FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ee5a977b4e771cc181f39d504426dbd31ed701cc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025122958-ambitious-prenatal-99c2@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From ee5a977b4e771cc181f39d504426dbd31ed701cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedor Pchelkin <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 19:04:28 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()

strscpy_pad() can't be used to copy a non-NUL-term string into a NUL-term string of possibly bigger size. Commit 0efc5990bca5 ("string.h: Introduce memtostr() and memtostr_pad()") provides additional information in that regard. So if this happens, the following warning is observed:

strnlen: detected buffer overflow: 65 byte read of buffer size 64

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28655 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28655 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.12.54-syzkaller-00144-g5f0270f1ba00 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __fortify_panic+0x1f/0x30 lib/string_helpers.c:1039
 strnlen include/linux/fortify-string.h:235 [inline]
 sized_strscpy include/linux/fortify-string.h:309 [inline]
 parse_apply_sb_mount_options fs/ext4/super.c:2504 [inline]
 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5261 [inline]
 ext4_fill_super+0x3c35/0xad00 fs/ext4/super.c:5706
 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x387/0x620 fs/super.c:1636
 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x380 fs/super.c:1814
 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3553 [inline]
 path_mount+0x6ae/0x1f70 fs/namespace.c:3880
 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3893 [inline]
 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4103 [inline]
 __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4080 [inline]
 __x64_sys_mount+0x280/0x300 fs/namespace.c:4080
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x64/0x140 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Since userspace is expected to provide s_mount_opts field to be at most 63 characters long with the ending byte being NUL-term, use a 64-byte buffer which matches the size of s_mount_opts, so that strscpy_pad() does its job properly. Return with error if the user still managed to provide a non-NUL-term string here.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

index 7de15249e826..d1ba894c0e0a 100644
@@ -2476,7 +2476,7 @@ static int parse_apply_sb_mount_options(struct super_block *sb,
 					struct ext4_fs_context *m_ctx)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
-	char s_mount_opts[65];
+	char s_mount_opts[64];
 	struct ext4_fs_context *s_ctx = NULL;
 	struct fs_context *fc = NULL;
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;

@@ -2484,7 +2484,8 @@ static int parse_apply_sb_mount_options(struct super_block *sb,
 	if (!sbi->s_es->s_mount_opts[0])
 		return 0;
 
-	strscpy_pad(s_mount_opts, sbi->s_es->s_mount_opts);
+	if (strscpy_pad(s_mount_opts, sbi->s_es->s_mount_opts) < 0)
+		return -E2BIG;
 
 	fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fs_context), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fc)