Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: do not touch frozen folios in deferred_split_isolate()" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree

PATCH New Sasha Levin 1 participant 2 messages Nov 7 – Nov 10

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Sasha Levin

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.18.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5da8ec3262bbb40f057f3b0dacc18f37bda06f95
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '[email protected]' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.18.y' 'HEAD^..'

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 5da8ec3262bbb40f057f3b0dacc18f37bda06f95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:15:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: do not touch frozen folios in
deferred_split_isolate()

Patch series "Fix deferred_split_isolate() and drop the split workaround", v2.

deferred_split_isolate() probes each queued folio with folio_try_get(). folio_try_get() failure is treated as a lost race with folio_put().

It leads to wrong results when !folio_try_get() was not caused by folio_put(): for a frozen folio, PG_partially_mapped gets wrongfully cleared and the folio dropped from the queue.

It came up in the review of my collapse RFC series:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

The bug is inert in upstream code:

- __folio_split() works around it;
- __folio_migrate_mapping() freezes a folio it is about to replace;
- reclaim freezes only what try_to_unmap() already unmapped.

No cc:stable needed. But my collapse rework steps on it, so it is worth fixing.

The branch the first patch removes also hid an inert, pre-existing bug in the zone device path:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

The first patch fixes deferred_split_isolate().

The second patch removes the workaround for this deferred_split_isolate() behaviour from __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped().

Tested in a VM: split_huge_page_test, folio_split_race_test and cow pass.

Also ran a test that leaves 16 partially mapped THPs on the deferred split queue and drives thp-deferred_split through debugfs, checking nr_anon_partially_mapped.

This patch (of 2):

deferred_split_isolate() probes each queued folio with folio_try_get(). folio_try_get() failure is treated as a lost race with folio_put(): clear PG_partially_mapped, correct MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, take the folio off the queue.

The folio_put() race is the most common case for !folio_try_get(), but it is not the only option. Another scenario is folio_ref_freeze().

A zero refcount in such cases does not mean the folio is going away. It means "don't touch me" and current deferred_split_isolate() doesn't respect it. It can lead to unqueueing folios from the deferred list for no reason:

    CPU 0                            CPU 1
    ---------------------------      ------------------------------
    freeze a mapped folio            deferred_split_scan()

folio_ref_freeze() folio_try_get() fails
folio_clear_partially_mapped() NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED-- folio off the queue
give up, put it back
folio_ref_unfreeze()

The folio is still partially mapped, but it is no longer a split candidate. Nothing queues it again until part of it is unmapped once more.

Skip the folio instead: whoever freezes the folio, owns it and owner is responsible for its fate. It also covers the folio_put() case:
__folio_put() unqueues the folio via folio_unqueue_deferred_split().

Nothing is lost by skipping. Everything that frees a queued folio unqueues it first, and folio_unqueue_deferred_split() clears PG_partially_mapped and brings MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED down on the way:

    __folio_put(), folios_put_refs()   mm/folio.c
    __folio_migrate_mapping()          mm/migrate.c
    shrink_folio_list()                mm/vmscan.c

__folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped() does the same by hand, under the list_lru lock it holds across the freeze. A freeze that ends in folio_ref_unfreeze() leaves a folio that is still partially mapped and still belongs on the queue.

---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 19 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c +4 -15
index 54494c3fa9835..779c02e0bf6cc 100644
@@ -4638,22 +4638,11 @@ static enum lru_status deferred_split_isolate(struct list_head *item,
 	struct folio *folio = container_of(item, struct folio, _deferred_list);
 	struct list_head *freeable = cb_arg;
 
-	if (folio_try_get(folio)) {
-		list_lru_isolate_move(lru, item, freeable);
-		return LRU_REMOVED;
-	}
+	/* Lost race to folio_put() or the folio is under folio_ref_freeze() */
+	if (!folio_try_get(folio))
+		return LRU_SKIP;
 
-	/*
-	 * We lost race with folio_put(). Read folio state before the
-	 * isolate: folio_unqueue_deferred_split() checks list_empty()
-	 * locklessly, so once removed the folio can be freed any time.
-	 */
-	if (folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
-		folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
-		mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio),
-			      MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1);
-	}
-	list_lru_isolate(lru, item);
+	list_lru_isolate_move(lru, item, freeable);
 	return LRU_REMOVED;
 }
 
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mm/huge_memory: do not touch frozen folios in deferred_split_isolate()

From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 5da8ec3262bbb40f057f3b0dacc18f37bda06f95 ]

Patch series "Fix deferred_split_isolate() and drop the split workaround", v2.

deferred_split_isolate() probes each queued folio with folio_try_get(). folio_try_get() failure is treated as a lost race with folio_put().

It leads to wrong results when !folio_try_get() was not caused by folio_put(): for a frozen folio, PG_partially_mapped gets wrongfully cleared and the folio dropped from the queue.

It came up in the review of my collapse RFC series:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

The bug is inert in upstream code:

- __folio_split() works around it;
- __folio_migrate_mapping() freezes a folio it is about to replace;
- reclaim freezes only what try_to_unmap() already unmapped.

No cc:stable needed. But my collapse rework steps on it, so it is worth fixing.

The branch the first patch removes also hid an inert, pre-existing bug in the zone device path:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

The first patch fixes deferred_split_isolate().

The second patch removes the workaround for this deferred_split_isolate() behaviour from __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped().

Tested in a VM: split_huge_page_test, folio_split_race_test and cow pass.

Also ran a test that leaves 16 partially mapped THPs on the deferred split queue and drives thp-deferred_split through debugfs, checking nr_anon_partially_mapped.

This patch (of 2):

deferred_split_isolate() probes each queued folio with folio_try_get(). folio_try_get() failure is treated as a lost race with folio_put(): clear PG_partially_mapped, correct MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, take the folio off the queue.

The folio_put() race is the most common case for !folio_try_get(), but it is not the only option. Another scenario is folio_ref_freeze().

A zero refcount in such cases does not mean the folio is going away. It means "don't touch me" and current deferred_split_isolate() doesn't respect it. It can lead to unqueueing folios from the deferred list for no reason:

    CPU 0                            CPU 1
    ---------------------------      ------------------------------
    freeze a mapped folio            deferred_split_scan()

folio_ref_freeze() folio_try_get() fails
folio_clear_partially_mapped() NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED-- folio off the queue
give up, put it back
folio_ref_unfreeze()

The folio is still partially mapped, but it is no longer a split candidate. Nothing queues it again until part of it is unmapped once more.

Skip the folio instead: whoever freezes the folio, owns it and owner is responsible for its fate. It also covers the folio_put() case:
__folio_put() unqueues the folio via folio_unqueue_deferred_split().

Nothing is lost by skipping. Everything that frees a queued folio unqueues it first, and folio_unqueue_deferred_split() clears PG_partially_mapped and brings MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED down on the way:

    __folio_put(), folios_put_refs()   mm/folio.c
    __folio_migrate_mapping()          mm/migrate.c
    shrink_folio_list()                mm/vmscan.c

__folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped() does the same by hand, under the list_lru lock it holds across the freeze. A freeze that ends in folio_ref_unfreeze() leaves a folio that is still partially mapped and still belongs on the queue.

Fixes 8422acdc97ed ("mm: introduce a pageflag for partially mapped folios")
Assisted-by Claude-Code:claude-opus-5
Cc Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
Cc Barry Song <[email protected]>
Cc Dev Jain <[email protected]>
Cc Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc Kairui Song <[email protected]>
Cc Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
Cc Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Cc Ryan Roberts <[email protected]>
[ sashal: adapted deferred_split_isolate() changes to the existing deferred_split_scan() loop because the list_lru conversion is absent ]
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c +2 -7
index 78fecc3ad5700..9f547400366b4 100644
@@ -4310,14 +4310,9 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 							_deferred_list) {
 		if (folio_try_get(folio)) {
 			folio_batch_add(&fbatch, folio);
-		} else if (folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
-			/* We lost race with folio_put() */
-			folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
-			mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio),
-				      MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1);
+			list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
+			ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
 		}
-		list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
-		ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
 		if (!--sc->nr_to_scan)
 			break;
 		if (!folio_batch_space(&fbatch))
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0