Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm4, mm5, bk10 regression results

DISCUSSION Martin J. Bligh 2 participants 2 messages Jun 6, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Martin J. Bligh
Quoted 7 lines

latest -mm tree results:

http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm4/2.5.70-mm3-vs-2.5.70-mm4/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm4/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm4/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm5/2.5.70-mm4-vs-2.5.70-mm5/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm5/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm5/

Quoted 6 lines

latest -bk tree results:

http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk10/2.5.70-bk9-vs-2.5.70-bk10/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk10/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk10/

Quoted 6 lines

Great stuff ;-)

The summaries you have on the web pages are really useful, and look short enough to go into the email. Any chance you could include them in future emails?

Yes they can, however, they will be a few issues. Currently the nightly and the benchmark summaries are html and posting html is not allowed. Converting them to text with URLs unhides the nice way hyperlinks buries a long URL and shows a short hyperlink name, thus producing long lines that wrap and distort the formatting. Are the summaries still worthwhile without the URLs to the data? For the toplevel summary, probably not, and I'm fairly sure this was what you were requesting.

Let me think about how the summaries could be changed to accomodate your request. One less link to traverse would be bring the data closer to the viewer's eyes and thats a good thing. :)

Thanks for the feedback,

Mark