SATA port multiplier support in 2.6.21
Hello:
I understand that SATA port multiplier support was added in 2.6.24. I would like to use 2.6.21 and still use port multilplier. Can someone point me to a patch I may use to do this? Any other ideas?
Thanks a lot!
Signature · 2 lines
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SATA-port-multiplier-support-in-2.6.21-tp24580821p24580821.html Sent from the linux-ide mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Quoted 6 lines · Learner Study
Hello:
I understand that SATA port multiplier support was added in 2.6.24. I would like to use 2.6.21 and still use port multilplier. Can someone point me to a patch I may use to do this? Any other ideas?
There were patches from Tejun (libata-tj-stable) for 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 at one point, but I don't know where you'd find them anymore (the original site at http://home-tj.org/wiki/index.php/Libata-tj-stable
is down). You may have some luck googling around for those.
2.6.21 is over two years old, so your best bet would be to upgrade to a more recent version, or, if you're stuck with some distribution kernel, talk to your vendor for support.
-jim
Quoted 11 lines · Jim Paris
Quoted 5 lines · Learner Study
Hello:
I understand that SATA port multiplier support was added in 2.6.24. I would like to use 2.6.21 and still use port multilplier. Can someone point me to a patch I may use to do this? Any other ideas?
There were patches from Tejun (libata-tj-stable) for 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 at one point, but I don't know where you'd find them anymore (the original site at http://home-tj.org/wiki/index.php/Libata-tj-stable
is down). You may have some luck googling around for those.
Here are old patches.
http://htj.dyndns.org/export/libata-tj-old/
Quoted 3 lines
2.6.21 is over two years old, so your best bet would be to upgrade to a more recent version, or, if you're stuck with some distribution kernel, talk to your vendor for support.
But, yeah, seriously, if at all possible, please use newer kernels. There have been a lot of updates.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun
Hi Tejun:
I tried the following link but am getting HTTP 403 error!
I would appreciate if you could please point me to patch for port multiplier back ported to 2.6.21?
Thanks a lot!
Quoted 29 lines · Tejun Heo
Quoted 11 lines · Jim Paris
Quoted 5 lines · Learner Study
Hello:
I understand that SATA port multiplier support was added in 2.6.24. I would like to use 2.6.21 and still use port multilplier. Can someone point me to a patch I may use to do this? Any other ideas?
There were patches from Tejun (libata-tj-stable) for 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 at one point, but I don't know where you'd find them anymore (the original site at http://home-tj.org/wiki/index.php/Libata-tj-stable
is down). You may have some luck googling around for those.Here are old patches.
http://htj.dyndns.org/export/libata-tj-old/
Quoted 3 lines
2.6.21 is over two years old, so your best bet would be to upgrade to a more recent version, or, if you're stuck with some distribution kernel, talk to your vendor for support.
But, yeah, seriously, if at all possible, please use newer kernels. There have been a lot of updates.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Quoted 1 line · Learner Study
I tried the following link but am getting HTTP 403 error!
It works fine here. Can you please try again?
http://htj.dyndns.org/export/libata-tj-old/
Quoted 2 lines
I would appreciate if you could please point me to patch for port multiplier back ported to 2.6.21?
Eh... I seem to have patches for 17, 18, 22 and 23 but unforunately not for 21.
Signature · 1 line
tejun
The link is working fine now. Thanks!
If I were to pick one, which one should I try first on 21? 18 or 22?
thanks!
Quoted 16 lines · Tejun Heo
Quoted 1 line · Learner Study
I tried the following link but am getting HTTP 403 error!
It works fine here. Can you please try again?
http://htj.dyndns.org/export/libata-tj-old/
Quoted 2 lines
I would appreciate if you could please point me to patch for port multiplier back ported to 2.6.21?
Eh... I seem to have patches for 17, 18, 22 and 23 but unforunately not for 21.
--
tejun
Quoted 3 lines · Learner Study
The link is working fine now. Thanks!
If I were to pick one, which one should I try first on 21? 18 or 22?
I really can't recommend any of those. They're all with many known bugs and if you encounter one there, you'll be on your own.
Signature · 1 line
tejun