rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()
PATCH 1/2 rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()
From: Keenan Dong <[email protected]>
commit 3bfdc63936dd4773109b7b8c280c0f3b5ae7d349 upstream.
remove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for proxy-lock rollback in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() when invoked from futex_requeue().
In the latter case waiter::task is not current, but remove_waiter() operates on current for the dequeue operation. That results in several problems:
1) the rbtree dequeue happens without waiter::task::pi_lock being held
2) the waiter task's pi_blocked_on state is not cleared, which leaves a dangling pointer primed for UAF around.
3) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() operates on the wrong top priority waiter task
Use waiter::task instead of current in all related operations in remove_waiter() to cure those problems.
[ tglx: Fixup rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(), add a comment and amend the
changelog ]
--- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +7 -4
@@ -1061,20 +1061,23 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,* * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. I must * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex(). +* +* When invoked from rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() waiter::task != current ! */ static void remove_waiter (struct rt_mutex *lock,struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) {bool is_top_waiter = (waiter ==rt_mutex_top_waiter (lock));struct task_struct *owner =rt_mutex_owner (lock); +struct task_struct *waiter_task = waiter->task;struct rt_mutex *next_lock;lockdep_assert_held (&lock->wait_lock); -raw_spin_lock (¤t->pi_lock); +raw_spin_lock (&waiter_task->pi_lock);rt_mutex_dequeue (lock, waiter); - current->pi_blocked_on =NULL ; -raw_spin_unlock (¤t->pi_lock); + waiter_task->pi_blocked_on =NULL ; +raw_spin_unlock (&waiter_task->pi_lock);/* * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority
@@ -1110,7 +1113,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,raw_spin_unlock_irq (&lock->wait_lock);rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain (owner,RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK , lock, - next_lock,NULL , current); + next_lock,NULL , waiter_task);raw_spin_lock_irq (&lock->wait_lock); }
Signature · 1 line
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog
PATCH 2/2 locking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued
From: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 40a25d59e85b3c8709ac2424d44f65610467871e ]
syzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f] class_raw_spinlock_constructor remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561 rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120 futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0 __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection, leaving waiter->task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()") made this fatal.
Furthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter() upon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 ("futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() (where 'ret' was only ever 0 or < 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to account for try_to_take_rt_mutex().
--- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +4 -1
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,lockdep_assert_held (&lock->wait_lock); +if (!waiter_task)/* never enqueued */ +return ; +raw_spin_lock (&waiter_task->pi_lock);rt_mutex_dequeue (lock, waiter); waiter_task->pi_blocked_on =NULL ;
@@ -1803,7 +1806,7 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,raw_spin_lock_irq (&lock->wait_lock); ret =__rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock (lock, waiter, task); -if (unlikely (ret)) +if (unlikely (ret <0 ))remove_waiter (lock, waiter);raw_spin_unlock_irq (&lock->wait_lock);
Signature · 1 line
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog