Skip to contentSkip to conversation

sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock

PATCH In review Tejun Heo 4 participants 10 messages Mar 29 – Mar 30

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Tejun Heo

author reviewer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock

Hello,

SCX_KICK_WAIT busy-waits in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() until the target CPU reschedules. Because the irq_work runs in hardirq context, the waiting CPU's kick_sync never advances, and if multiple CPUs form a wait cycle, all deadlock. This was reported by Christian while testing on arm64.

0001 fixes the deadlock by deferring the wait to a balance callback which drops the rq lock and enables IRQs, allowing IPIs to be processed and kick_sync to keep advancing during the wait.

0002 adds a selftest that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle to reproduce the issue.

Based on sched_ext/for-7.0-fixes (db08b1940f4b).

0001-sched_ext-Fix-SCX_KICK_WAIT-deadlock-by-deferring-wa.patch 0002-selftests-sched_ext-Add-cyclic-SCX_KICK_WAIT-stress-.patch

 kernel/sched/ext.c                                 |  95 +++++++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h                               |   3 +
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.bpf.c     |  68 ++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

--
tejun

author reviewer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock by deferring wait to balance callback

SCX_KICK_WAIT busy-waits in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() using smp_cond_load_acquire() until the target CPU's kick_sync advances. Because the irq_work runs in hardirq context, the waiting CPU cannot reschedule and its own kick_sync never advances. If multiple CPUs form a wait cycle, all CPUs deadlock.

Replace the busy-wait in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() with resched_curr() to force the CPU through do_pick_task_scx(), which queues a balance callback to perform the wait. The balance callback drops the rq lock and enables IRQs following the sched_core_balance() pattern, so the CPU can process IPIs while waiting. The local CPU's kick_sync is advanced on entry to do_pick_task_scx() and continuously during the wait, ensuring any CPU that starts waiting for us sees the advancement and cannot form cyclic dependencies.

Fixes 90e55164dad4 ("sched_ext: Implement SCX_KICK_WAIT")
Cc [email protected] # v6.12+
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c   | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/ext.c +70 -25
index 26a6ac2f8826..d5bdcdb3f700 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 {
 	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_root;
 
-	/* see kick_cpus_irq_workfn() */
+	/* see kick_sync_wait_bal_cb() */
 	smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
 
 	update_curr_scx(rq);
@@ -2447,6 +2447,48 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 		switch_class(rq, next);
 }
 
+static void kick_sync_wait_bal_cb(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct scx_kick_syncs __rcu *ks = __this_cpu_read(scx_kick_syncs);
+	unsigned long *ksyncs = rcu_dereference_sched(ks)->syncs;
+	bool waited;
+	s32 cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * Drop rq lock and enable IRQs while waiting. IRQs must be enabled
+	 * — a target CPU may be waiting for us to process an IPI (e.g. TLB
+	 * flush) while we wait for its kick_sync to advance.
+	 *
+	 * Also, keep advancing our own kick_sync so that new kick_sync waits
+	 * targeting us, which can start after we drop the lock, cannot form
+	 * cyclic dependencies.
+	 */
+retry:
+	waited = false;
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, rq->scx.cpus_to_sync) {
+		/*
+		 * smp_load_acquire() pairs with smp_store_release() on
+		 * kick_sync updates on the target CPUs.
+		 */
+		if (cpu == cpu_of(rq) ||
+		    smp_load_acquire(&cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync) != ksyncs[cpu]) {
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rq->scx.cpus_to_sync);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(rq);
+		while (READ_ONCE(cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync) == ksyncs[cpu]) {
+			smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
+			cpu_relax();
+		}
+		raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(rq);
+		waited = true;
+	}
+
+	if (waited)
+		goto retry;
+}
+
 static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.local_dsq.list,
@@ -2460,7 +2502,7 @@ do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
 	bool keep_prev;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	/* see kick_cpus_irq_workfn() */
+	/* see kick_sync_wait_bal_cb() */
 	smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
 
 	rq_modified_begin(rq, &ext_sched_class);
@@ -2470,6 +2512,17 @@ do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
 	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
 	maybe_queue_balance_callback(rq);
 
+	/*
+	 * Defer to a balance callback which can drop rq lock and enable
+	 * IRQs. Waiting directly in the pick path would deadlock against
+	 * CPUs sending us IPIs (e.g. TLB flushes) while we wait for them.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(rq->scx.kick_sync_pending)) {
+		rq->scx.kick_sync_pending = false;
+		queue_balance_callback(rq, &rq->scx.kick_sync_bal_cb,
+				       kick_sync_wait_bal_cb);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If any higher-priority sched class enqueued a runnable task on
 	 * this rq during balance_one(), abort and return RETRY_TASK, so
@@ -4713,6 +4766,9 @@ static void scx_dump_state(struct scx_exit_info *ei, size_t dump_len)
 		if (!cpumask_empty(rq->scx.cpus_to_wait))
 			dump_line(&ns, "  cpus_to_wait   : %*pb",
 				  cpumask_pr_args(rq->scx.cpus_to_wait));
+		if (!cpumask_empty(rq->scx.cpus_to_sync))
+			dump_line(&ns, "  cpus_to_sync   : %*pb",
+				  cpumask_pr_args(rq->scx.cpus_to_sync));
 
 		used = seq_buf_used(&ns);
 		if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, dump_cpu)) {
@@ -5610,11 +5666,11 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long *ksyncs)
 
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait)) {
 			if (cur_class == &ext_sched_class) {
+				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_sync);
 				ksyncs[cpu] = rq->scx.kick_sync;
 				should_wait = true;
-			} else {
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
 			}
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
 		}
 
 		resched_curr(rq);
@@ -5669,27 +5725,15 @@ static void kick_cpus_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_kick_if_idle);
 	}
 
-	if (!should_wait)
-		return;
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait) {
-		unsigned long *wait_kick_sync = &cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync;
-
-		/*
-		 * Busy-wait until the task running at the time of kicking is no
-		 * longer running. This can be used to implement e.g. core
-		 * scheduling.
-		 *
-		 * smp_cond_load_acquire() pairs with store_releases in
-		 * pick_task_scx() and put_prev_task_scx(). The former breaks
-		 * the wait if SCX's scheduling path is entered even if the same
-		 * task is picked subsequently. The latter is necessary to break
-		 * the wait when $cpu is taken by a higher sched class.
-		 */
-		if (cpu != cpu_of(this_rq))
-			smp_cond_load_acquire(wait_kick_sync, VAL != ksyncs[cpu]);
-
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
+	/*
+	 * Can't wait in hardirq — kick_sync can't advance, deadlocking if
+	 * CPUs wait for each other. Defer to kick_sync_wait_bal_cb().
+	 */
+	if (should_wait) {
+		raw_spin_rq_lock(this_rq);
+		this_scx->kick_sync_pending = true;
+		resched_curr(this_rq);
+		raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -5794,6 +5838,7 @@ void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_kick_if_idle, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_preempt, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_wait, GFP_KERNEL, n));
+		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_sync, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		rq->scx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);
 		rq->scx.kick_cpus_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(kick_cpus_irq_workfn);
 
kernel/sched/sched.h +3 -0
index 43bbf0693cca..1ef9ba480f51 100644
@@ -805,9 +805,12 @@ struct scx_rq {
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_kick_if_idle;
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_preempt;
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_wait;
+	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_sync;
+	bool			kick_sync_pending;
 	unsigned long		kick_sync;
 	local_t			reenq_local_deferred;
 	struct balance_callback	deferred_bal_cb;
+	struct balance_callback	kick_sync_bal_cb;
 	struct irq_work		deferred_irq_work;
 	struct irq_work		kick_cpus_irq_work;
 	struct scx_dispatch_q	bypass_dsq;
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
reviewer
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock by deferring wait to balance callback

Hi Tejun,

Quoted 42 lines · Tejun Heo

SCX_KICK_WAIT busy-waits in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() using smp_cond_load_acquire() until the target CPU's kick_sync advances. Because the irq_work runs in hardirq context, the waiting CPU cannot reschedule and its own kick_sync never advances. If multiple CPUs form a wait cycle, all CPUs deadlock.

Replace the busy-wait in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() with resched_curr() to force the CPU through do_pick_task_scx(), which queues a balance callback to perform the wait. The balance callback drops the rq lock and enables IRQs following the sched_core_balance() pattern, so the CPU can process IPIs while waiting. The local CPU's kick_sync is advanced on entry to do_pick_task_scx() and continuously during the wait, ensuring any CPU that starts waiting for us sees the advancement and cannot form cyclic dependencies.

Fixes 90e55164dad4 ("sched_ext: Implement SCX_KICK_WAIT")
Cc [email protected] # v6.12+
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c   | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/ext.c +1 -1
index 26a6ac2f8826..d5bdcdb3f700 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 {
 	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_root;
 
-	/* see kick_cpus_irq_workfn() */
+	/* see kick_sync_wait_bal_cb() */
 	smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
 
 	update_curr_scx(rq);
@@ -2447,6 +2447,48 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 		switch_class(rq, next);
 }
 

kernel/sched/ext.c static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, · line 2459

Quoted 10 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +10 -0
+static void kick_sync_wait_bal_cb(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct scx_kick_syncs __rcu *ks = __this_cpu_read(scx_kick_syncs);
+	unsigned long *ksyncs = rcu_dereference_sched(ks)->syncs;
+	bool waited;
+	s32 cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * Drop rq lock and enable IRQs while waiting. IRQs must be enabled
+	 * — a target CPU may be waiting for us to process an IPI (e.g. TLB

nit: s/—/-/

Quoted 8 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +8 -0
+	 * flush) while we wait for its kick_sync to advance.
+	 *
+	 * Also, keep advancing our own kick_sync so that new kick_sync waits
+	 * targeting us, which can start after we drop the lock, cannot form
+	 * cyclic dependencies.
+	 */
+retry:
+	waited = false;

kernel/sched/ext.c static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, · line 2477

Quoted 10 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +10 -0
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, rq->scx.cpus_to_sync) {
+		/*
+		 * smp_load_acquire() pairs with smp_store_release() on
+		 * kick_sync updates on the target CPUs.
+		 */
+		if (cpu == cpu_of(rq) ||
+		    smp_load_acquire(&cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync) != ksyncs[cpu]) {
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rq->scx.cpus_to_sync);
+			continue;
+		}

Should we add something like:

		if (cpu != cpu_of(rq) && !cpu_online(cpu)) {
			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rq->scx.cpus_to_sync);
			continue;
		}

kernel/sched/ext.c static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, · line 2480

Quoted 3 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +3 -0
+
+		raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(rq);
+		while (READ_ONCE(cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync) == ksyncs[cpu]) {

And here:

			if (cpu != cpu_of(rq) && !cpu_online(cpu))
				break;

(see below)

Quoted 26 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +12 -1
+			smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
+			cpu_relax();
+		}
+		raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(rq);
+		waited = true;
+	}
+
+	if (waited)
+		goto retry;
+}
+
 static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.local_dsq.list,
@@ -2460,7 +2502,7 @@ do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
 	bool keep_prev;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	/* see kick_cpus_irq_workfn() */
+	/* see kick_sync_wait_bal_cb() */
 	smp_store_release(&rq->scx.kick_sync, rq->scx.kick_sync + 1);
 
 	rq_modified_begin(rq, &ext_sched_class);
@@ -2470,6 +2512,17 @@ do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
 	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
 	maybe_queue_balance_callback(rq);

kernel/sched/ext.c do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx) · line 2523

Quoted 10 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +9 -0
 
+	/*
+	 * Defer to a balance callback which can drop rq lock and enable
+	 * IRQs. Waiting directly in the pick path would deadlock against
+	 * CPUs sending us IPIs (e.g. TLB flushes) while we wait for them.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(rq->scx.kick_sync_pending)) {
+		rq->scx.kick_sync_pending = false;
+		queue_balance_callback(rq, &rq->scx.kick_sync_bal_cb,
+				       kick_sync_wait_bal_cb);

queue_balance_callback() is a no-op if the rq is in balance_push, but I guess it's ok to just clear the kick_sync_pending if we add the checks above.

Quoted 94 lines
kernel/sched/ext.c +17 -23
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If any higher-priority sched class enqueued a runnable task on
 	 * this rq during balance_one(), abort and return RETRY_TASK, so
@@ -4713,6 +4766,9 @@ static void scx_dump_state(struct scx_exit_info *ei, size_t dump_len)
 		if (!cpumask_empty(rq->scx.cpus_to_wait))
 			dump_line(&ns, "  cpus_to_wait   : %*pb",
 				  cpumask_pr_args(rq->scx.cpus_to_wait));
+		if (!cpumask_empty(rq->scx.cpus_to_sync))
+			dump_line(&ns, "  cpus_to_sync   : %*pb",
+				  cpumask_pr_args(rq->scx.cpus_to_sync));
 
 		used = seq_buf_used(&ns);
 		if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, dump_cpu)) {
@@ -5610,11 +5666,11 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long *ksyncs)
 
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait)) {
 			if (cur_class == &ext_sched_class) {
+				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_sync);
 				ksyncs[cpu] = rq->scx.kick_sync;
 				should_wait = true;
-			} else {
-				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
 			}
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
 		}
 
 		resched_curr(rq);
@@ -5669,27 +5725,15 @@ static void kick_cpus_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_kick_if_idle);
 	}
 
-	if (!should_wait)
-		return;
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait) {
-		unsigned long *wait_kick_sync = &cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.kick_sync;
-
-		/*
-		 * Busy-wait until the task running at the time of kicking is no
-		 * longer running. This can be used to implement e.g. core
-		 * scheduling.
-		 *
-		 * smp_cond_load_acquire() pairs with store_releases in
-		 * pick_task_scx() and put_prev_task_scx(). The former breaks
-		 * the wait if SCX's scheduling path is entered even if the same
-		 * task is picked subsequently. The latter is necessary to break
-		 * the wait when $cpu is taken by a higher sched class.
-		 */
-		if (cpu != cpu_of(this_rq))
-			smp_cond_load_acquire(wait_kick_sync, VAL != ksyncs[cpu]);
-
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_wait);
+	/*
+	 * Can't wait in hardirq — kick_sync can't advance, deadlocking if
+	 * CPUs wait for each other. Defer to kick_sync_wait_bal_cb().
+	 */
+	if (should_wait) {
+		raw_spin_rq_lock(this_rq);
+		this_scx->kick_sync_pending = true;
+		resched_curr(this_rq);
+		raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -5794,6 +5838,7 @@ void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_kick_if_idle, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_preempt, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_wait, GFP_KERNEL, n));
+		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_sync, GFP_KERNEL, n));
 		rq->scx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);
 		rq->scx.kick_cpus_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(kick_cpus_irq_workfn);
 
kernel/sched/sched.h +3 -0
index 43bbf0693cca..1ef9ba480f51 100644
@@ -805,9 +805,12 @@ struct scx_rq {
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_kick_if_idle;
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_preempt;
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_wait;
+	cpumask_var_t		cpus_to_sync;
+	bool			kick_sync_pending;
 	unsigned long		kick_sync;
 	local_t			reenq_local_deferred;
 	struct balance_callback	deferred_bal_cb;
+	struct balance_callback	kick_sync_bal_cb;
 	struct irq_work		deferred_irq_work;
 	struct irq_work		kick_cpus_irq_work;
 	struct scx_dispatch_q	bypass_dsq;
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0

Thanks,
-Andrea

author reviewer
#3 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

In reply to Tejun Heo

Add a test that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle (A->B->C->A). A BPF scheduler kicks the next CPU in the ring with SCX_KICK_WAIT on every enqueue while userspace workers generate continuous scheduling churn via sched_yield(). Without the preceding fix, this hangs the machine within seconds.

---
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/Makefile    |   1 +
 .../sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.bpf.c          |  68 ++++++
 .../selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c    | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c
tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/Makefile +1 -0
index 006300ac6dff..1c9ca328cca1 100644
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ auto-test-targets :=			\
 	rt_stall			\
 	test_example			\
 	total_bw			\
+	cyclic_kick_wait		\
 
 testcase-targets := $(addsuffix .o,$(addprefix $(SCXOBJ_DIR)/,$(auto-test-targets)))
 
tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.bpf.c new file +68 -0

68 lines not on this page · raw message

tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c new file +194 -0

194 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

Hi Tejun,

Quoted 4 lines · Tejun Heo

Add a test that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle (A->B->C->A). A BPF scheduler kicks the next CPU in the ring with SCX_KICK_WAIT on every enqueue while userspace workers generate continuous scheduling churn via sched_yield(). Without the preceding fix, this hangs the machine within seconds.

I think it would be better to skip this test on older, unpatched kernels. Sometimes I use my local kernel for testing before the stable patches are fully integrated, so skipping the test would be a safer approach.

Otherwise, this test can stall the machine and make it impossible to exit the test runner.

Log:

$ sudo ./runner -t cyclic_kick_wait # on v6.14
===== START =====
TEST: cyclic_kick_wait
DESCRIPTION: Verify SCX_KICK_WAIT forward progress under a 3-CPU wait cycle
OUTPUT:
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member cgroup_set_bandwidth not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member cgroup_set_idle not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member priv not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
ERR: cyclic_kick_wait.c:169
Failed to join worker thread 0 (-110)

Thanks,
Cheng-Yang

From 6f09d2298e547aa7a519d4bff262fc6851a969ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cheng-Yang Chou <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:07:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/sched_ext: Skip cyclic_kick_wait on kernels without
deadlock fix

The cyclic_kick_wait test triggers a deadlock on kernels lacking the SCX_KICK_WAIT fix, causing the machine to hang or worker threads to timeout (-110).

Use __COMPAT_struct_has_field() to probe vmlinux BTF for rq_scx.kick_sync_pending, a field introduced by the SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock fix. Skip the test on older kernels that lack the fix rather than hanging the machine.

Example failure on unpatched kernels:
ERR: cyclic_kick_wait.c:169
Failed to join worker thread 0 (-110)

Fixes e9b990b76922 ("selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test")
---
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c +5 -0
index c2e5aa9de715..b060ffe63ba3 100644
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ static enum scx_test_status setup(void **ctx)
 {
 	struct cyclic_kick_wait *skel;
 
+	if (!__COMPAT_struct_has_field("rq_scx", "kick_sync_pending")) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Skipping test: kernel lacks SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock fix\n");
+		return SCX_TEST_SKIP;
+	}
+
 	skel = cyclic_kick_wait__open();
 	SCX_FAIL_IF(!skel, "Failed to open skel");
 	SCX_ENUM_INIT(skel);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
reviewer
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

Hi Cheng-Yang,

Quoted 8 lines · Cheng-Yang Chou

Hi Tejun,

Quoted 4 lines · Tejun Heo

Add a test that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle (A->B->C->A). A BPF scheduler kicks the next CPU in the ring with SCX_KICK_WAIT on every enqueue while userspace workers generate continuous scheduling churn via sched_yield(). Without the preceding fix, this hangs the machine within seconds.

Quoted 6 lines

I think it would be better to skip this test on older, unpatched kernels. Sometimes I use my local kernel for testing before the stable patches are fully integrated, so skipping the test would be a safer approach.

Otherwise, this test can stall the machine and make it impossible to exit the test runner.

Actually, I disagree. The whole point of the kselftests is to expose kernel issues, including bugs in older kernels that may need fixes. So, I think we shouldn't skip the test.

-Andrea

Quoted 62 lines

Log:

$ sudo ./runner -t cyclic_kick_wait # on v6.14
===== START =====
TEST: cyclic_kick_wait
DESCRIPTION: Verify SCX_KICK_WAIT forward progress under a 3-CPU wait cycle
OUTPUT:
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member cgroup_set_bandwidth not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member cgroup_set_idle not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
libbpf: struct_ops cyclic_kick_wait_ops: member priv not found in kernel, skipping it as it's set to zero
ERR: cyclic_kick_wait.c:169
Failed to join worker thread 0 (-110)

Thanks,
Cheng-Yang

From 6f09d2298e547aa7a519d4bff262fc6851a969ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cheng-Yang Chou <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:07:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/sched_ext: Skip cyclic_kick_wait on kernels without
deadlock fix

The cyclic_kick_wait test triggers a deadlock on kernels lacking the SCX_KICK_WAIT fix, causing the machine to hang or worker threads to timeout (-110).

