Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] 9p: skip nlink update in cacheless mode to fix WARN_ON" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

PATCH New [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Jul 20 – Jul 25

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 574aa0b4799470ac814479f1138d19efe6262255
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026072032-shaping-feast-8dd3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 574aa0b4799470ac814479f1138d19efe6262255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:41:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] 9p: skip nlink update in cacheless mode to fix WARN_ON

v9fs_dec_count() unconditionally calls drop_nlink() on regular files, even when the inode's nlink is already zero. In cacheless mode the client refetches inode metadata from the server (the source of truth) on every operation, so by the time v9fs_remove() returns, the locally cached nlink may already reflect the post-unlink value:

1. Client initiates unlink, server processes it and sets nlink to 0
2. Client refetches inode metadata (nlink=0) before unlink returns
3. Client's v9fs_remove() completes successfully
4. Client calls v9fs_dec_count() which calls drop_nlink() on nlink=0

This race is easily triggered under heavy unlink workloads, such as stress-ng's unlink stressor, producing the following warning:

  WARNING: fs/inode.c:417 at drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8
  Call trace:
   drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8
   v9fs_remove+0x1e0/0x250 [9p]
   v9fs_vfs_unlink+0x20/0x38 [9p]
   vfs_unlink+0x13c/0x258
   ...

In cacheless mode the server is authoritative and the inode is on its way out, so locally adjusting nlink buys nothing. Skip v9fs_dec_count() entirely when neither CACHE_META nor CACHE_LOOSE is set, which both avoids the warning and removes a class of nlink races (two concurrent unlinkers observing nlink > 0 and both calling drop_nlink()) that an nlink == 0 guard alone would only narrow rather than close.

Fixes ac89b2ef9b55 ("9p: don't maintain dir i_nlink if the exported fs doesn't either")

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +9 -0
index cdaa5034cbef..3a811db2dc19 100644
@@ -490,10 +490,19 @@ static int v9fs_at_to_dotl_flags(int flags)
  * - ext4 (with dir_nlink feature enabled) sets nlink to 1 if a dir has more
  *   than EXT4_LINK_MAX (65000) links.
  *
+ * In cacheless mode the server is the source of truth for nlink and the
+ * inode is going away immediately, so locally adjusting i_nlink buys
+ * nothing and races with concurrent metadata fetches that may already
+ * have observed the post-unlink value (nlink == 0).
+ *
  * @inode: inode whose nlink is being dropped
  */
 static void v9fs_dec_count(struct inode *inode)
 {
+	struct v9fs_session_info *v9ses = v9fs_inode2v9ses(inode);
+
+	if (!(v9ses->cache & (CACHE_META | CACHE_LOOSE)))
+		return;
 	if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || inode->i_nlink > 2)
 		drop_nlink(inode);
 }
maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 9p: skip nlink update in cacheless mode to fix WARN_ON

From: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 574aa0b4799470ac814479f1138d19efe6262255 ]

v9fs_dec_count() unconditionally calls drop_nlink() on regular files, even when the inode's nlink is already zero. In cacheless mode the client refetches inode metadata from the server (the source of truth) on every operation, so by the time v9fs_remove() returns, the locally cached nlink may already reflect the post-unlink value:

1. Client initiates unlink, server processes it and sets nlink to 0
2. Client refetches inode metadata (nlink=0) before unlink returns
3. Client's v9fs_remove() completes successfully
4. Client calls v9fs_dec_count() which calls drop_nlink() on nlink=0

This race is easily triggered under heavy unlink workloads, such as stress-ng's unlink stressor, producing the following warning:

  WARNING: fs/inode.c:417 at drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8
  Call trace:
   drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8
   v9fs_remove+0x1e0/0x250 [9p]
   v9fs_vfs_unlink+0x20/0x38 [9p]
   vfs_unlink+0x13c/0x258
   ...

In cacheless mode the server is authoritative and the inode is on its way out, so locally adjusting nlink buys nothing. Skip v9fs_dec_count() entirely when neither CACHE_META nor CACHE_LOOSE is set, which both avoids the warning and removes a class of nlink races (two concurrent unlinkers observing nlink > 0 and both calling drop_nlink()) that an nlink == 0 guard alone would only narrow rather than close.

Fixes ac89b2ef9b55 ("9p: don't maintain dir i_nlink if the exported fs doesn't either")

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

[ Adapted `v9ses->cache & (CACHE_META | CACHE_LOOSE)` bitmask test to the pre-bitmask exclusive enum form `v9ses->cache != CACHE_LOOSE && v9ses->cache != CACHE_FSCACHE`. ]
---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +9 -0
index 495631eba3a697..1e7dce81012794 100644
@@ -536,10 +536,19 @@ static int v9fs_at_to_dotl_flags(int flags)
  * - ext4 (with dir_nlink feature enabled) sets nlink to 1 if a dir has more
  *   than EXT4_LINK_MAX (65000) links.
  *
+ * In cacheless mode the server is the source of truth for nlink and the
+ * inode is going away immediately, so locally adjusting i_nlink buys
+ * nothing and races with concurrent metadata fetches that may already
+ * have observed the post-unlink value (nlink == 0).
+ *
  * @inode: inode whose nlink is being dropped
  */
 static void v9fs_dec_count(struct inode *inode)
 {
+	struct v9fs_session_info *v9ses = v9fs_inode2v9ses(inode);
+
+	if (v9ses->cache != CACHE_LOOSE && v9ses->cache != CACHE_FSCACHE)
+		return;
 	if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || inode->i_nlink > 2)
 		drop_nlink(inode);
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0