Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

PATCH New [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Mar 9

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 579a752464a64cb5f9139102f0e6b90a1f595ceb
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026030919-paramount-foyer-8351@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 579a752464a64cb5f9139102f0e6b90a1f595ceb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 11:56:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used

Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning:

msk->pm.local_addr_used == 0

  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at __mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210, CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 961 Comm: syz.2.17 Not tainted 6.19.0-08368-gfafda3b4b06b #22 PREEMPT(full)
  Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1build1 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:__mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210
  Code: 89 c5 e8 46 30 6f fe e9 21 fd ff ff 49 83 ed 80 e8 38 30 6f fe 4c 89 ef be 03 00 00 00 e8 db 49 df fe eb ac e8 24 30 6f fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 1d ff ff ff e8 16 30 6f fe eb 05 e8 0f 30 6f fe e8 9a
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90001663880 EFLAGS: 00010293
  RAX: ffffffff82de1a6c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88800722b500
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff8880158b22d0 R08: 0000000000010425 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffffffff82de18ba R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88800641a640
  R13: ffff8880158b1880 R14: ffff88801ec3c900 R15: ffff88800641a650
  FS:  00005555722c3500(0000) GS:ffff8880f909d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f66346e0f60 CR3: 000000001607c000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x117/0x180 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115
   genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline]
   genl_rcv_msg+0x3a8/0x3f0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210
   netlink_rcv_skb+0x16d/0x240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550
   genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219
   netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline]
   netlink_unicast+0x3e9/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344
   netlink_sendmsg+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894
   sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]
   __sock_sendmsg+0xc9/0xf0 net/socket.c:742
   ____sys_sendmsg+0x272/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2592
   ___sys_sendmsg+0x2de/0x320 net/socket.c:2646
   __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2678 [inline]
   __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2683 [inline]
   __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2681 [inline]
   __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2681
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x143/0x440 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  RIP: 0033:0x7f66346f826d
  Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007ffc83d8bdc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6634985fa0 RCX: 00007f66346f826d
  RDX: 00000000040000b0 RSI: 0000200000000740 RDI: 0000000000000007
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6634985fa8
  R13: 00007f6634985fac R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001770
   </TASK>

The actions that caused that seem to be:

- Set the MPTCP subflows limit to 0
- Create an MPTCP endpoint with both the 'signal' and 'subflow' flags
- Create a new MPTCP connection from a different address: an ADD_ADDR linked to the MPTCP endpoint will be sent ('signal' flag), but no subflows is initiated ('subflow' flag)
- Remove the MPTCP endpoint

In this case, msk->pm.local_addr_used has been kept to 0 -- because no subflows have been created -- but the corresponding bit in msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap has been cleared when the ADD_ADDR has been sent. This later causes a splat when removing the MPTCP endpoint because msk->pm.local_addr_used has been kept to 0.

Now, if an endpoint has both the signal and subflow flags, but it is not possible to create subflows because of the limits or the c-flag case, then the local endpoint counter is still incremented: the endpoint is used at the end. This avoids issues later when removing the endpoint and calling __mark_subflow_endp_available(), which expects msk->pm.local_addr_used to have been previously incremented if the endpoint was marked as used according to msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap.

Note that signal_and_subflow variable is reset to false when the limits and the c-flag case allows subflows creation. Also, local_addr_used is only incremented for non ID0 subflows.

net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c +9 -0
index b5316a6c7d1b..b2b9df43960e 100644
@@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	}
 
 exit:
+	/* If an endpoint has both the signal and subflow flags, but it is not
+	 * possible to create subflows -- the 'while' loop body above never
+	 * executed --  then still mark the endp as used, which is somehow the
+	 * case. This avoids issues later when removing the endpoint and calling
+	 * __mark_subflow_endp_available(), which expects the increment here.
+	 */
+	if (signal_and_subflow && local.addr.id != msk->mpc_endpoint_id)
+		msk->pm.local_addr_used++;
+
 	mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(msk);
 }
 
maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used

From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 579a752464a64cb5f9139102f0e6b90a1f595ceb ]

Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning:

msk->pm.local_addr_used == 0

  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at __mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 at mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210, CPU#1: syz.2.17/961
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 961 Comm: syz.2.17 Not tainted 6.19.0-08368-gfafda3b4b06b #22 PREEMPT(full)
  Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1build1 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:__mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1103 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1210
  Code: 89 c5 e8 46 30 6f fe e9 21 fd ff ff 49 83 ed 80 e8 38 30 6f fe 4c 89 ef be 03 00 00 00 e8 db 49 df fe eb ac e8 24 30 6f fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 1d ff ff ff e8 16 30 6f fe eb 05 e8 0f 30 6f fe e8 9a
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90001663880 EFLAGS: 00010293
  RAX: ffffffff82de1a6c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88800722b500
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff8880158b22d0 R08: 0000000000010425 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffffffff82de18ba R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88800641a640
  R13: ffff8880158b1880 R14: ffff88801ec3c900 R15: ffff88800641a650
  FS:  00005555722c3500(0000) GS:ffff8880f909d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f66346e0f60 CR3: 000000001607c000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x117/0x180 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115
   genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline]
   genl_rcv_msg+0x3a8/0x3f0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210
   netlink_rcv_skb+0x16d/0x240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550
   genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219
   netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline]
   netlink_unicast+0x3e9/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344
   netlink_sendmsg+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894
   sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]
   __sock_sendmsg+0xc9/0xf0 net/socket.c:742
   ____sys_sendmsg+0x272/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2592
   ___sys_sendmsg+0x2de/0x320 net/socket.c:2646
   __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2678 [inline]
   __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2683 [inline]
   __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2681 [inline]
   __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2681
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x143/0x440 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  RIP: 0033:0x7f66346f826d
  Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007ffc83d8bdc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6634985fa0 RCX: 00007f66346f826d
  RDX: 00000000040000b0 RSI: 0000200000000740 RDI: 0000000000000007
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6634985fa8
  R13: 00007f6634985fac R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001770
   </TASK>

The actions that caused that seem to be:

- Set the MPTCP subflows limit to 0
- Create an MPTCP endpoint with both the 'signal' and 'subflow' flags
- Create a new MPTCP connection from a different address: an ADD_ADDR linked to the MPTCP endpoint will be sent ('signal' flag), but no subflows is initiated ('subflow' flag)
- Remove the MPTCP endpoint

In this case, msk->pm.local_addr_used has been kept to 0 -- because no subflows have been created -- but the corresponding bit in msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap has been cleared when the ADD_ADDR has been sent. This later causes a splat when removing the MPTCP endpoint because msk->pm.local_addr_used has been kept to 0.

Now, if an endpoint has both the signal and subflow flags, but it is not possible to create subflows because of the limits or the c-flag case, then the local endpoint counter is still incremented: the endpoint is used at the end. This avoids issues later when removing the endpoint and calling __mark_subflow_endp_available(), which expects msk->pm.local_addr_used to have been previously incremented if the endpoint was marked as used according to msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap.

Note that signal_and_subflow variable is reset to false when the limits and the c-flag case allows subflows creation. Also, local_addr_used is only incremented for non ID0 subflows.

---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +9 -0
index 4b805d7f5769f..5013c0db35cf7 100644
@@ -662,6 +662,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	}
 
 exit:
+	/* If an endpoint has both the signal and subflow flags, but it is not
+	 * possible to create subflows -- the 'while' loop body above never
+	 * executed --  then still mark the endp as used, which is somehow the
+	 * case. This avoids issues later when removing the endpoint and calling
+	 * __mark_subflow_endp_available(), which expects the increment here.
+	 */
+	if (signal_and_subflow && local.addr.id != msk->mpc_endpoint_id)
+		msk->pm.local_addr_used++;
+
 	mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(msk);
 }
 
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0