Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Fix and rework of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

PATCH Superseded Dawei Li 3 participants 10 messages Nov 13, 2025 – Nov 14, 2025

Subsystems (2)

v3 of 4 Superseded Latest is v4 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Dawei Li

author
#0 lore raw

v3 cover Fix and rework of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

Hi,

This series fixes bug introduced by anonymous inode eptdev code and rework the exception handing paths.

And it tries to address a long suffering issue which may be backported to stable kernels.

Change for v3:
- Split it into 3 patches:
1/3: Fix legacy bug.
2/3: Fix new bug introduced by anonymous eptdev code. 3/3: Rework error handling code.
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Change for v2:
- Add put_device() when __rpmsg_eptdev_open() failed. Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Dawei Li (3):
rpmsg: char: Remove put_device() in rpmsg_eptdev_add()
rpmsg: char: Fix UAF and memory leak in
rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create()
rpmsg: char: Rework exception handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/3 rpmsg: char: Remove put_device() in rpmsg_eptdev_add()

put_device() is called on error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() to cleanup resource attached to eptdev->dev, unfortunately it's bogus cause dev->release() is not set yet.

When a struct device instance is destroyed, driver core framework checks the possible release() callback from candidates below:
- struct device::release()
- dev->type->release()
- dev->class->dev_release()

Rpmsg eptdev owns none of them so WARN() will complaint the absence of release():

[  159.112182] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  159.112188] Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst.
[  159.112205] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1975 at drivers/base/core.c:2567 device_release+0x7a/0x90
Fixes c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -1
index 34b35ea74aab..1b8297b373f0 100644
@@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 	if (cdev)
 		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
 free_eptdev:
-	put_device(dev);
 	kfree(eptdev);
 
 	return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#5 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/3 rpmsg: char: Fix UAF and memory leak in rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create()

In reply to Dawei Li

Potential UAF and memory leak exsit in exception handling paths for rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(), fix them.

- If rpmsg_add_eptdev() failes, eptdev is freed in it. Subsequent call of dev_err(&eptdev->device) triggers a UAF.
- If __rpmsg_eptdev_open() fails, eptdev is supposed to be freed by put_device().

Fixes 2410558f5f11 ("rpmsg: char: Implement eptdev based on anonymous inode")
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +3 -1
index 1b8297b373f0..0919ad0a19df 100644
@@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 	if (cdev)
 		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
 free_eptdev:
+	dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
 	kfree(eptdev);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -544,7 +545,6 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	ret =  rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, false);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	if (!ret)
 		*pfd = fd;
+	else
+		put_device(&eptdev->dev);
 
 	return ret;
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#7 lore raw

PATCH v3 3/3 rpmsg: char: Rework exception handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Dawei Li

Rework error handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and its callers, following rule of "release resource where it's allocated".

Fixes 2410558f5f11 ("rpmsg: char: Implement eptdev based on anonymous inode")
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +33 -27
index 0919ad0a19df..92c176e9b0e4 100644
@@ -460,44 +460,34 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 
 	eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
 
-	if (cdev) {
-		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto free_eptdev;
-
-		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
-	}
-
 	/* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
 	ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto free_minor_ida;
+		return ret;
 	dev->id = ret;
 	dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
 
-	ret = 0;
-
 	if (cdev) {
+		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
+
 		ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_ept_ida;
+		if (ret) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
+			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
 	dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
 
-	return ret;
-
-free_ept_ida:
-	ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
-free_minor_ida:
-	if (cdev)
-		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
-free_eptdev:
-	dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
-	kfree(eptdev);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
@@ -509,12 +499,17 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
 			       struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
 {
 	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
+	int ret;
 
 	eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent);
 	if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
 		return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
 
@@ -545,6 +540,12 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	ret =  rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, false);
 	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
+		/*
+		 * Avoid put_device() or WARN() will be triggered due to absence of
+		 * device::release(), refer to device_release().
+		 */
+		kfree(eptdev);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
 	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
 	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
 	struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
+	int ret;
 
 	memcpy(chinfo.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
 	chinfo.src = rpdev->src;
@@ -590,7 +592,11 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
 	 */
 	eptdev->default_ept->priv = eptdev;
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rpmsg: char: Remove put_device() in rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Dawei Li
Quoted 4 lines · Dawei Li

put_device() is called on error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() to cleanup resource attached to eptdev->dev, unfortunately it's bogus cause dev->release() is not set yet.

Quoted 8 lines

When a struct device instance is destroyed, driver core framework checks the possible release() callback from candidates below:
- struct device::release()
- dev->type->release()
- dev->class->dev_release()

Rpmsg eptdev owns none of them so WARN() will complaint the absence of release():

Hi Dawei,

Quoted 5 lines
[  159.112182] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  159.112188] Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst.
[  159.112205] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1975 at drivers/base/core.c:2567 device_release+0x7a/0x90

Although my local checkpatch.pl didn’t complain about this log line exceeding 75 characters, could we simplify it or just provide a summary instead?

Quoted 12 lines
Fixes c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
---
  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
index 34b35ea74aab..1b8297b373f0 100644

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, · line 497

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -1
@@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
  	if (cdev)
  		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
  free_eptdev:
-	put_device(dev);

Yes, remove put_device can solve the warning issue, however it would introduce one memleak issue of kobj->name.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c#n381

dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret); is already called, it depends on put_device to free memory, right?

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
  	kfree(eptdev);
 
  	return ret;
Signature · 2 lines
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rpmsg: char: Rework exception handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Dawei Li
Quoted 96 lines · Dawei Li

Rework error handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and its callers, following rule of "release resource where it's allocated".

Fixes 2410558f5f11 ("rpmsg: char: Implement eptdev based on anonymous inode")
---
  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +21 -26
index 0919ad0a19df..92c176e9b0e4 100644
@@ -460,44 +460,34 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 
  	eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
 
-	if (cdev) {
-		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto free_eptdev;
-
-		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
-	}
-
  	/* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
  	ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (ret < 0)
-		goto free_minor_ida;
+		return ret;
  	dev->id = ret;
  	dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
 
-	ret = 0;
-
  	if (cdev) {
+		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
+
  		ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_ept_ida;
+		if (ret) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
+			return ret;
+		}
  	}
 
  	/* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
  	dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
 
-	return ret;
-
-free_ept_ida:
-	ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
-free_minor_ida:
-	if (cdev)
-		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
-free_eptdev:
-	dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
-	kfree(eptdev);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
  }
 
  static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
@@ -509,12 +499,17 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
  			       struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
  {
  	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
+	int ret;
 
  	eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent);
  	if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
  		return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);
+
+	return ret;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
 

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par · line 546

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +4 -0
@@ -545,6 +540,12 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
  	ret =  rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, false);
  	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
+		/*
+		 * Avoid put_device() or WARN() will be triggered due to absence of
+		 * device::release(), refer to device_release().

Hi Dawei,

As I mentioned about the potential memory leak issue in patch 1/3, we could consider still using put_device for management, as this better aligns with the driver model standards and avoids potential issue. However, this requires assigning the release function in advance and also handling the special case where ida allocation fails in rpmsg_eptdev_add (removing the manual ida release).

Quoted 26 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +8 -1
+		 */
+		kfree(eptdev);
  		return ret;
  	}
 
@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
  	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
  	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
  	struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
+	int ret;
 
  	memcpy(chinfo.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
  	chinfo.src = rpdev->src;
@@ -590,7 +592,11 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
  	 */
  	eptdev->default_ept->priv = eptdev;
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);
+
+	return ret;
  }
 
  static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
Signature · 2 lines
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rpmsg: char: Remove put_device() in rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Zhongqiu Han
Quoted 51 lines · Zhongqiu Han
Quoted 4 lines · Dawei Li

put_device() is called on error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() to cleanup resource attached to eptdev->dev, unfortunately it's bogus cause dev->release() is not set yet.

Quoted 8 lines

When a struct device instance is destroyed, driver core framework checks the possible release() callback from candidates below:
- struct device::release()
- dev->type->release()
- dev->class->dev_release()

Rpmsg eptdev owns none of them so WARN() will complaint the absence of release():

Hi Dawei,

Quoted 5 lines

[  159.112182] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  159.112188] Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst. [  159.112205] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1975 at drivers/base/core.c:2567 device_release+0x7a/0x90

Although my local checkpatch.pl didn’t complain about this log line exceeding 75 characters, could we simplify it or just provide a summary instead?

Quoted 15 lines
Fixes c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")

---
  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 1 -

  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
index 34b35ea74aab..1b8297b373f0 100644
@@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev 
 *eptdev,
       if (cdev)
           ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
Quoted 2 lines

  free_eptdev:
-    put_device(dev);

Yes, remove put_device can solve the warning issue, however it would introduce one memleak issue of kobj->name.

Quoted 2 lines

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/ tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c#n381

The above link I arised was wrong; it’s now updated to the correct one.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c?h=for-next#n476

Quoted 8 lines

dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret); is already called, it depends on put_device to free memory, right?

Quoted 2 lines

      kfree(eptdev);
      return ret;

Signature · 2 lines
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
author
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rpmsg: char: Remove put_device() in rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Zhongqiu Han

Hi,

Thanks for the review.

Quoted 52 lines · Zhongqiu Han
Quoted 4 lines · Dawei Li

put_device() is called on error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() to cleanup resource attached to eptdev->dev, unfortunately it's bogus cause dev->release() is not set yet.

Quoted 8 lines

When a struct device instance is destroyed, driver core framework checks the possible release() callback from candidates below:
- struct device::release()
- dev->type->release()
- dev->class->dev_release()

Rpmsg eptdev owns none of them so WARN() will complaint the absence of release():

Hi Dawei,

Quoted 5 lines
[  159.112182] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  159.112188] Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst.
[  159.112205] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1975 at drivers/base/core.c:2567 device_release+0x7a/0x90

Although my local checkpatch.pl didn’t complain about this log line exceeding 75 characters, could we simplify it or just provide a summary instead?

Quoted 12 lines
Fixes c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
---
  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
index 34b35ea74aab..1b8297b373f0 100644

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, · line 497

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -1
@@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
  	if (cdev)
  		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
  free_eptdev:
-	put_device(dev);

Yes, remove put_device can solve the warning issue, however it would introduce one memleak issue of kobj->name.

Quoted 5 lines

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c#n381

dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret); is already called, it depends on put_device to free memory, right?

Good catch.

If it's just device name being leaked, just postpone dev_set_name till every resource was allocated successfully.

[Copying your comment on patch3/3]

Quoted 6 lines

As I mentioned about the potential memory leak issue in patch 1/3, we could consider still using put_device for management, as this better aligns with the driver model standards and avoids potential issue. However, this requires assigning the release function in advance and also handling the special case where ida allocation fails in rpmsg_eptdev_add (removing the manual ida release).

But I agree with you, every data structure embedding struct device should bind its life cycle management to struct devcice, that's what driver core is designed. But it's bit tricky to implement your proposed approach, especially considering backing port to stable kernel. A possible solution could be:

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +11 -13
index 34b35ea74aab..e223a5452a75 100644
@@ -408,8 +408,13 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
 
-       ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
-       if (eptdev->dev.devt)
+       /*
+        * release() can be invoked from error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add(),
+        * WARN() will be fired if ida_free() is feed with invaid ID.
+        */
+       if (likely(ida_exists(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id)))
+               ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+       if (eptdev->dev.devt && likely(ida_exists(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt))))
                ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt));
        kfree(eptdev);
 }
@@ -458,6 +463,8 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
        struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
        int ret;
 
+       dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
+
        eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
 
        if (cdev) {
@@ -471,7 +478,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
        /* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
        ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (ret < 0)
-               goto free_minor_ida;
+               goto free_eptdev;
        dev->id = ret;
        dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
 
