ext4: clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA in swap_inode_boot_loader()
PATCH 1/1 ext4: clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA in swap_inode_boot_loader()
swap_inode_boot_loader() (EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT) checks !ext4_has_inline_data(inode), but neither checks ext4_has_inline_data(inode_bl) nor clears EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA on inode and inode_bl after swapping their inode data.
When a newly created empty file (which has EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA set in memory) is swapped with a non-empty EXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INO that already has extent blocks, the target inode retains EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA == 1 alongside extent blocks. A subsequent ftruncate() + small pwrite() + fsync() dirties folio 0 while converting the inode to inline data, hitting BUG_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA)) in ext4_writepages().
Reject inline data on inode_bl and clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA on both inodes in swap_inode_boot_loader().
---
fs/ext4/ioctl.c +3 -1
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb,if (inode->i_nlink !=1 || !S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) ||IS_SWAPFILE (inode) ||IS_ENCRYPTED (inode) || (EXT4_I (inode)->i_flags &EXT4_JOURNAL_DATA_FL ) || -ext4_has_inline_data (inode)) { +ext4_has_inline_data (inode) ||ext4_has_inline_data (inode_bl)) { err = -EINVAL ; goto journal_err_out; }
@@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb, size_bl = (qsize_t)(inode_bl->i_blocks) * (1 <<9 ) + inode_bl->i_bytes; diff = size - size_bl;swap_inode_data (inode, inode_bl); +ext4_clear_inode_state (inode,EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ); +ext4_clear_inode_state (inode_bl,EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA );inode_set_ctime_current (inode);inode_set_ctime_current (inode_bl);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
[email protected]
AI reviewSashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
Quoted 14 lines
swap_inode_boot_loader()(EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT) checks !ext4_has_inline_data(inode), but neither checksext4_has_inline_data(inode_bl)nor clearsEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAon inode andinode_blafter swapping their inode data.When a newly created empty file (which has
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAset in memory) is swapped with a non-emptyEXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INOthat already has extent blocks, the target inode retainsEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA== 1 alongside extent blocks. A subsequentftruncate()+ smallpwrite()+fsync()dirties folio 0 while converting the inode to inline data, hittingBUG_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA))inext4_writepages().
Quoted 6 lines
Reject inline data on
inode_bland clearEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAon both inodes inswap_inode_boot_loader().Fixes 67a11611e1a5 ("ext4: fix check of inode in swap_inode_boot_loader")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Hui Peng <[email protected]>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 25 lines · Hui Peng
swap_inode_boot_loader()(EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT) checks !ext4_has_inline_data(inode), but neither checksext4_has_inline_data(inode_bl)nor clearsEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAon inode andinode_blafter swapping their inode data.When a newly created empty file (which has
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAset in memory) is swapped with a non-emptyEXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INOthat already has extent blocks, the target inode retainsEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA== 1 alongside extent blocks. A subsequentftruncate()+ smallpwrite()+fsync()dirties folio 0 while converting the inode to inline data, hittingBUG_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA))inext4_writepages().Reject inline data on
inode_bland clearEXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATAon both inodes inswap_inode_boot_loader().Fixes 67a11611e1a5 ("ext4: fix check of inode in swap_inode_boot_loader")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Hui Peng <[email protected]>---
fs/ext4/ioctl.c static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb, · line 403
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/ioctl.c +1
-1@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb,if (inode->i_nlink !=1 || !S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) ||IS_SWAPFILE (inode) ||IS_ENCRYPTED (inode) || (EXT4_I (inode)->i_flags &EXT4_JOURNAL_DATA_FL ) || -ext4_has_inline_data (inode)) { +ext4_has_inline_data (inode) ||ext4_has_inline_data (inode_bl)) { err = -EINVAL ; goto journal_err_out; }
I guess instead we should add a check to check_igot_inode() that inode doesn't have inline data if EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL flag is set.
fs/ext4/ioctl.c static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb, · line 465
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/ioctl.c +2
-0@@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb, size_bl = (qsize_t)(inode_bl->i_blocks) * (1 <<9 ) + inode_bl->i_bytes; diff = size - size_bl;swap_inode_data (inode, inode_bl); +ext4_clear_inode_state (inode,EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ); +ext4_clear_inode_state (inode_bl,EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA );
Please don't touch inode_bl. That one should never have EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA set (and nobody can manipulate it directly anyway). For 'inode' I agree it will get blocks from inode_bl so better just clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR