Patch "cpufreq: scmi: correct SCMI explanation" has been added to the 6.19-stable tree
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 39 lines · Sasha Levin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: scmi: correct SCMI explanation
to the 6.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summaryThe filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-scmi-correct-scmi-explanation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.19 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
commit
a7baeb022942223236bd64365d5045e9c5608f2fAuthor: Sergey Shtylyov <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jan 13 22:33:30 2026 +0300cpufreq: scmi: correct SCMI explanation
[ Upstream commit
8c376f337a7e31c42949247e24eaad9a30d6c62c]SCMI stands for System Control and Management Interface, not System Control and Power Interface -- apparently, Sudeep Holla copied this line from his SCPI driver and then just forgot to update the acronym explanation... :-)
Fixes 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")Signed-off-by Sergey Shtylyov <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Sasha Levin <[email protected]>drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +0
-0
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c line 3
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +1
-1@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 /* -* System Control and Power Interface (SCMI) based CPUFreq Interface driver +* System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) based CPUFreq Interface driver
Is the comment fix really worth pushing to stable? (I thought they were going
to remove the Fixes tag before applying...)
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c line 6
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +0
-0* * Copyright (C) 2018-2021 ARM Ltd. * Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
MBR, Sergey