Use __COMPAT_struct_has_field() to probe vmlinux BTF for rq_scx.kick_sync_pending, a field introduced by the SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock fix. Skip the test on older kernels that lack the fix rather than hanging the machine.

Example failure on unpatched kernels:
ERR: cyclic_kick_wait.c:169
Failed to join worker thread 0 (-110)

Fixes e9b990b76922 ("selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test")
---
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c +5 -0
index c2e5aa9de715..b060ffe63ba3 100644
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ static enum scx_test_status setup(void **ctx)
 {
 	struct cyclic_kick_wait *skel;
 
+	if (!__COMPAT_struct_has_field("rq_scx", "kick_sync_pending")) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Skipping test: kernel lacks SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock fix\n");
+		return SCX_TEST_SKIP;
+	}
+
 	skel = cyclic_kick_wait__open();
 	SCX_FAIL_IF(!skel, "Failed to open skel");
 	SCX_ENUM_INIT(skel);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

Hi Andrea,

Quoted 15 lines · Andrea Righi

Hi Cheng-Yang,

Quoted 12 lines · Cheng-Yang Chou

Hi Tejun,

Quoted 4 lines · Tejun Heo

Add a test that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle (A->B->C->A). A BPF scheduler kicks the next CPU in the ring with SCX_KICK_WAIT on every enqueue while userspace workers generate continuous scheduling churn via sched_yield(). Without the preceding fix, this hangs the machine within seconds.

I think it would be better to skip this test on older, unpatched kernels. Sometimes I use my local kernel for testing before the stable patches are fully integrated, so skipping the test would be a safer approach.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Otherwise, this test can stall the machine and make it impossible to exit the test runner.

Actually, I disagree. The whole point of the kselftests is to expose kernel issues, including bugs in older kernels that may need fixes. So, I think we shouldn't skip the test.

I see your point. While the system stall is a bit painful during local machine testing on unpatched kernels, I agree that kselftests should remain an effective gatekeeper for kernel issues.

Or maybe return SCX_TEST_FAIL?

Since without this patch, this test won't pass anyway. Perhaps failing more gracefully is a better middle ground than stalling the entire machine.

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Cheng-Yang
Reviewed-by on v1 2/2
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

In reply to Tejun Heo
Quoted 6 lines · Tejun Heo

Add a test that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle (A->B->C->A). A BPF scheduler kicks the next CPU in the ring with SCX_KICK_WAIT on every enqueue while userspace workers generate continuous scheduling churn via sched_yield(). Without the preceding fix, this hangs the machine within seconds.

Tested-by on v1 1/1
#8 lore raw
In reply to Tejun Heo
Quoted 26 lines · Tejun Heo

Hello,

SCX_KICK_WAIT busy-waits in kick_cpus_irq_workfn() until the target CPU reschedules. Because the irq_work runs in hardirq context, the waiting CPU's kick_sync never advances, and if multiple CPUs form a wait cycle, all deadlock. This was reported by Christian while testing on arm64.

0001 fixes the deadlock by deferring the wait to a balance callback which drops the rq lock and enables IRQs, allowing IPIs to be processed and kick_sync to keep advancing during the wait.

0002 adds a selftest that creates a 3-CPU kick_wait cycle to reproduce the issue.

Based on sched_ext/for-7.0-fixes (db08b1940f4b).

0001-sched_ext-Fix-SCX_KICK_WAIT-deadlock-by-deferring-wa.patch 0002-selftests-sched_ext-Add-cyclic-SCX_KICK_WAIT-stress-.patch

 kernel/sched/ext.c                                 |  95 +++++++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h                               |   3 +
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.bpf.c     |  68 ++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/sched_ext/cyclic_kick_wait.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Quoted 2 lines

--
tejun

For both:

Thanks for fixing this!

author reviewer
#9 lore raw
In reply to Tejun Heo

Hello,

Quoted 3 lines

Tejun Heo (2):
sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock by deferring wait to balance callback selftests/sched_ext: Add cyclic SCX_KICK_WAIT stress test

Applied 1-2 to sched_ext/for-7.0-fixes.

Thanks.

--
tejun