@@ -480,22 +487,13 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
        if (cdev) {
                ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
                if (ret)
-                       goto free_ept_ida;
+                       goto free_eptdev;
        }
 
-       /* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
-       dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
-
        return ret;
 
-free_ept_ida:
-       ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
-free_minor_ida:
-       if (cdev)
-               ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
 free_eptdev:
        put_device(dev);
-       kfree(eptdev);
 
        return ret;
 }

ida_exists() is introduced in 7fe6b987166b9, which is beyond the coverage of every stable kernel, and the commit this patch is fixing (c0cdc19f84a4) is contained in almost every stable kernel maintained.

Thanks,

Dawei

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
  	kfree(eptdev);
  	return ret;
Signature · 2 lines
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] rpmsg: char: Fix UAF and memory leak in rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create()

In reply to Dawei Li
Quoted 29 lines · Dawei Li

Potential UAF and memory leak exsit in exception handling paths for rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(), fix them.

- If rpmsg_add_eptdev() failes, eptdev is freed in it. Subsequent call of dev_err(&eptdev->device) triggers a UAF.
- If __rpmsg_eptdev_open() fails, eptdev is supposed to be freed by put_device().

Fixes 2410558f5f11 ("rpmsg: char: Implement eptdev based on anonymous inode")
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +1 -0
index 1b8297b373f0..0919ad0a19df 100644
@@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 	if (cdev)
 		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
 free_eptdev:
+	dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
 	kfree(eptdev);
 
 	return ret;

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par · line 547

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -1
@@ -544,7 +545,6 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	ret =  rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, false);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);

This doesn't neet to be done if kfree(eptdev) is moved out of rpmsg_eptdev_add().

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par · line 564

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +2 -0
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	if (!ret)
 		*pfd = fd;
+	else
+		put_device(&eptdev->dev);

This goes in the previous patch.

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +0 -0
 	return ret;
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
maintainer
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rpmsg: char: Rework exception handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add()

In reply to Dawei Li
Quoted 80 lines · Dawei Li

Rework error handling of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and its callers, following rule of "release resource where it's allocated".

Fixes 2410558f5f11 ("rpmsg: char: Implement eptdev based on anonymous inode")
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +15 -25
index 0919ad0a19df..92c176e9b0e4 100644
@@ -460,44 +460,34 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
 
 	eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
 
-	if (cdev) {
-		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto free_eptdev;
-
-		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
-	}
-
 	/* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
 	ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto free_minor_ida;
+		return ret;
 	dev->id = ret;
 	dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
 
-	ret = 0;
-
 	if (cdev) {
+		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
+
 		ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_ept_ida;
+		if (ret) {
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
+			ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
+			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
 	dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
 
-	return ret;
-
-free_ept_ida:
-	ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
-free_minor_ida:
-	if (cdev)
-		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
-free_eptdev:
-	dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
-	kfree(eptdev);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
@@ -509,12 +499,17 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
 			       struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
 {
 	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent · line 510

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +4 -1
+	int ret;
 
 	eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent);
 	if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
 		return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);

Previous patch.

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +2 -0
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
 

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par · line 548

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +6 -0
@@ -545,6 +540,12 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
 
 	ret =  rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, false);
 	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&eptdev->dev, "failed to add %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
+		/*
+		 * Avoid put_device() or WARN() will be triggered due to absence of
+		 * device::release(), refer to device_release().
+		 */
+		kfree(eptdev);

Previous patch.

Quoted 12 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +1 -0
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
 	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
 	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
 	struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
+	int ret;
 
 	memcpy(chinfo.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
 	chinfo.src = rpdev->src;

drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev) · line 597

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +3 -1
@@ -590,7 +592,11 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
 	 */
 	eptdev->default_ept->priv = eptdev;
 
-	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
+	if (ret)
+		kfree(eptdev);

Previous patch.

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c +2 -0
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1