mm/damon/core: error damos_commit_quota_goal() for zero target_value
Subsystems (3)
SJ Park
maintainerRFC PATCH 1/1 mm/damon/core: error damos_commit_quota_goal() for zero target_value
Patch series "mm/damon: move zero damos quota target_value handling to the core layer".
Having zero DAMOS quota target value can cause division by zero. DAMON API callers are checking the target value parameters to avoid that. It is easy to make mistakes in some of the multiple API callers. Move that to the core layer.
Patch 1 adds the corner case handling into the core layer DAMON parameters validation logic. Patches 2 and 3 remove no more needed DAMON API callers side handling of the corner case in DAMON_LRU_SORT and DMON_SAMPLIE_MTIER, respectively.
This patch (of 3):
If a DAMOS scheme has a damos_quota_goal of zero target_value, damos_quota_goal() could trigger division-by-zero error. Hence each DAMON API callers should do the zero target_value validation. It is easy to make mistakes. Actually such bugs in DAMON_LRU_SORT and DAMON_SAMPLE_MTIER were found and fixed [1].
It is better to handle the corner case only once in the core layer, instead of multiple places in all DAMON API callers. One straightforward option is using an alternative denominator for the corner case in the damos_quota_goal(). However, the zero target_value is meaningless. In this case, the quota goal is always evaluated as achieved or over-achieved. The quota will only keep being reduced.
Simply avoid using zero target_value by adding a check in the core layer DAMOS quota goal parameters validation/commit path, damos_commit_quota_goal(). Update it to return an error in the case. Also update its caller to propagate the error.
Notes for stable kernel porting. The upstream commit doesn't have
Fixes: and therefore not ported to stable kernels. It turned out it fixes commit 8b549a4fd3c5 ("mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: commit damos quota goals user input to DAMOS") which was merged into v6.8. The user impact is a race condition that can result in divide-by-zero. Hence backport. Reproducing the issue requires sysfs write permission, certain DAMON ABI usages that are supposed to be uncommon, and a rare race timing, though. The issue was discovered [2] by Sashiko as a part [3] of its bug report.
[2] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-7f814c9a-986f-4103-a55a-ef9537dcf62b
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
--- mm/damon/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
mm/damon/core.c +16 -6
@@ -807,15 +807,18 @@ static void damos_commit_quota_goal_union( } } -static void damos_commit_quota_goal ( +static int damos_commit_quota_goal (struct damos_quota_goal *dst,struct damos_quota_goal *src) { +if (!src->target_value) +return -EINVAL ; dst->metric = src->metric; dst->target_value = src->target_value;if (dst->metric ==DAMOS_QUOTA_USER_INPUT ) dst->current_value = src->current_value;/* keep last_psi_total as is, since it will be updated in next cycle */ damos_commit_quota_goal_union (dst, src); +return 0 ; }/**
@@ -833,14 +836,17 @@ static void damos_commit_quota_goal(int damos_commit_quota_goals (struct damos_quota *dst,struct damos_quota *src) {struct damos_quota_goal *dst_goal, *next, *src_goal, *new_goal; -int i =0 , j =0 ; +int i =0 , j =0 , err;damos_for_each_quota_goal_safe (dst_goal, next, dst) { src_goal =damos_nth_quota_goal (i++, src); -if (src_goal) -damos_commit_quota_goal (dst_goal, src_goal); -else +if (src_goal) { + err =damos_commit_quota_goal (dst_goal, src_goal); +if (err) +return err; + }else {damos_destroy_quota_goal (dst_goal); + } }damos_for_each_quota_goal_safe (src_goal, next, src) {if (j++ < i)
@@ -849,7 +855,11 @@ int damos_commit_quota_goals(struct damos_quota *dst, struct damos_quota *src) src_goal->metric, src_goal->target_value);if (!new_goal)return -ENOMEM ; -damos_commit_quota_goal (new_goal, src_goal); + err =damos_commit_quota_goal (new_goal, src_goal); +if (err) { +damos_free_quota_goal (new_goal); +return err; + }damos_add_quota_goal (dst, new_goal); }return 0 ;
base-commit: 2926d88bb7fc4608fd942453d929c39e4e5ec006
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
[email protected]
AI reviewThank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] mm/damon: incomplete zero target_value check in damos_commit_quota_goal() --
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/damon: incomplete zero target_value check in damos_commit_quota_goal() --
commit ea716ea29282ef733822096401c5c8d92eaaef58
Author: SJ Park <[email protected]>
mm/damon/core: error damos_commit_quota_goal() for zero target_value
This commit validates that a DAMOS quota goal's target_value is non-zero in damos_commit_quota_goal(), returning -EINVAL and propagating the error through damos_commit_quota_goals() to prevent a division-by-zero in damos_quota_score().
Quoted 5 lines
mm/damon/core.c +0
-0
mm/damon/core.c static void damos_commit_quota_goal_union( · line 814
Quoted 9 lines
mm/damon/core.c +3
-1@@ -807,15 +807,18 @@ static void damos_commit_quota_goal_union( } } -static void damos_commit_quota_goal ( +static int damos_commit_quota_goal (struct damos_quota_goal *dst,struct damos_quota_goal *src) { +if (!src->target_value) +return -EINVAL ;
[Severity: High]
Does checking for a zero target_value only in damos_commit_quota_goal() cover the path where DAMON is started via sysfs in this stable tree?
In mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c, target_value_store() updates goal->target_value without holding damon_sysfs_lock:
mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:target_value_store() {
struct damos_sysfs_quota_goal *goal = container_of(kobj, struct
damos_sysfs_quota_goal, kobj);
int err = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &goal->target_value);
return err ? err : count;
}Meanwhile, damos_sysfs_add_quota_score() reads sysfs_goal->target_value twice without synchronization against target_value_store():
mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damos_sysfs_add_quota_score() {
if (!sysfs_goal->target_value)
continue;
goal = damos_new_quota_goal(sysfs_goal->metric,
sysfs_goal->target_value);
...
damos_add_quota_goal(quota, goal);
}If target_value_store() writes 0 between those two reads, damos_new_quota_goal() allocates a goal with target_value == 0 and attaches it to quota->goals.
When starting DAMON via state_store() -> damon_sysfs_cmd_request_callback() -> damon_sysfs_handle_cmd() -> damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on(), this branch builds the context and starts kdamond directly without calling damon_commit_ctx() or damos_commit_quota_goals():
mm/damon/sysfs.c:damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on() {
ctx = damon_sysfs_build_ctx(kdamond->contexts->contexts_arr[0]);
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
kfree(repeat_call_control);
return PTR_ERR(ctx);
}
err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, false);
}Here damon_sysfs_build_ctx() populates scheme->quota.goals via damon_sysfs_apply_inputs() -> damon_sysfs_add_schemes() -> damon_sysfs_mk_scheme() -> damos_sysfs_add_quota_score(), bypassing damos_commit_quota_goal() entirely.
When kdamond subsequently runs kdamond_fn() -> kdamond_apply_schemes() -> damos_adjust_quota() -> damos_set_effective_quota() -> damos_quota_score():
mm/damon/core.c:damos_quota_score() {
highest_score = max(highest_score,
goal->current_value * 10000 /
goal->target_value);
}can this still divide by zero if the race occurs during damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on()?
Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
SJ Park
maintainerQuoted 87 lines · On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 17:37:55 +0000 [email protected] wrote:
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/damon: incomplete zerotarget_valuecheck indamos_commit_quota_goal()--commit
ea716ea29282ef733822096401c5c8d92eaaef58
Author: SJ Park <[email protected]>
mm/damon/core: errordamos_commit_quota_goal()for zerotarget_valueThis commit validates that a DAMOS quota goal's
target_valueis non-zero indamos_commit_quota_goal(), returning-EINVALand propagating the error throughdamos_commit_quota_goals()to prevent a division-by-zero indamos_quota_score().Quoted 5 lines
mm/damon/core.c +0
-0mm/damon/core.c static void damos_commit_quota_goal_union( · line 814
Quoted 9 lines
mm/damon/core.c +3
-1@@ -807,15 +807,18 @@ static void damos_commit_quota_goal_union( } } -static void damos_commit_quota_goal ( +static int damos_commit_quota_goal (struct damos_quota_goal *dst,struct damos_quota_goal *src) { +if (!src->target_value) +return -EINVAL ;[Severity: High]
Does checking for a zerotarget_valueonly indamos_commit_quota_goal()cover the path where DAMON is started via sysfs in this stable tree?In
mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c,target_value_store()updatesgoal->target_valuewithout holdingdamon_sysfs_lock:mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:target_value_store() { struct damos_sysfs_quota_goal *goal = container_of(kobj, struct damos_sysfs_quota_goal, kobj); int err = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &goal->target_value); return err ? err : count; }Meanwhile,
damos_sysfs_add_quota_score()readssysfs_goal->target_valuetwice without synchronization againsttarget_value_store():mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damos_sysfs_add_quota_score() { if (!sysfs_goal->target_value) continue; goal = damos_new_quota_goal(sysfs_goal->metric, sysfs_goal->target_value); ... damos_add_quota_goal(quota, goal); }If
target_value_store()writes 0 between those two reads,damos_new_quota_goal()allocates a goal withtarget_value== 0 and attaches it toquota->goals.When starting DAMON via
state_store()->damon_sysfs_cmd_request_callback()->damon_sysfs_handle_cmd()->damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on(), this branch builds the context and starts kdamond directly without callingdamon_commit_ctx()ordamos_commit_quota_goals():mm/damon/sysfs.c:damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on() { ctx = damon_sysfs_build_ctx(kdamond->contexts->contexts_arr[0]); if (IS_ERR(ctx)) { kfree(repeat_call_control); return PTR_ERR(ctx); } err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, false); }Here
damon_sysfs_build_ctx()populatesscheme->quota.goalsviadamon_sysfs_apply_inputs()->damon_sysfs_add_schemes()->damon_sysfs_mk_scheme()->damos_sysfs_add_quota_score(), bypassingdamos_commit_quota_goal()entirely.When kdamond subsequently runs
kdamond_fn()->kdamond_apply_schemes()->damos_adjust_quota()->damos_set_effective_quota()->damos_quota_score():
Quoted 8 lines
mm/damon/core.c:damos_quota_score() { highest_score = max(highest_score, goal->current_value * 10000 / goal->target_value); }can this still divide by zero if the race occurs during
damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on()?
Nice catch. I also just found this issue while working on 6.8. Same issue in the patch for 7.2.y [1]. I will withdraw this and that, and work on the next spin.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Quoted 3 lines
Signature · 2 lines
-- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
Thanks,
SJ
SJ Park
maintainerQuoted 42 lines · On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:27:10 -0700 SJ Park <[email protected]> wrote:
Patch series "mm/damon: move zero damos quota
target_valuehandling to the core layer".Having zero DAMOS quota target value can cause division by zero. DAMON API callers are checking the target value parameters to avoid that. It is easy to make mistakes in some of the multiple API callers. Move that to the core layer.
Patch 1 adds the corner case handling into the core layer DAMON parameters validation logic. Patches 2 and 3 remove no more needed DAMON API callers side handling of the corner case in
DAMON_LRU_SORTandDMON_SAMPLIE_MTIER, respectively.This patch (of 3):
If a DAMOS scheme has a
damos_quota_goalof zerotarget_value,damos_quota_goal()could trigger division-by-zero error. Hence each DAMON API callers should do the zerotarget_valuevalidation. It is easy to make mistakes. Actually such bugs inDAMON_LRU_SORTandDAMON_SAMPLE_MTIERwere found and fixed [1].It is better to handle the corner case only once in the core layer, instead of multiple places in all DAMON API callers. One straightforward option is using an alternative denominator for the corner case in the
damos_quota_goal(). However, the zerotarget_valueis meaningless. In this case, the quota goal is always evaluated as achieved or over-achieved. The quota will only keep being reduced.Simply avoid using zero
target_valueby adding a check in the core layer DAMOS quota goal parameters validation/commit path,damos_commit_quota_goal(). Update it to return an error in the case. Also update its caller to propagate the error.Notes for stable kernel porting. The upstream commit doesn't have
Fixes: and therefore not ported to stable kernels. It turned out it fixes commit8b549a4fd3c5("mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: commit damos quota goals user input to DAMOS") which was merged into v6.8. The user impact is a race condition that can result in divide-by-zero. Hence backport. Reproducing the issue requires sysfs write permission, certain DAMON ABI usages that are supposed to be uncommon, and a rare race timing, though. The issue was discovered [2] by Sashiko as a part [3] of its bug report.
Quoted 2 lines
[2] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-7f814c9a-986f-4103-a55a-ef9537dcf62b
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
On v6.18, DAMON sysfs interface calls damon_commit_ctx() for validation purpose, for parameters commit but initial DAMON start. Hence this patch fixes the issue in parmeters commit but initial DAMON start. I will post a new version to cover the start case.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]