Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

PATCH New [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages May 7 – May 11

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fad217e16fded7f3c09f8637b0f6a224d58b5f2e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026050738-elves-ample-ee99@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From fad217e16fded7f3c09f8637b0f6a224d58b5f2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:06:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in
tracepoint_add_func()

When a tracepoint goes through the 0 -> 1 transition, tracepoint_add_func() invokes the subsystem's ext->regfunc() before attempting to install the new probe via func_add(). If func_add() then fails (for example, when allocate_probes() cannot allocate a new probe array under memory pressure and returns -ENOMEM), the function returns the error without calling the matching ext->unregfunc(), leaving the side effects of regfunc() behind with no installed probe to justify them.

For syscall tracepoints this is particularly unpleasant: syscall_regfunc() bumps sys_tracepoint_refcount and sets SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT on every task. After a leaked failure, the refcount is stuck at a non-zero value with no consumer, and every task continues paying the syscall trace entry/exit overhead until reboot. Other subsystems providing regfunc()/unregfunc() pairs exhibit similarly scoped persistent state.

Mirror the existing 1 -> 0 cleanup and call ext->unregfunc() in the func_add() error path, gated on the same condition used there so the unwind is symmetric with the registration.

Fixes 8cf868affdc4 ("tracing: Have the reg function allow to fail")
Cc Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
kernel/tracepoint.c +2 -0
index 91905aa19294..dffef52a807b 100644
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
 			lockdep_is_held(&tracepoints_mutex));
 	old = func_add(&tp_funcs, func, prio);
 	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
+		if (tp->ext && tp->ext->unregfunc && !static_key_enabled(&tp->key))
+			tp->ext->unregfunc();
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && PTR_ERR(old) != -ENOMEM);
 		return PTR_ERR(old);
 	}
maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 tracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in tracepoint_add_func()

From: David Carlier <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fad217e16fded7f3c09f8637b0f6a224d58b5f2e ]

When a tracepoint goes through the 0 -> 1 transition, tracepoint_add_func() invokes the subsystem's ext->regfunc() before attempting to install the new probe via func_add(). If func_add() then fails (for example, when allocate_probes() cannot allocate a new probe array under memory pressure and returns -ENOMEM), the function returns the error without calling the matching ext->unregfunc(), leaving the side effects of regfunc() behind with no installed probe to justify them.

For syscall tracepoints this is particularly unpleasant: syscall_regfunc() bumps sys_tracepoint_refcount and sets SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT on every task. After a leaked failure, the refcount is stuck at a non-zero value with no consumer, and every task continues paying the syscall trace entry/exit overhead until reboot. Other subsystems providing regfunc()/unregfunc() pairs exhibit similarly scoped persistent state.

Mirror the existing 1 -> 0 cleanup and call ext->unregfunc() in the func_add() error path, gated on the same condition used there so the unwind is symmetric with the registration.

Fixes 8cf868affdc4 ("tracing: Have the reg function allow to fail")
Cc Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
[ changed `tp->ext->unregfunc` to `tp->unregfunc` to match older struct layout ]
---
 kernel/tracepoint.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
kernel/tracepoint.c +2 -0
index 2dff7f1a27ec0..7642926517cf8 100644
@@ -358,6 +358,8 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
 			lockdep_is_held(&tracepoints_mutex));
 	old = func_add(&tp_funcs, func, prio);
 	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
+		if (tp->unregfunc && !static_key_enabled(&tp->key))
+			tp->unregfunc();
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && PTR_ERR(old) != -ENOMEM);
 		return PTR_ERR(old);
 	}
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0