsigned long brk_end;
arch/um/kernel/process.c +5 -3
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@#include <os.h> #include <skas.h> #include <registers.h> +#include <linux/smp-internal.h> #include <linux/time-internal.h> #include <linux/elfcore.h>
@@ -185,11 +186,12 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct * p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)void initial_thread_cb (void (*proc)(void *),void *arg) { -int save_kmalloc_ok = kmalloc_ok; +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); +int save_kmalloc = disable_kmalloc[cpu]; - kmalloc_ok =0 ; + disable_kmalloc[cpu] =1 ;initial_thread_cb_skas (proc, arg); - kmalloc_ok = save_kmalloc_ok; + disable_kmalloc[cpu] = save_kmalloc; } int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c +24 -8
@@ -23,12 +23,30 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct stub_data) == STUB_DATA_PAGES * UM_KERN_PAGE_SIZE);static spinlock_t mm_list_lock;static struct list_head mm_list; +void enter_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id) +{ + struct mm_context *ctx = container_of(mm_id, struct mm_context, id); + +mutex_lock (&ctx->turnstile); +} + +void exit_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id) +{ + struct mm_context *ctx = container_of(mm_id, struct mm_context, id); + +mutex_unlock (&ctx->turnstile); +} +int init_new_context (struct task_struct *task,struct mm_struct *mm) {struct mm_id *new_id = &mm->context.id;unsigned long stack =0 ;int ret = -ENOMEM ; +mutex_init (&mm->context.turnstile); + +spin_lock_init (&mm->context.sync_tlb_lock); + stack =__get_free_pages (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,ilog2 (STUB_DATA_PAGES ));if (stack ==0 ) goto out;
@@ -73,6 +91,9 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)return ; } + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &mm_list_lock) +list_del (&mm->context.list); +if (mmu->id.pid >0 ) {os_kill_ptraced_process (mmu->id.pid,1 ); mmu->id.pid =-1 ;
@@ -82,10 +103,6 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)os_close_file (mmu->id.sock);free_pages (mmu->id.stack,ilog2 (STUB_DATA_PAGES )); - -guard (spinlock_irqsave)(&mm_list_lock); - -list_del (&mm->context.list); }static irqreturn_t mm_sigchld_irq (int irq,void * dev)
@@ -110,12 +127,11 @@ static irqreturn_t mm_sigchld_irq(int irq, void* dev)/* Marks the MM as dead */ mm_context->id.pid =-1 ; -/* -* NOTE: If SMP is implemented, a futex_wake -* needs to be added here. -*/ stub_data = (void *)mm_context->id.stack; stub_data->futex =FUTEX_IN_KERN ; +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) +os_futex_wake (&stub_data->futex,1 ); +#endif /* * NOTE: Currently executing syscalls by
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +266 -0
266 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/um/kernel/tlb.c +4 -1
@@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int um_tlb_sync(struct mm_struct *mm) {pgd_t *pgd;struct vm_ops ops; -unsigned long addr = mm->context.sync_tlb_range_from, next; +unsigned long addr, next;int ret =0 ; +guard (spinlock_irqsave)(&mm->context.sync_tlb_lock); +if (mm->context.sync_tlb_range_to ==0 )return 0 ;
@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ int um_tlb_sync(struct mm_struct *mm) ops.unmap = unmap; } + addr = mm->context.sync_tlb_range_from; pgd =pgd_offset (mm, addr); do { next = pgd_addr_end(addr, mm->context.sync_tlb_range_to);
arch/um/kernel/trap.c +1 -1
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ unsigned long segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip, int is_user,if (!is_user && regs) current->thread.segv_regs = container_of(regs, struct pt_regs, regs); -if (!is_user && init_mm.context.sync_tlb_range_to) { +if (!is_user && address >= start_vm && address < end_vm) {/* * Kernel has pending updates from set_ptes that were not * flushed yet. Syncing them should fix the pagefault (if not
arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c +22 -2
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@#include <linux/kmsg_dump.h> #include <linux/suspend.h> #include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/smp-internal.h> #include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@#include <kern_util.h> #include <mem_user.h> #include <os.h> +#include <smp.h> #include "um_arch.h"
@@ -74,6 +76,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) {int i =0 ; +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + i = (struct cpuinfo_um *) v - uml_cpu_data; +if (!cpu_online (i)) +return 0 ; +#endif +seq_printf (m,"processor\t: %d\n" , i);seq_printf (m,"vendor_id\t: User Mode Linux\n" );seq_printf (m,"model name\t: UML\n" );
@@ -90,13 +98,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) loops_per_jiffy/(500000 /HZ ), (loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100); -return 0 ; }static void *c_start (struct seq_file *m,loff_t *pos) { -return *pos < nr_cpu_ids ? &boot_cpu_data + *pos :NULL ; +return *pos < nr_cpu_ids ? uml_cpu_data + *pos :NULL ; }static void *c_next (struct seq_file *m,void *v,loff_t *pos)
@@ -426,6 +433,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)strscpy (boot_command_line, command_line,COMMAND_LINE_SIZE ); *cmdline_p = command_line;setup_hostinfo (host_info,sizeof host_info); +prefill_possible_map ();if (os_getrandom (rng_seed,sizeof (rng_seed),0 ) ==sizeof (rng_seed)) {add_bootloader_randomness (rng_seed,sizeof (rng_seed));
@@ -460,6 +468,18 @@ void apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start, struct alt_instr *end) { } +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) +void alternatives_smp_module_add (struct module *mod,char *name, +void *locks,void *locks_end, +void *text,void *text_end) +{ +} + +void alternatives_smp_module_del (struct module *mod) +{ +} +#endif +void *text_poke (void *addr,const void *opcode,size_t len) {/*
arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile +3 -1
@@ -16,8 +16,10 @@ CFLAGS_main.o += -Wno-frame-larger-than obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REUSE_HOST_VSYSCALL_AREA) += elf_aux.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o + USER_OBJS := $(user-objs-y) elf_aux.o execvp.o file.o helper.o irq.o \ main.o mem.o process.o registers.o sigio.o signal.o start_up.o time.o \ - tty.o umid.o util.o + tty.o umid.o util.o smp.o include $(srctree)/arch/um/scripts/Makefile.rules
arch/um/os-Linux/main.c +2 -1
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#include <init.h> #include <kern_util.h> #include <os.h> +#include <smp.h> #include <um_malloc.h> #include "internal.h"
@@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ void *__wrap_malloc(int size) {void *ret; -if (!kmalloc_ok) +if (!kmalloc_ok || disable_kmalloc[uml_curr_cpu ()])return __real_malloc (size);else if (size <=UM_KERN_PAGE_SIZE )/* finding contiguous pages can be hard*/
arch/um/os-Linux/process.c +10 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <fcntl.h> +#include <linux/futex.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <sys/ptrace.h> #include <sys/prctl.h>
@@ -189,3 +190,12 @@ void os_set_pdeathsig(void) {prctl (PR_SET_PDEATHSIG ,SIGKILL ); } + +int os_futex_wake (void *uaddr,unsigned int val) +{ +int r; + +CATCH_EINTR (r =syscall (__NR_futex, uaddr,FUTEX_WAKE , val, +NULL ,NULL ,0 )); +return r <0 ? -errno : r; +}
arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c +9 -0
@@ -563,6 +563,13 @@ void userspace(struct uml_pt_regs *regs)while (1 ) {struct mm_id *mm_id =current_mm_id (); +/* +* At any given time, only one CPU thread can enter the +* turnstile to operate on the same stub process, including +* executing stub system calls (mmap and munmap). +*/ +enter_turnstile (mm_id); +/* * When we are in time-travel mode, userspace can theoretically * do a *lot* of work without being scheduled. The problem with
@@ -740,6 +747,8 @@ void userspace(struct uml_pt_regs *regs) } } +exit_turnstile (mm_id); +UPT_SYSCALL_NR (regs) =-1 ;/* Assume: It's not a syscall */ if (sig) {
arch/um/os-Linux/smp.c new file +86 -0
86 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c +4 -0
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@#include <asm/unistd.h> #include <init.h> #include <os.h> +#include <smp.h> #include <kern_util.h> #include <mem_user.h> #include <ptrace_user.h>
@@ -481,6 +482,9 @@ void __init os_early_checks(void)fatal ("SECCOMP userspace requested but not functional!\n" ); } +if (uml_ncpus >1 ) +fatal ("SMP is not supported with PTRACE userspace.\n" ); + using_seccomp =0 ;check_ptrace ();
arch/um/os-Linux/time.c +5 -2
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@#include <sys/time.h> #include <kern_util.h> #include <os.h> +#include <smp.h> #include <string.h> static timer_t event_high_res_timer[CONFIG_NR_CPUS ] = {0 };
@@ -40,7 +41,8 @@ long long os_persistent_clock_emulation(void)*/ int os_timer_create (void ) { -timer_t *t = &event_high_res_timer[0 ]; +int cpu =uml_curr_cpu (); +timer_t *t = &event_high_res_timer[cpu];struct sigevent sev = { .sigev_notify =SIGEV_THREAD_ID , .sigev_signo =SIGALRM ,
@@ -110,9 +112,10 @@ void os_idle_sleep(void) {sigset_t set, old; -/* Block SIGALRM while performing the need_resched check. */ +/* Block SIGALRM and SIGIO while performing the need_resched check. */ sigemptyset (&set);sigaddset (&set,SIGALRM ); +sigaddset (&set,SIGIO );sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK , &set, &old);/* Sleep if no resched is pending. */
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Johannes Berg
maintainerRe: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 17 lines · Tiwei Bie
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/smp.harch/um/include/asm/smp.h +10
-1@@ -2,6 +2,27 @@#ifndef __UM_SMP_H#define __UM_SMP_H -#define hard_smp_processor_id () 0 +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <asm/current.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <shared/smp.h> + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () uml_curr_cpu() + +void arch_smp_send_reschedule (int cpu);
arch/um/include/asm/smp.h line 24
Quoted 10 lines
arch/um/include/asm/smp.h +10
-0+ +void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi (int cpu); + +void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (const struct cpumask *mask); + +static inline void smp_cpus_done (unsigned int maxcpus) { } + +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */ + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () 0
This seems a bit odd to me, linux/smp.h also defines raw_smp_processor_id() to 0 the same way, unconditionally.
It almost seems to me we should define raw_smp_processor_id() only for SMP? But then also __smp_processor_id()? Maybe not?
linux-arch folks, do you have any comments?
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 11 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +8
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H + +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */
Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h
Quoted 2 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +2
-0+void enter_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id); +void exit_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id);
We could add __acquires(turnstile) and __releases(turnstile) or something, to have sparse check that it's locked/unlocked correctly, but not sure it's worth it.
Quoted 1 line
+int disable_kmalloc[NR_CPUS] = { 0 };
nit: you can remove the "0".
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h
Quoted 8 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +8
-0+int smp_sigio_handler (struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); + +IPI_handler (cpu, regs); +if (cpu !=0 ) +return 1 ; +return 0 ;
nit: "return cpu != 0;" perhaps
Quoted 5 lines
+__uml_setup("ncpus=",
uml_ncpus_setup,
+"ncpus=<# of desired CPUs>\n"+" This tells UML how many virtual processors to start. The maximum\n" +" number of supported virtual processors can be obtained by querying\n" +" the CONFIG_NR_CPUS option using --showconfig.\n\n"
I feel like probably this should at least for now be mutually exclusive with time-travel= parameters, at least if it's not 1? Or perhaps only with time-travel=ext?
The timer code is in another patch, will look at that also. I guess until then it's more of a gut feeling on "how would this work" :)
johannes
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 9 lines · Johannes Berg
arch/um/kernel/smp.c line 229
Quoted 8 lines
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +8
-0+int smp_sigio_handler (struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); + +IPI_handler (cpu, regs); +if (cpu !=0 ) +return 1 ; +return 0 ;nit: "return cpu != 0;" perhaps
return !!cpu;
Signature · 1 line
~Randy
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
In reply to Johannes BergQuoted 32 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 17 lines · Tiwei Bie
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/smp.harch/um/include/asm/smp.h +10
-1@@ -2,6 +2,27 @@#ifndef __UM_SMP_H#define __UM_SMP_H -#define hard_smp_processor_id () 0 +#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMP ) + +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <asm/current.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <shared/smp.h> + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () uml_curr_cpu() + +void arch_smp_send_reschedule (int cpu);arch/um/include/asm/smp.h line 24
Quoted 10 lines
arch/um/include/asm/smp.h +10
-0+ +void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi (int cpu); + +void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (const struct cpumask *mask); + +static inline void smp_cpus_done (unsigned int maxcpus) { } + +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */ + +#define raw_smp_processor_id () 0This seems a bit odd to me,
linux/smp.halso definesraw_smp_processor_id()to 0 the same way, unconditionally.
Quoted 2 lines
It almost seems to me we should define
raw_smp_processor_id()only for SMP? But then also__smp_processor_id()? Maybe not?
I think you're right. I should't define raw_smp_processor_id() for non-SMP.
Quoted 17 lines
linux-arch folks, do you have any comments?
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 11 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +8
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H + +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */ Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
I added this file to include asm/processor.h; otherwise, there would be a lot of compilation errors. Other architectures seem to do the same:
$ grep -r asm/processor.h arch/ | grep asm/spinlock.h arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/alpha/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/hexagon/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/loongarch/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h>
Quoted 7 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h
Quoted 3 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +2
-0+void enter_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id); +void exit_turnstile (struct mm_id *mm_id);We could add
__acquires(turnstile)and__releases(turnstile)or something, to have sparse check that it's locked/unlocked correctly, but not sure it's worth it.
Will do.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+int disable_kmalloc[NR_CPUS] = { 0 };
nit: you can remove the "0".
Will fix all the nits in the next version.
Quoted 19 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h
Quoted 9 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +8
-0+int smp_sigio_handler (struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); + +IPI_handler (cpu, regs); +if (cpu !=0 ) +return 1 ; +return 0 ;nit: "return cpu != 0;" perhaps
Quoted 5 lines
+__uml_setup("ncpus=",
uml_ncpus_setup,
+"ncpus=<# of desired CPUs>\n"+" This tells UML how many virtual processors to start. The maximum\n" +" number of supported virtual processors can be obtained by querying\n" +" the CONFIG_NR_CPUS option using --showconfig.\n\n"
Quoted 3 lines
I feel like probably this should at least for now be mutually exclusive with time-travel= parameters, at least if it's not 1? Or perhaps only with time-travel=ext?
Currently, the UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT option depends on !SMP:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/um/Kconfig?h=v6.16#n218
so they can't be enabled at the same time during build.
Quoted 3 lines
The timer code is in another patch, will look at that also. I guess until then it's more of a gut feeling on "how would this work" :)
Thanks for the review! :)
Regards,
Tiwei
Johannes Berg
maintainerRe: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 17 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.harch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_HQuoted 8 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 5 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +5
-0+ +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */ Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
I added this file to include
asm/processor.h; otherwise, there would be a lot of compilation errors. Other architectures seem to do the same:
Quoted 10 lines
$ grep -r asm/processor.h arch/ | grep asm/spinlock.h arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/alpha/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/hexagon/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/loongarch/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h>
Except for loongarch they all do something else too though. Feels to me um (and loongarch) really shouldn't need that file.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I feel like probably this should at least for now be mutually exclusive with time-travel= parameters, at least if it's not 1? Or perhaps only with time-travel=ext?
Currently, the
UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORToption depends on !SMP:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/um/Kconfig?h=v6.16#n218
so they can't be enabled at the same time during build.
Oops, sorry, missed that. Good. I didn't see anything particularly wrong in the time code, but I'm sure it won't work there :)
johannes
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 29 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 17 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.harch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_HQuoted 8 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 5 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +5
-0+ +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */ Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
I added this file to include
asm/processor.h; otherwise, there would be a lot of compilation errors. Other architectures seem to do the same:Quoted 10 lines
$ grep -r asm/processor.h arch/ | grep asm/spinlock.h arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/alpha/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/hexagon/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/loongarch/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h>
Quoted 2 lines
Except for loongarch they all do something else too though. Feels to me um (and loongarch) really shouldn't need that file.
