Skip to contentSkip to conversation

f2fs: fix wrong return value of f2fs_acl_create

PATCH Superseded Tiezhu Yang 2 participants 3 messages Nov 19, 2018 – Nov 20, 2018 F2FS file system

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 f2fs: fix wrong return value of f2fs_acl_create

When call f2fs_acl_create_masq() failed, the caller f2fs_acl_create() should return -EIO instead of -ENOMEM, this patch makes it consistent with posix_acl_create() which has been fixed in commit beaf226b863a ("posix_acl: don't ignore return value of posix_acl_create_masq()").

Fixes 83dfe53c185e ("f2fs: fix reference leaks in f2fs_acl_create")
---
 fs/f2fs/acl.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/acl.c +6 -5
index fa707cd..b791c24 100644
@@ -351,13 +351,14 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 	if (IS_ERR(p))
 		return PTR_ERR(p);
 
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!clone)
-		goto no_mem;
+		goto err_release;
 
 	ret = f2fs_acl_create_masq(clone, mode);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto no_mem_clone;
+		goto err_release_clone;
 
 	if (ret == 0)
 		posix_acl_release(clone);
@@ -371,11 +372,11 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 
 	return 0;
 
-no_mem_clone:
+err_release_clone:
 	posix_acl_release(clone);
-no_mem:
+err_release:
 	posix_acl_release(p);
-	return -ENOMEM;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
maintainer Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 16 lines · Tiezhu Yang

When call f2fs_acl_create_masq() failed, the caller f2fs_acl_create() should return -EIO instead of -ENOMEM, this patch makes it consistent with posix_acl_create() which has been fixed in commit beaf226b863a ("posix_acl: don't ignore return value of posix_acl_create_masq()").

Fixes 83dfe53c185e ("f2fs: fix reference leaks in f2fs_acl_create")
---
 fs/f2fs/acl.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/acl.c +0 -0
index fa707cd..b791c24 100644

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 356

Quoted 6 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -0
@@ -351,13 +351,14 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 	if (IS_ERR(p))
 		return PTR_ERR(p);
 
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!clone)

We can avoid assigning ret by:

clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);

if (!clone) {
	ret = -ENOMEM;
	goto release_acl;
}
Quoted 11 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +2 -2
-		goto no_mem;
+		goto err_release;
 
 	ret = f2fs_acl_create_masq(clone, mode);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto no_mem_clone;
+		goto err_release_clone;
 
 	if (ret == 0)
 		posix_acl_release(clone);

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 375

Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
@@ -371,11 +372,11 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 
 	return 0;
 
-no_mem_clone:
+err_release_clone:

release_clone:

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 377

Quoted 3 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
 	posix_acl_release(clone);
-no_mem:
+err_release:

release_acl:

Tag naming is minor, anyway this patch looks good to me.

Thanks,

Quoted 7 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
 	posix_acl_release(p);
-	return -ENOMEM;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,
#2 lore raw
Quoted 51 lines · Chao Yu
Quoted 16 lines · Tiezhu Yang

When call f2fs_acl_create_masq() failed, the caller f2fs_acl_create() should return -EIO instead of -ENOMEM, this patch makes it consistent with posix_acl_create() which has been fixed in commit beaf226b863a ("posix_acl: don't ignore return value of posix_acl_create_masq()").

Fixes 83dfe53c185e ("f2fs: fix reference leaks in f2fs_acl_create")
---
 fs/f2fs/acl.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/acl.c +0 -0
index fa707cd..b791c24 100644

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 356

Quoted 6 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -0
@@ -351,13 +351,14 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 	if (IS_ERR(p))
 		return PTR_ERR(p);
 
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!clone)

We can avoid assigning ret by:

clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);

if (!clone) {
	ret = -ENOMEM;
	goto release_acl;
}
Quoted 11 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +2 -2
-		goto no_mem;
+		goto err_release;
 
 	ret = f2fs_acl_create_masq(clone, mode);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto no_mem_clone;
+		goto err_release_clone;
 
 	if (ret == 0)
 		posix_acl_release(clone);

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 375

Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
@@ -371,11 +372,11 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
 
 	return 0;
 
-no_mem_clone:
+err_release_clone:

release_clone:

Quoted 7 lines

fs/f2fs/acl.c static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode, · line 377

Quoted 3 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
 	posix_acl_release(clone);
-no_mem:
+err_release:

release_acl:

Tag naming is minor, anyway this patch looks good to me.

Thanks for your suggestion, I will send a v2 patch.

Thanks,

Quoted 12 lines

Thanks,

Quoted 7 lines
fs/f2fs/acl.c +1 -1
 	posix_acl_release(p);
-	return -ENOMEM;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,