ata: libata-core: Fix NO_FUA quirks shadowed by earlier quirk entries
Niklas Cassel
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ata: libata-core: Fix NO_FUA quirks shadowed by earlier quirk entries
ata_dev_quirks() uses the first entry in __ata_dev_quirks[] that matches the device and ignores all later entries. Commit 38d431229bfb ("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives") appended three ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA entries to the end of the table, with model patterns meant to cover whole product lines. Earlier entries already match some or all of these drives, so NO_FUA is not always applied:
- "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*" never takes effect. Every model it matches also matches the earlier "INTEL*SSD*" entry, so these drives only get ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM.
- "WDC*WD2500J*" does not take effect for "WDC WD2500JD-*" drives, which match the earlier ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM entry.
- "OCZ-VERTEX*" does not take effect for "OCZ-VERTEX" drives with firmware "1.30", which match the earlier ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA entry.
Move the Intel entry in front of "INTEL*SSD*" and keep ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM in it, so these drives stay on the ZERO_AFTER_TRIM whitelist. Add ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA to the WD2500JD and OCZ Vertex 1.30 entries. The quirks of all other drives are unchanged.
libata only uses FUA when it is enabled with libata.fua=1, so systems using the default setting are not affected.
--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +6 -3
@@ -4323,7 +4323,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "MAXTOR 6L080L4", "A93.0500", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA },/* this one allows HPA unlocking but fails IOs on the area */ - { "OCZ-VERTEX", "1.30", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA }, + { "OCZ-VERTEX", "1.30", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA },/* Devices which report 1 sector over size HPA */ { "ST340823A", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_HPA_SIZE },
@@ -4459,6 +4460,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "Crucial*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "INTEL SSDSC2KG480G8", "XCV10120", ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM | ATA_QUIRK_MAX_SEC }, + { "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "INTEL*SSD*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "SSD*INTEL*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "Samsung*SSD*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM },
@@ -4479,7 +4482,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "WDC WD1200JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD1600JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD2000JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, - { "WDC WD2500JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, + { "WDC WD2500JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "WDC WD3000JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD3200JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM },
@@ -4504,7 +4508,6 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "Maxtor", "BANC1G10", ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "WDC*WD2500J*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "OCZ-VERTEX*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, - { "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, /* End Marker */ { }
Signature · 1 line
2.56.0
Damien Le Moal
maintainerQuoted 22 lines · Niklas Cassel
ata_dev_quirks()uses the first entry in __ata_dev_quirks[] that matches the device and ignores all later entries. Commit38d431229bfb("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives") appended threeATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAentries to the end of the table, with model patterns meant to cover whole product lines. Earlier entries already match some or all of these drives, soNO_FUAis not always applied:- "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*" never takes effect. Every model it matches also matches the earlier "INTEL*SSD*" entry, so these drives only get
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM.- "WDC*WD2500J*" does not take effect for "WDC WD2500JD-*" drives, which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPMentry.- "OCZ-VERTEX*" does not take effect for "OCZ-VERTEX" drives with firmware "1.30", which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPAentry.Move the Intel entry in front of "INTEL*SSD*" and keep
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIMin it, so these drives stay on theZERO_AFTER_TRIMwhitelist. AddATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAto the WD2500JD and OCZ Vertex 1.30 entries. The quirks of all other drives are unchanged.
Quoted 6 lines
libata only uses FUA when it is enabled with libata.fua=1, so systems using the default setting are not affected.
Fixes 38d431229bfb ("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Your solution works, but I think it is very fragile. We will most likely again make the same mistake with the oredering. So what about something like this:
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +3 -2
@@ -4515,6 +4515,7 @@ static u64 ata_dev_quirks(const struct ata_device *dev)unsigned char model_num[ATA_ID_PROD_LEN +1 ];unsigned char model_rev[ATA_ID_FW_REV_LEN +1 ];const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry *ad = __ata_dev_quirks; +u64 quirks =0 ;/* dev->quirks is an u64. */ BUILD_BUG_ON (__ATA_QUIRK_MAX >64 );
@@ -4527,11 +4528,11 @@ static u64 ata_dev_quirks(const struct ata_device *dev) (!ad->model_rev || glob_match(ad->model_rev, model_rev))) {ata_dev_print_quirks (dev, model_num, model_rev, ad->quirks); -return ad->quirks; + quirks |= ad->quirks; } ad++; } -return 0 ; +return quirks; }static u64 ata_dev_get_max_sec_quirk_value (struct ata_device *dev)
With this, all quirks that apply to a device will apply, even if there are multiple matching entries. That will solve the issue and make things a lot more solid.
Quoted 45 lines
--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libata-core.c +6
-3@@ -4323,7 +4323,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "MAXTOR 6L080L4", "A93.0500", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA },/* this one allows HPA unlocking but fails IOs on the area */ - { "OCZ-VERTEX", "1.30", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA }, + { "OCZ-VERTEX", "1.30", ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPA | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA },/* Devices which report 1 sector over size HPA */ { "ST340823A", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_HPA_SIZE },@@ -4459,6 +4460,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "Crucial*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "INTEL SSDSC2KG480G8", "XCV10120", ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM | ATA_QUIRK_MAX_SEC }, + { "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "INTEL*SSD*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "SSD*INTEL*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM }, { "Samsung*SSD*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM },@@ -4479,7 +4482,8 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "WDC WD1200JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD1600JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD2000JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, - { "WDC WD2500JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, + { "WDC WD2500JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM | + ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "WDC WD3000JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM }, { "WDC WD3200JD-*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPM },@@ -4504,7 +4508,6 @@ static const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry __ata_dev_quirks[] = { { "Maxtor", "BANC1G10", ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "WDC*WD2500J*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, { "OCZ-VERTEX*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, - { "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*", NULL, ATA_QUIRK_NO_FUA }, /* End Marker */ { }
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Niklas Cassel
maintainerQuoted 47 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 22 lines · Niklas Cassel
ata_dev_quirks()uses the first entry in __ata_dev_quirks[] that matches the device and ignores all later entries. Commit38d431229bfb("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives") appended threeATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAentries to the end of the table, with model patterns meant to cover whole product lines. Earlier entries already match some or all of these drives, soNO_FUAis not always applied:- "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*" never takes effect. Every model it matches also matches the earlier "INTEL*SSD*" entry, so these drives only get
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM.- "WDC*WD2500J*" does not take effect for "WDC WD2500JD-*" drives, which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPMentry.- "OCZ-VERTEX*" does not take effect for "OCZ-VERTEX" drives with firmware "1.30", which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPAentry.Move the Intel entry in front of "INTEL*SSD*" and keep
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIMin it, so these drives stay on theZERO_AFTER_TRIMwhitelist. AddATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAto the WD2500JD and OCZ Vertex 1.30 entries. The quirks of all other drives are unchanged.Quoted 6 lines
libata only uses FUA when it is enabled with libata.fua=1, so systems using the default setting are not affected.
Fixes 38d431229bfb ("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>Your solution works, but I think it is very fragile. We will most likely again make the same mistake with the oredering. So what about something like this:
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +1
-0@@ -4515,6 +4515,7 @@ static u64 ata_dev_quirks(const struct ata_device *dev)unsigned char model_num[ATA_ID_PROD_LEN +1 ];unsigned char model_rev[ATA_ID_FW_REV_LEN +1 ];const struct ata_dev_quirks_entry *ad = __ata_dev_quirks; +u64 quirks =0 ;/* dev->quirks is an u64. */ BUILD_BUG_ON (__ATA_QUIRK_MAX >64 );@@ -4527,11 +4528,11 @@ static u64 ata_dev_quirks(const struct ata_device *dev) (!ad->model_rev || glob_match(ad->model_rev, model_rev))) {
drivers/ata/libata-core.c static u64 ata_dev_quirks(const struct ata_device *dev) · line 4536
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +2
-2ata_dev_print_quirks (dev, model_num, model_rev, ad->quirks); -return ad->quirks; + quirks |= ad->quirks; } ad++; } -return 0 ; +return quirks; }
I like the idea.
Send it as a real patch :)
Kind regards,
Niklas
Quoted 22 lines · Niklas Cassel
ata_dev_quirks()uses the first entry in __ata_dev_quirks[] that matches the device and ignores all later entries. Commit38d431229bfb("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives") appended threeATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAentries to the end of the table, with model patterns meant to cover whole product lines. Earlier entries already match some or all of these drives, soNO_FUAis not always applied:- "INTEL*SSDSC2CT*" never takes effect. Every model it matches also matches the earlier "INTEL*SSD*" entry, so these drives only get
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM.- "WDC*WD2500J*" does not take effect for "WDC WD2500JD-*" drives, which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_WD_BROKEN_LPMentry.- "OCZ-VERTEX*" does not take effect for "OCZ-VERTEX" drives with firmware "1.30", which match the earlier
ATA_QUIRK_BROKEN_HPAentry.Move the Intel entry in front of "INTEL*SSD*" and keep
ATA_QUIRK_ZERO_AFTER_TRIMin it, so these drives stay on theZERO_AFTER_TRIMwhitelist. AddATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAto the WD2500JD and OCZ Vertex 1.30 entries. The quirks of all other drives are unchanged.
Quoted 6 lines
libata only uses FUA when it is enabled with libata.fua=1, so systems using the default setting are not affected.
Fixes 38d431229bfb ("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Unfortunately, my idea does not work. So:
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Quoted 8 lines · Niklas Cassel
ata_dev_quirks()uses the first entry in __ata_dev_quirks[] that matches the device and ignores all later entries. Commit38d431229bfb("ata: libata: exclude FUA support for known buggy drives") appended threeATA_QUIRK_NO_FUAentries to the end of the table, with model patterns meant to cover whole product lines. Earlier entries already match some or all of these drives, soNO_FUAis not always applied:[...]
Applied to libata/linux.git (for-7.4), thanks!
[1/1] ata: libata-core: Fix NO_FUA quirks shadowed by earlier quirk entries
https://git.kernel.org/libata/linux/c/a9c6dc51
Kind regards,
Niklas