Sorry for the confusion. My point is that since other architectures also do this, it seems common practice to include asm/processor.h in asm/spinlock.h when necessary.
The reason we need to include asm/processor.h in asm/spinlock.h on UML is because:
ticket_spin_lock() (which is an inline function indirectly provided by asm-generic/spinlock.h) relies on atomic_cond_read_acquire(), which is defined as smp_cond_load_acquire().
On UML, smp_cond_load_acquire() is provided by asm-generic/barrier.h, and it relies on smp_cond_load_relaxed(), which is also provided by asm-generic/barrier.h on UML. And smp_cond_load_relaxed() is a macro that relies on cpu_relax(), which is provided by asm/processor.h.
If we don't include asm/processor.h in asm/spinlock.h, ticket_spin_lock() will fail to build:
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h: In function ‘ticket_spin_lock’:./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:253:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_relax’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
253 | cpu_relax(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:270:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_cond_load_relaxed’
270 | _val = smp_cond_load_relaxed(ptr, cond_expr); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/atomic.h:28:40: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_cond_load_acquire’
28 | #define atomic_cond_read_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:49:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘atomic_cond_read_acquire’
49 | atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I can add a comment for it like this:
Regards,
Tiwei
Johannes Berg
maintainerRe: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 30 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 29 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 27 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.harch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_HQuoted 8 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 5 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +5
-0+ +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */ Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
I added this file to include
asm/processor.h; otherwise, there would be a lot of compilation errors. Other architectures seem to do the same:$ grep -r asm/processor.h arch/ | grep asm/spinlock.h arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/alpha/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/hexagon/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/loongarch/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h>
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Except for loongarch they all do something else too though. Feels to me um (and loongarch) really shouldn't need that file.
Sorry for the confusion. My point is that since other architectures also do this, it seems common practice to include
asm/processor.hinasm/spinlock.hwhen necessary.
Yeah, I understand.
Quoted 7 lines
The reason we need to include
asm/processor.hinasm/spinlock.hon UML is because:
ticket_spin_lock()(which is an inline function indirectly provided byasm-generic/spinlock.h) relies onatomic_cond_read_acquire(), which is defined assmp_cond_load_acquire().
Right, but that's not the architecture's "fault".
It seems to me that either spinlock.h should include asm/processor.h for it, or (at least, but I think less appropriate) asm-generic/spinlock.h should be doing this.
Quoted 4 lines
On UML,
smp_cond_load_acquire()is provided byasm-generic/barrier.h, and it relies onsmp_cond_load_relaxed(), which is also provided byasm-generic/barrier.hon UML. Andsmp_cond_load_relaxed()is a macro that relies oncpu_relax(), which is provided byasm/processor.h.
In general though, there ought to be some definition of which header file(s) is/are expected to provide smp_cond_load_acquire() and/or atomic_cond_read_acquire(). And that header file/those header files should be included by the files that use the functions/macros.
IOW, I think you've stumbled across an inconsistency in the generic files, and hence we should fix that, rather than having each architecture paper over it.
johannes
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 44 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 30 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 29 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 27 lines · Tiwei Bie
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+++
b/arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.harch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_HQuoted 8 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h line 8
Quoted 5 lines
arch/um/include/asm/spinlock.h new file +5
-0+ +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_UM_SPINLOCK_H */ Do we need this file? Maybe asm-generic should be including the right things it needs?
I added this file to include
asm/processor.h; otherwise, there would be a lot of compilation errors. Other architectures seem to do the same:$ grep -r asm/processor.h arch/ | grep asm/spinlock.h arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/alpha/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/hexagon/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h> arch/loongarch/include/asm/spinlock.h:#include <asm/processor.h>Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Except for loongarch they all do something else too though. Feels to me um (and loongarch) really shouldn't need that file.
Sorry for the confusion. My point is that since other architectures also do this, it seems common practice to include
asm/processor.hinasm/spinlock.hwhen necessary.Yeah, I understand.
Quoted 4 lines
The reason we need to include
asm/processor.hinasm/spinlock.hon UML is because:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
ticket_spin_lock()(which is an inline function indirectly provided byasm-generic/spinlock.h) relies onatomic_cond_read_acquire(), which is defined assmp_cond_load_acquire().Right, but that's not the architecture's "fault".
It seems to me that either
spinlock.hshould includeasm/processor.hfor it,
+1
Quoted 14 lines
or (at least, but I think less appropriate)
asm-generic/spinlock.hshould be doing this.Quoted 4 lines
On UML,
smp_cond_load_acquire()is provided byasm-generic/barrier.h, and it relies onsmp_cond_load_relaxed(), which is also provided byasm-generic/barrier.hon UML. Andsmp_cond_load_relaxed()is a macro that relies oncpu_relax(), which is provided byasm/processor.h.In general though, there ought to be some definition of which header file(s) is/are expected to provide
smp_cond_load_acquire()and/oratomic_cond_read_acquire(). And that header file/those header files should be included by the files that use the functions/macros.
Quoted 3 lines
IOW, I think you've stumbled across an inconsistency in the generic files, and hence we should fix that, rather than having each architecture paper over it.
That does make sense. I will prepare a patch for that. Thanks!
Regards,
Tiwei
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 1 line · Tiwei Bie
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 17:37:24 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
IOW, I think you've stumbled across an inconsistency in the generic files, and hence we should fix that, rather than having each architecture paper over it.
That does make sense. I will prepare a patch for that. Thanks!
Hmm, this issue might be a bit tricky to resolve.. The root cause is that smp_cond_load_relaxed() provided by asm/barrier.h relies on cpu_relax() [1][2], but the corresponding header isn't included. The reason why it's not included might be that asm/processor.h includes too many dependencies, which prevents barrier.h from including it. I haven't come up with an ideal way to address it yet. Fortunately, smp_cond_load_relaxed() is a macro, so cpu_relax() is needed only when smp_cond_load_relaxed() is invoked inside a function (i.e., when it's expanded during preprocessing).
As for this series, I realized that I should implement spinlock in $SUBARCH (i.e., in a $SUBARCH native way, which won't require the above workaround anymore), similar to how atomic and barrier are implemented. I'll take that approach in the next version.
Thanks again for the review!
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/asm-generic/barrier.h?h=v6.16#n253
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/um/asm/barrier.h?h=v6.16#n27
Regards,
Tiwei
Johannes Berg
maintainerRe: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
In reply to Tiwei BieQuoted 4 lines · Tiwei Bie
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +3
-0+static void IPI_handler (int cpu,struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +struct pt_regs *old_regs =set_irq_regs ((struct pt_regs *)regs);
arch/um/kernel/smp.c line 189
Quoted 10 lines
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +10
-0+unsigned char c; +int fd; + +irq_enter (); + +if (current->mm) +os_alarm_process (current->mm->context.id.pid); + + fd = uml_cpu_data[cpu].ipi_pipe[0 ]; +while (os_read_file (fd, &c,1 ) ==1 ) {
We were discussing the IPI stuff and started thinking maybe an RT signal with sigqueue() passing the value to the si_value in SA_SIGINFO data would be possible and have less overhead? That way there's nothing on the SIGIO path, and you don't need a read() for the type of IPI?
johannes
Re: [PATCH 9/9] um: Add initial SMP support
Quoted 12 lines · Johannes Berg
Quoted 11 lines · Tiwei Bie
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +10
-0+static void IPI_handler (int cpu,struct uml_pt_regs *regs) +{ +struct pt_regs *old_regs =set_irq_regs ((struct pt_regs *)regs); +unsigned char c; +int fd; + +irq_enter (); + +if (current->mm) +os_alarm_process (current->mm->context.id.pid);
Quoted 8 lines
arch/um/kernel/smp.c line 189
Quoted 3 lines
arch/um/kernel/smp.c new file +3
-0+ + fd = uml_cpu_data[cpu].ipi_pipe[0 ]; +while (os_read_file (fd, &c,1 ) ==1 ) {We were discussing the IPI stuff and started thinking maybe an RT signal with
sigqueue()passing the value to thesi_valueinSA_SIGINFOdata would be possible and have less overhead? That way there's nothing on the SIGIO path, and you don't need aread()for the type of IPI?
I like this idea. I will give it a try. Thanks!
Regards,
Tiwei